vimprobable-users Mailing List for Vimprobable (Page 6)
Vimprobable is a lean web browser optimised for full keyboard control
Brought to you by:
hanness
Menu
▾
▴
vimprobable-users — Mailing list for Vimprobable users
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(14) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(38) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(26) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: captaincurrie <cap...@gm...> - 2014-09-18 22:27:49
|
Hannes Schüller <hannes@...> writes: > > Hi! > > captaincurrie <captaincurrie@...> wrote: > > i have > > > > set statusbar = false > > > > in my ~/.config/vimprobablerc. But that only > > removes it at startup and until i've used it. > > I'm not quite sure whether I understand your intention fully. The > status bar (the black bar where the URL and the loading progress are > shown) appears again automatically? When? Under which circumstances? Is > it possible you're talking about the input bar (the bottom bar where > commands are typed)? > > Hannes > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > Hey, Sorry about that Hannes, i did mean the input bar. But now that you mention it, the status bar does show up after i press <Tab> to open the 'completion menu' and close it. Is that intentional? Basically, even thou both bars can be set to 'false', they show up when 'used' and then stay up. Is that intentional? Personally i would prefer that they both auto-hide when not in use. |
|
From: Jason R. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-09-18 20:50:02
|
On 18/09/14 at 06:00pm, Hannes Schüller wrote: >Hi all, > >I'd like to propose two changes to the default configuration: > >- Cookie policy to accept no third party cookies. I believe this goes > along with the general privacy philosophy of the browser. I'm aware > that it will 'break' a couple of pages, though I nevertheless believe > it is a sensible default. Agreed. > >- Include startpage.com as shortcut s. Since the demise of Scroogle, > this shortcut is not taken anymore. Many people seem to prefer Google > results. This seems to be the most sensible way to provide them. > This makes sense. >On a related note, is everybody happy with the default search engine >setting? Or is everybody using DuckDuckGo/something else anyway (i.e. >it should become the new default shortcut)? > Happy enough. Cheers, /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ [GnuPG Key: B1BD4E40] |
|
From: Matt C. <je...@gm...> - 2014-09-18 16:58:53
|
Cookie policy makes sense. I use duck duck go but haven't tried start page yet myself. On Sep 18, 2014 11:57 AM, "Hannes Schüller" <ha...@yl...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose two changes to the default configuration: > > - Cookie policy to accept no third party cookies. I believe this goes > along with the general privacy philosophy of the browser. I'm aware > that it will 'break' a couple of pages, though I nevertheless believe > it is a sensible default. > > - Include startpage.com as shortcut s. Since the demise of Scroogle, > this shortcut is not taken anymore. Many people seem to prefer Google > results. This seems to be the most sensible way to provide them. > > On a related note, is everybody happy with the default search engine > setting? Or is everybody using DuckDuckGo/something else anyway (i.e. > it should become the new default shortcut)? > > Comments, supporting or adverse, welcome! > > Hannes > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Vimprobable-users mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimprobable-users > |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-18 15:57:24
|
Hi all, I'd like to propose two changes to the default configuration: - Cookie policy to accept no third party cookies. I believe this goes along with the general privacy philosophy of the browser. I'm aware that it will 'break' a couple of pages, though I nevertheless believe it is a sensible default. - Include startpage.com as shortcut s. Since the demise of Scroogle, this shortcut is not taken anymore. Many people seem to prefer Google results. This seems to be the most sensible way to provide them. On a related note, is everybody happy with the default search engine setting? Or is everybody using DuckDuckGo/something else anyway (i.e. it should become the new default shortcut)? Comments, supporting or adverse, welcome! Hannes |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-18 15:51:21
|
Hi! captaincurrie <cap...@gm...> wrote: > i have > > set statusbar = false > > in my ~/.config/vimprobablerc. But that only > removes it at startup and until i've used it. I'm not quite sure whether I understand your intention fully. The status bar (the black bar where the URL and the loading progress are shown) appears again automatically? When? Under which circumstances? Is it possible you're talking about the input bar (the bottom bar where commands are typed)? Hannes |
|
From: captaincurrie <cap...@gm...> - 2014-09-16 00:35:12
|
Hello, Having the statusbar auto-hide when not being used would be awesome. I use a tililing window manager (dwm), and the status bar is ugly when you have two windows open in the stack Anyways, i have set statusbar = false in my ~/.config/vimprobablerc. But that only removes it at startup and until i've used it. Having it auto hide would be wonderful. |
|
From: Jason R. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-09-15 18:06:33
|
On 15/09/14 at 05:21pm, Hannes Schüller wrote: >Hannes Schüller <ha...@yl...> wrote: >> > As these are stored without time limits and Webkit doesn't provide >> > any means to control their storage, I went for turning off Web >> > Storage per default. But I only tried it for some days, so I >> > wouldn't recommend it for now. >> >> Then we should just see how it develops. I will also switch it off by >> default and we'll see if we run into any problems. > >So, my experience is that switching this off had absolutely *no* >negative repercussions for me. There were no functional limitations on >any websites I've visited. What happened to everybody else? Please post >your experiences! > >For me, the question now is what to make the default setting. On or off? > Given the philosophy of the project: off. Cheers, /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ [GnuPG Key: B1BD4E40] |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-15 15:18:05
|
