Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] Re: Re: about the new vimcdoc.sh in 0.7.0

[Simon L. <wzh...@sp...>]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:54:42 +0800, "Alecs King" <al...@pe...>
said:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:48:13PM +0100, Simon Liang wrote:
> > 
> > > E.g. Here on FreeBSD (5.2-current), vim is installed to
> > > /usr/local/share/vim/vim63/ with no 'vimfiles' sub-directory. 
> > By default or when you compile your own Vim?
> 
> Installed it from ports.

Just curious. What is installed in /usr/ by default on FreeBSD? 

> 
> :h rt shows that on UNIX $HOME/.vim, $VIM/vimfiles, $VIMRUNTIME,
> $VIM/vimfiles/after and $HOME/.vim/after are all okay.
> 
> Correct me if i'm wrong:
> All has $VIMRUNTIME, but not all has $VIM/vimfiles. So why not just
> detect and use $VIMRUNTIME?

My idea is that if user uninstall/reinstall/upgrade his/her Vim, vimcdoc 
should be left alone. Installing in one of the .../vimfiles directory 
have this benifit. Overkill?

> 
> I think that would be okay.
Can you do that and test it on your BSD system please? 

Thanks,


lang2
-- 
  Simon Liang
  wzh...@sp...