Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] Debian package for vimcdoc

[Carlos Z.F. L. <car...@us...>]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:49:50AM +0100, Wenzhi Liang wrote:
> That's good news. We've already have a BSD port and now a debian
> package. Very good. I'll include a link to it on our website
> shortly. Is [1] the final URL? Of course you can upload it to the
> official Debian archive. I havn't had a chance to look at the
> package myself but I will.
> 
Ok, I'm happy that I can contribute something to this project since I
like vim and like vimcdoc even more. This URL is just an place in Debian
Chinese community. I will put the newest unoffical packages in there
(such as 0.7.9, I found it in list 2 min ago ^_^). Once the package is
uploaded to official Debian archive, I will notify you in the list.

> Yes. License. Not familiar with the DFSG (you meant 2. yes?). So I
> don't know what the definition of free there is. I have been
> thinking about license myself lately, mainly the possibility and
> impact of changing it to an existing free license (FDL or
> something). But I've been lazy about this I guess. But I suppose
> you can put it under non-free until things changed.
> 
In Debian community, the definition of free documents is already very
problematic. Currently, even GFDL is considered as non-free. @_@ I'm
happy with vimcdoc, but as what you said, I think it's better to switch
to an existing full-bloated lawyer-writed license. :)

-- 
 Best Regards,
 Carlos