Hannes Schüller <ha...@yl...> wrote: > > As these are stored without time limits and Webkit doesn't provide > > any means to control their storage, I went for turning off Web > > Storage per default. But I only tried it for some days, so I > > wouldn't recommend it for now. > > Then we should just see how it develops. I will also switch it off by > default and we'll see if we run into any problems. So, my experience is that switching this off had absolutely *no* negative repercussions for me. There were no functional limitations on any websites I've visited. What happened to everybody else? Please post your experiences! For me, the question now is what to make the default setting. On or off? Hannes |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-05 15:17:08
|
"Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@ha...> wrote: > Yup, that works, thanks :) Good news :) Hannes |
|
From: Serge E. H. <se...@ha...> - 2014-09-05 15:14:07
|
Quoting Hannes Schüller (ha...@yl...): > Hi Serge! > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@ha...> wrote: > > Quoting Hannes Schüller (ha...@yl...): > > > Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > > > > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and > > > > the command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I > > > > found here: > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > > > > - 'f' works correctly > > > > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > > > > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens > > > > (no output on the terminal neither) > > > > - t opens a new window with the selected url. > > > > > > I posted a patch some time ago: > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . > > > Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the > > > issue for you? > > > > Just built with that patch, sadly doesn't fix it for me. > > Did you :set popups=true ? D'oh! I misread the patch and missed that. I was setting scripts=true. Yup, that works, thanks :) |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-05 14:21:08
|
Hi Serge! "Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@ha...> wrote: > Quoting Hannes Schüller (ha...@yl...): > > Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > > > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and > > > the command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I > > > found here: > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > > > - 'f' works correctly > > > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > > > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens > > > (no output on the terminal neither) > > > - t opens a new window with the selected url. > > > > I posted a patch some time ago: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . > > Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the > > issue for you? > > Just built with that patch, sadly doesn't fix it for me. Did you :set popups=true ? Hannes |
|
From: Serge E. H. <se...@ha...> - 2014-09-05 14:16:51
|
Quoting Hannes Schüller (ha...@yl...): > Hi Laurent! > > Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the > > command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found > > here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > > - 'f' works correctly > > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no > > output on the terminal neither) > > - t opens a new window with the selected url. > > I posted a patch some time ago: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . > Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the > issue for you? Just built with that patch, sadly doesn't fix it for me. |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-03 18:18:11
|
Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > How do I apply the patch? Simply place it in the directory where you have the source code and run patch -i popups.patch Then recompile. Hannes |
|
From: Laurent V. E. <lva...@gm...> - 2014-09-03 18:12:06
|
Oh you were talking about my first thread! I thought you talked about the one I linked in the mail. I only got an automatic answer saying that my message was waiting for a moderator's approval and no other reaction (I wasn't yet on the mailing list), so i thought it was lost. How do I apply the patch? Laurent 2014-09-03 19:49 GMT+02:00 Hannes Schüller <ha...@yl...>: > Hi Laurent, > > since the first response to your post yesterday seems to have slipped > by you, here it is again. > > Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the > > command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found > > here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > > - 'f' works correctly > > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no > > output on the terminal neither) > > - t opens a new window with the selected url. > > I posted a patch some time ago: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . > Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the > issue for you? > > Hannes > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Vimprobable-users mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimprobable-users > |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-03 17:46:50
|
Hi Laurent, since the first response to your post yesterday seems to have slipped by you, here it is again. Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the > command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found > here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > - 'f' works correctly > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no > output on the terminal neither) > - t opens a new window with the selected url. I posted a patch some time ago: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the issue for you? Hannes |
|
From: Laurent V. E. <lva...@gm...> - 2014-09-03 17:42:22
|
Hi Hannes, Nothing wrong with the existing thread. I'm new on the mailing list and I didn't check on how to continue that thread. Laurent 2014-09-03 19:35 GMT+02:00 Hannes Schüller <ha...@yl...>: > Hi Laurent, > > anything wrong with the existing thread? > > Hannes > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Vimprobable-users mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimprobable-users > |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-03 17:32:02
|
Hi Laurent, anything wrong with the existing thread? Hannes |
|
From: Laurent V. E. <lva...@gm...> - 2014-09-03 17:22:52
|
Hi all, I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 - 'f' works correctly - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no output on the terminal neither) - t opens a new window with the selected url. Can anyone help me? Laurent |
|
From: Jason R. <jas...@gm...> - 2014-09-03 06:29:16
|
