Re: [Vimprobable-users] two ideas to improve the quickmarks

[Hannes S. <ha...@yl...>]

Marcos Cruz <vim...@pr...> wrote:
> I think one optional parameter is enough in most cases; and it's
> easier to implement. 

The attached patch should do this. It makes the %s in search engine
definitions in the rc file optional. So you can now use zero or one
parameters. Intended behaviour:

- If parameter given, but none expected, ignore them and open the
  shortcut.
- If no parameter given, but one was expected, open the shortcut with
  blank string as parameter.

Testing highly appreciated!

Hannes