Re: [Vimprobable-users] Features for next version

[Daniel C. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Hannes!

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Hannes Schüller wrote:
> So, if we went this way, wouldn't this be "Vimprobable3"? I.e. another
> new branch separat from the others? I.e.: Doesn't what you're saying
> actually *support* my suggestion to open up yet another branch to keep
> Vimprobable2 "cleaner"?
Do you mean, we should use a seperate branch for every more featureful
vimprobable? This could be a way, but we have to maintain 3 different
versions, apply bugfixes on them, test them... .
To seperate Vimprobable1 is usefull, because it's realy something other
then the more featrueful Vimprobable2. But I think it's do hard to have
to many branches with seperate versions.
I think all future features should be avaiable for Vimprobable2 and be
enabled/disabled via config.h

Daniel