Re: [Vimprobable-users] suggested changes to implement zoom commands

[Marcos C. <vim...@pr...>]

En/Je/On 2013-05-06 15:41, Hannes Schüller escribió / skribis / wrote :
> Marcos Cruz <vim...@pr...> wrote:
> > > > { "zoomin", zoom,{ZoomIn | ZoomText} },
> > > > { "zoomout",zoom,{ZoomOut | ZoomText} },
> > > > { "zi",zoom,{ZoomIn | ZoomText} },
> > > > { "zo",zoom,{ZoomOut | ZoomText} }  
> 
> Thinking about this, I'd say it might be a good idea to have one
> command for zooming just text (as above) and one for zooming the
> complete page (i.e. including images) as well for full flexibility.

It's a good idea.  

> Would it be clear enough (documented, of course) to have zi/zo zoom
> just the text and zoomin/zoomout to zoom the complete page?

If "zoomin"/"zi" and "zoomout"/"zo" were used that way, it would be
easy to forget which command does what, especially if they're not used
everyday.

I think "zoomin" and "zoomout" are clear enough for zooming the whole
page, since, by default, zooming means zooming everything.  "zoominpage"
and "zoomoutpage" would be clearer forms, but unnecessary.

As for text, I suggest "zoomtextin" and "zoomtextout". 

I think commands that are easier to remember and easier to understand in
the config file are more preferable than ambiguous abbreviations. The
commands' length is not a problem, thanks to tab completion and keyboard
mapping.

Marcos

-- 
http://programandala.net