Menu
▾
▴
vimcdoc-translate
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-06-03 09:38:22
|
> > congratulations !!! I have received the message that the vimdoc 0.3 released. Thanks, > This term I didn't received any email about vimdoc without this > message, Very strange. I will cc this mail to our mailing list and see if you pick up. Otherwise, could you re-subscribe to it? > and I am ready for cet-4.so I didn't contact with you > .sorry!!!! No worries. Good luck with your exams. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Consolidate POP email and Hotmail in one place |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-29 09:30:20
|
Hi Zimin, Sorry about the late reply. I wasn't checking my mail during the weekend. I see you've finished gui_x11.txt. Great job! On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:31:09 +0800, "=B2=CC =D7=CF=95F" <caizimin@hotmail.c= om> said: > Dear Liang=A3=AC > I need your help. Now I use the gvim 6.2. I need the gvim6.1 doc > file.=20 > can you give me? Thank you.=20 No. You don't need that. You can go directly to the 6.2 docs. They are=20 more update to date. And there arn't many changes anyway. For the one=20 you have done, don't worry about that. That's quite OK. > And I have a suggestion. I think the whether we can add some files=20 > which have NOT occured in cvs with the version 6.2. I found you have=20 > modifed the file to v6.2. I can directly go on to the v6.2. Do you think= =20 > so? I am not sure I understand you fully. But yes we should be all working on= =20 6.2 docs. > Next step I will translate diff.txt and fold.txt with v6.2? Do you have= =20 > some more important files to be done ahead? I can help you first.=20 That's very good. These are two very helpful documents. Thanks, ps. In replying to this mail, I've cc'ed to the list. I hope you won't mind. It is generally a good idea to send/reply questions via the mailing list, so=20 that others can read it too. Rgds, lang2 --=20 Simon Liang wzh...@sp... --=20 http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail |
|
From: Dasn C. <da...@us...> - 2003-09-29 11:14:32
|
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:54:39AM -0800, Simon Liang wrote: > No. You don't need that. You can go directly to the 6.2 docs. They are > more update to date. And there arn't many changes anyway. For the one > you have done, don't worry about that. That's quite OK. When we do a 'diff' between V6.1 and V6.2, we will get a real _big_ report. :-O > I am not sure I understand you fully. But yes we should be all working on > 6.2 docs. Really? I had thought that our project would have kept track of vimdoc (vimdoc.sf.net) project. :-) -- /* Don't frown. * Don't complain. * Don't touch yourself. */ Yours. Dasn |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-29 11:48:44
|
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:12:58 +0800, "Dasn Cups" <da...@us...> said: > > When we do a 'diff' between V6.1 and V6.2, we will get a real _big_ > report. :-O hmmm. I've been reviewing the translated docs for awhile and I've always been checking against the 6.2 docs. I've yet to see big differences. Any example? > > > I am not sure I understand you fully. But yes we should be all working on > > 6.2 docs. > > Really? I had thought that our project would have kept track of vimdoc > (vimdoc.sf.net) project. :-) What? -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again |
|
From: Dasn C. <da...@us...> - 2003-09-29 22:52:05
|
> hmmm. I've been reviewing the translated docs for awhile and I've always > been checking against the 6.2 docs. I've yet to see big differences. > Any example? You are right, if we were just talking about the docs we finished. All in all, the user manual changes little, but the reference manual doesn't. ( e.g. in Ver6.2, new items added to gui_w32.txt, etc ) -- /* Don't frown. * Don't complain. * Don't touch yourself. */ |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-30 10:46:58
|
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:51:19 +0800, "Dasn Cups" <da...@us...> said: > You are right, if we were just talking about the docs we finished. All > in all, the user manual changes little, but the reference manual > doesn't. ( e.g. in Ver6.2, new items added to gui_w32.txt, etc ) OK then. I didn't notice that. And that is why I changed the project description to 6.x to allow a mixture of 6.1 and 6.2 document to coexist. When I review documents, I only changed the version number after I go through the full translation. So maybe the rule should be: 1. If any new document is to be translated, start from a 6.2 one. 2. Any translated ones remain as it is until it is reviewed _and_ updated against 6.2 version. Is this approach OK? I think installing a mixtur of 6.1 and 6.2 documentation is OK because 6.2 is mainly a bug fix release and not many new features are introduced. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail |
|
From: James He <ic...@us...> - 2003-10-03 04:59:02
|
> 1. If any new document is to be translated, start from a 6.2 one. > 2. Any translated ones remain as it is until it is reviewed _and_ > updated against 6.2 version. > > Is this approach OK? Quite OK, I think. ;-) Best regards, -- James He <ic...@us...> |
|
From: James He <ic...@us...> - 2003-09-29 11:31:17
|
I am also working on the vim 6.2 docs then could i leave the version no. '6.2' at the head of each doc(rather tha= n change it to 6.1 manually)? on Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:54:39 -0800=20 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > Hi Zimin, >=20 > Sorry about the late reply. I wasn't checking my mail during the weekend. > I see you've finished gui_x11.txt. Great job! >=20 > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:31:09 +0800, "=B2=CC =D7=CF=95F" <caizimin@hotmail.= com> > said: > > Dear Liang=A3=AC > > I need your help. Now I use the gvim 6.2. I need the gvim6.1 doc > > file.=20 > > can you give me? Thank you.=20 > No. You don't need that. You can go directly to the 6.2 docs. They are=20 > more update to date. And there arn't many changes anyway. For the one=20 > you have done, don't worry about that. That's quite OK. >=20 > > And I have a suggestion. I think the whether we can add some files= =20 > > which have NOT occured in cvs with the version 6.2. I found you have=20 > > modifed the file to v6.2. I can directly go on to the v6.2. Do you thin= k=20 > > so? > I am not sure I understand you fully. But yes we should be all working on= =20 > 6.2 docs. >=20 Best regards, --=20 James He <ic...@us...> |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-29 11:37:05
|
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:29:14 +0800, "James He" <ic...@us...> said: > I am also working on the vim 6.2 docs > then could i leave the version no. '6.2' at the head of each doc(rather > than change it to 6.1 manually)? Sure. The text which are not part of the translation should be best kept _unchanged_. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X