Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] Re: <No Subject>

[Simon L. <wzh...@sp...>]

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:51:19 +0800, "Dasn Cups"
<da...@us...> said:
> You are right, if we were just talking about the docs we finished. All
> in all, the user manual changes little, but the reference manual
> doesn't. ( e.g. in Ver6.2, new items added to gui_w32.txt, etc )

OK then. I didn't notice that. And that is why I changed the project 
description to 6.x to allow a mixture of 6.1 and 6.2 document to 
coexist. When I review documents, I only changed the version number 
after I go through the full translation. So maybe the rule should be:
1. If any new document is to be translated, start from a 6.2 one.
2. Any translated ones remain as it is until it is reviewed _and_
   updated against 6.2 version.

Is this approach OK? 
I think installing a mixtur of 6.1 and 6.2 documentation is OK because
6.2 is mainly a bug fix release and not many new features are introduced.


lang2
-- 
  Simon Liang
  wzh...@sp...

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail