Re: [Vimprobable-users] Features for next version

[Hannes S. <ha...@yl...>]

Jason Ryan <jas...@gm...> wrote:
> On 15/08/11 at 08:13am, Hannes Sch__ller wrote:
> > Jason Ryan <jas...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > On a related note, there is the question of version numbering.
> > > > Should we have:
> > > > - Vimprobable1 1.0 and Vimprobable2 1.0 or
> > > > - Vimprobable 1.0 and Vimprobable 2.0?  
> > > 
> > > The former: the latter makes Vimprobable 2.0 sound like the later
> > > release of Vimprobable 1.0
> > 
> > Well, it *is*, isn't it? It's a branch of the original code with
> > stuff added to it.
> > 
> Ah, I hadn't grasped the nature of the relationship: I thought they
> were developed in parallel.

Well, yes, this is also true. Vimprobable2 was branched off
Vimprobable1. Since then, they have been developed in parallel.
However, truely in parallel: Everything has been done in both branches
at the same time save for the addition of new features depending on "2"
exclusive functions.

Hannes