Re: [Vimprobable-users] Features for next version

[Jason R. <jas...@gm...>]

On 15/08/11 at 08:13am, Hannes Schüller wrote:
> Jason Ryan <jas...@gm...> wrote:
> > > On a related note, there is the question of version numbering.
> > > Should we have:
> > > - Vimprobable1 1.0 and Vimprobable2 1.0 or
> > > - Vimprobable 1.0 and Vimprobable 2.0?  
> > 
> > The former: the latter makes Vimprobable 2.0 sound like the later
> > release of Vimprobable 1.0
> 
> Well, it *is*, isn't it? It's a branch of the original code with stuff
> added to it.
> 
Ah, I hadn't grasped the nature of the relationship: I thought they were
developed in parallel.

-- 

http://jasonwryan.com/