Menu
▾
▴
vimcdoc-translate
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2004-07-22 17:05:42
|
Anybody wants to do this? wandys? The html on sf is automatically updated but I believer there are *much* more reader of the cosoft pages. So it is more important to keep that up to date. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... |
|
From: xxxss <xx...@ms...> - 2004-07-23 06:26:48
|
change them to UTF-8?? -- xxxss <xx...@ms...> |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2004-07-24 12:55:24
|
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:13:43 +0800, "xxxss" <xx...@ms...> said: > change them to UTF-8?? Not only that. The html version is just a conversion from the txt version. I believe what is on cosoft at the moment is based on vimcdoc 0.6.0 (or 0.6.1). 0.7.0 had a lot of changes, including the charset. So it would be nice to get the HTML version in sync with CVS, even those on the wiki page if at all possible. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... |
|
From: Alecs K. <al...@pe...> - 2004-07-23 08:07:13
|
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:05:38PM +0100, Simon Liang wrote: > Anybody wants to do this? wandys? > > The html on sf is automatically updated but I believer there > are *much* more reader of the cosoft pages. So it is more > important to keep that up to date. My bad. Cosoft doesnt provide ssh access anymore. Only ftp allowed. I had been too lazy to write some scripts to auto upload files since. Just wrote 2 scripts. Now files uploaded. Check them out: http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/usr_toc.html http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/help.html Regards, -- Alecs King |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2004-07-24 12:59:18
|
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:07:47 +0800, "Alecs King" <al...@pe...> said: > > My bad. Cosoft doesnt provide ssh access anymore. Only ftp allowed. I > had been too lazy to write some scripts to auto upload files since. > > Just wrote 2 scripts. Now files uploaded. Check them out: > > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/usr_toc.html > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/help.html Good. I am not sure how the ftp upload work. But it would be nice if the upload can be integrated with 'aap', as what is done for SF. That would allow automation of the task and we will never (only cosoft change its policy again that is) have to worry about it again. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... |
|
From: Alecs K. <al...@pe...> - 2004-07-24 14:04:05
|
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 01:59:16PM +0100, Simon Liang wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:07:47 +0800, "Alecs King" <al...@pe...> > said: > > > > My bad. Cosoft doesnt provide ssh access anymore. Only ftp allowed. I > > had been too lazy to write some scripts to auto upload files since. > > > > Just wrote 2 scripts. Now files uploaded. Check them out: > > > > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/usr_toc.html > > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/doc/help.html > > Good. I am not sure how the ftp upload work. But it would be nice if > the upload can be integrated with 'aap', as what is done for SF. That > would allow automation of the task and we will never (only cosoft > change its policy again that is) have to worry about it again. Just a Makefile and a shell script. I'm not familiar with aap and cant view its website (blocked?). Just glanced at the .app files in our project and it looked to me much like Makefiles. Maybe I need a proxy.. -- Alecs King |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2004-07-26 11:25:23
|
> > Just a Makefile and a shell script. I'm not familiar with aap and cant > view its website (blocked?). Just glanced at the .app files in our > project and it looked to me much like Makefiles. It is a better make at the least. It has buil-in webpage uploading and ftp uploding, through python. You can use makefile if you want to. I remember you had a 'VCD' module in the repository. If you decided to use makefile, can you check those scripts in? Just to keep them tracked. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... |
|
From: Alecs K. <al...@pe...> - 2004-07-26 16:51:48
|
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:25:16PM +0100, Simon Liang wrote: > > > > Just a Makefile and a shell script. I'm not familiar with aap and cant > > view its website (blocked?). Just glanced at the .app files in our > > project and it looked to me much like Makefiles. > > It is a better make at the least. It has buil-in webpage uploading and > ftp uploding, through python. Just played with aap for a while. Not quite impressive. IMHO, make has better dependency handling and more clearer syntax. As for built-ins, i appreciate the Make's way: let those 'high' level things be done thru outside tools. > > You can use makefile if you want to. I remember you had a 'VCD' > module in the repository. If you decided to use makefile, can you > check those scripts in? Just to keep them tracked. Done. Under VCD/VCD/htdocs/doc/, Makefile & upload.sh. PS, for those who cant view http://www.a-a-p.org, try http://a-a-p.sf.net/ Regards, -- Alecs King |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2004-07-27 11:28:43
|
> > Just played with aap for a while. Not quite impressive. :-( > IMHO, make has > better dependency handling and more clearer syntax. Better dependency handling? You mean the lack of auto dependency checking? In fairness, how many time have you wondered: 'am I building everything I should' and do 'make clean && make '? > > As for built-ins, i appreciate the Make's way: let those 'high' level > things be done thru outside tools. The fact that 'make' depends _entirely_ on the shell makes it unportable. IMHO, using a fully-featured language such as python as the engine is a much better choice. But anyways, we degress. As long as there is automation, I wouldn't mind. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X