Re: [Vimprobable-users] Features for next version

[Hannes S. <ha...@yl...>]

Hi!

Daniel Carl <dan...@gm...> wrote:
> > On a related note, there is the question of version numbering.
> > Should we have:
> > - Vimprobable1 1.0 and Vimprobable2 1.0 or
> > - Vimprobable 1.0 and Vimprobable 2.0?
> In my opinion vimprobable1 and vimprobable2 are two different things
> and not only different version of the same programm. I think
> vimprobable1 should be in a seperate branch with seperate version
> numbers. Users that like the vimprobable1 can checkout this branch
> and can fetch bugfixes for it and, maybe, some new fetaures.
> 
> Vimprobable2/master could be the other branch and have it's own
> versionnumbering.
> 
> Like mentiones in a pervious post, I would prefer to put all features
> into the master branch and allo them to be enabled/disabled via
> precompiler options.

So, if we went this way, wouldn't this be "Vimprobable3"? I.e. another
new branch separat from the others? I.e.: Doesn't what you're saying
actually *support* my suggestion to open up yet another branch to keep
Vimprobable2 "cleaner"?

Hannes