On 03/09/14 at 08:16am, Hannes Schüller wrote: > Hi Laurent! > > Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the > > command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found > > here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > > - 'f' works correctly > > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no > > output on the terminal neither) > > - t opens a new window with the selected url. > > I posted a patch some time ago: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . > Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the > issue for you? > I thought I had provided feedback; either I intended to here or I did so in #vimprobable… In any event, I have been using the patch since that point and it has restored the functionality. Cheers, /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ [GnuPG Key: B1BD4E40] |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-09-03 06:13:53
|
Hi Laurent! Laurent Van Eesbeeck <lva...@gm...> wrote: > I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the > command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found > here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 > - 'f' works correctly > - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are > highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no > output on the terminal neither) > - t opens a new window with the selected url. I posted a patch some time ago: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/268 . Unfortunately, there has been no feedback so far. Does this fix the issue for you? Hannes |
|
From: Laurent V. E. <lva...@gm...> - 2014-09-02 12:24:00
|
Hi all, I just installed vimprobable2 (version 1.4.2-1) on Arch Linux and the command 'F' does not work. The problem is similar to what I found here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.vimprobable.user/216 - 'f' works correctly - when I type 'F' (or comma or ;w or ;t) the links on the page are highlighted as with 'f' but when I type a number nothing happens (no output on the terminal neither) - t opens a new window with the selected url. Can anyone help me? Laurent |
|
From: Daniel C. <dan...@gm...> - 2014-08-24 16:38:22
|
Jan Niemeyer <ma...@ja...> wrote: > I guess there are non-evil uses for Web Storage. Matt named a good example. > And I like the idea. But can you name a website you regularly visit, that > relies on it? I can't. I don't use any website that would not work if the local storage and html5 database are disabled. And I assume that every serious website or online shop will pay attention to allow also useragent that don't support all htm5 features, accept of google. > As these are stored without time limits and Webkit doesn't provide any means > to control their storage, I went for turning off Web Storage per default. > But I only tried it for some days, so I wouldn't recommend it for now. Personally I'd prefer to keep the default that also webkit uses and let the user decide if these storages are useful or not. > Besides, I doubt it makes it much harder to track you, when you use a > useragent that's, let's say, not very common ;) I think if you use a useragen that's no very common or that only you use, makes it easier to track you, event if cookies, JavaScript, and the html5 storages are disabled, only by your useragent. It's a hard way to keep anonymous in the web, even if html5 storages are disabled. If you are interested in this you can test what's trackable of you on http://samy.pl/evercookie/. Daniel |
|
From: Marcos C. <vim...@pr...> - 2014-08-24 11:32:23
|
En/Je/On 2014-08-20 22:28, Hannes Schüller escribió / skribis / wrote : >I don't play online games, I don't visit any "social networks" or >virtually any website considered "modern". I belong to that rare species too :) -- Marcos Cruz http://programandala.net |
|
From: Hannes S. <ha...@yl...> - 2014-08-20 20:25:33
|
Hi! Jan Niemeyer <ma...@ja...> wrote: > > Providing a switch for this is definitely a great idea! However, I'm > > also not really proficient as to what this is actually used for. > > Can we be confident that it's all spyware and tracking so that we > > should have it off by default? Or are there actually non-evil uses > > of the function out there in the wild? > > I guess there are non-evil uses for Web Storage. Matt named a good > example. And I like the idea. But can you name a website you > regularly visit, that relies on it? I can't. That's my point - I can't, either. But then, I don't play online games, I don't visit any "social networks" or virtually any website considered "modern". Hence my question to the list :) > As these are stored without time limits and Webkit doesn't provide > any means to control their storage, I went for turning off Web > Storage per default. But I only tried it for some days, so I wouldn't > recommend it for now. Then we should just see how it develops. I will also switch it off by default and we'll see if we run into any problems. > Besides, I doubt it makes it much harder to track you, when you use a > useragent that's, let's say, not very common ;) Well, yes, but that's only a valid concern if you're worried about somebody targetting you specifically. I wouldn't expect this to be a huge issue for most users as opposed to the regular, untargeted mass tracking. Hannes |
|
From: Jan N. <ma...@ja...> - 2014-08-20 20:13:04
|
Hi, > (putting you in copy since you don't seem to be subscribed) I am. Picked the wrong address. Sorry. > Providing a switch for this is definitely a great idea! However, I'm > also not really proficient as to what this is actually used for. Can we > be confident that it's all spyware and tracking so that we should have > it off by default? Or are there actually non-evil uses of the function > out there in the wild? I guess there are non-evil uses for Web Storage. Matt named a good example. And I like the idea. But can you name a website you regularly visit, that relies on it? I can't. My local WebStorage-directory was about 30M large when I looked into it. Most of the files only contained a single string, often named UniqueID or something. Youtube, faz.net or the usual trackers like Doubleclick just stored cookies. So far I didn't find a website that stored more than that. As these are stored without time limits and Webkit doesn't provide any means to control their storage, I went for turning off Web Storage per default. But I only tried it for some days, so I wouldn't recommend it for now. Besides, I doubt it makes it much harder to track you, when you use a useragent that's, let's say, not very common ;) Jan |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
