Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] Re: about the new vimcdoc.sh in 0.7.0

[Simon L. <wzh...@sp...>]

> E.g. Here on FreeBSD (5.2-current), vim is installed to
> /usr/local/share/vim/vim63/ with no 'vimfiles' sub-directory. 
By default or when you compile your own Vim?

> I think
> it's better to check $VIMRUNTIME to support various vim installations.
System wide installation can only reside in $VIM/vimfiles/doc. That is 
the only make-sense location. So maybe we can detect whether Vim 
is installed in /usr or /usr/local

> > hmm. The only reason I choosed /usr is because it has a better chance of
> > 'work
> > out of box'. What would you prefer? Auto-detection?
> > 
> 
> I dunno if it's a (loose?) convention. But usually all those manually
> installed software goes to /usr/local/share. (That is, default prefix is
> /usr/local). Not a big deal, anyway.

Yes. That is the convention and is exactly the reason why I choose /usr
instead of /usr/local: only a small portion of user will compile his own
Vim.
So the user's Vim is more likely to be in /usr. Anyway, I think it is OK
to
do a 'which vim' for auto-detection. Is that OK?

> 
> 
> 3) The '-D' option of 'install' is a GNU/Linux style option, whereas
> BSD install does not have this option but '-d' instead.
> (Back to use mkdir & cp?)

hmm. I never used BSD myself. What if we 'mkdir' explicitely and leave
out the '-D' ?



lang2
-- 
  Simon Liang
  wzh...@sp...