vimcdoc-translate

[Vimcdoc-translate] =?GB2312?B?UmU6IFtWaW1jZG9jLXRyYW5zbGF0ZV0gvajS6Q==?=

[Yi-an H. <yia...@gm...>]

Fourth try.

Sounds a good idea. But maybe we should create a branch for 6.4 instead? By
definition, the trunk should follow the latest trend.:) Anyway 7.0 is
supposed to be out soon.

Edit: very soon.

On 4/25/06, tocer <toc...@gm...> wrote:

[Vimcdoc-translate] =?GB2312?B?UmU6IFtWaW1jZG9jLXRyYW5zbGF0ZV0gUg==?= =?GB2312?B?ZTogW1ZpbWNkb2MtdHJhbnNsYXRlXSC9qNLp?=

[James H. <ic...@gm...>]

On 5/3/06, Yi-an Huang <yia...@gm...> wrote:
> Fourth try.
>
> Sounds a good idea. But maybe we should create a branch for 6.4 instead? =
By
> definition, the trunk should follow the latest trend.:) Anyway 7.0 is
> supposed to be out soon.

Keeping two branches (6.4 and 7.x) sounds a good idea to me. :)

test~

--
Best regards,

James He

[Vimcdoc-translate] =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtWaW1jZG9jLXRyYW5zbGF0ZV0gUmU6IFtWaW1jZG9jLXRyYW4=?= =?UTF-8?B?c2xhdGVdIOW7uuiurg==?=

[tocer <toc...@gm...>]

I agree

Yi-an Huang :
> Fourth try.
> 
> Sounds a good idea. But maybe we should create a branch for 6.4 instead? 
> By definition, the trunk should follow the latest trend.:) Anyway 7.0 is 
> supposed to be out soon.
> 
> Edit: very soon.
> 
> On 4/25/06, *tocer* < toc...@gm... 
> <mailto:toc...@gm...>> wrote:
>