Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] Re: <No Subject>

[James He <ic...@us...>]

I am also working on the vim 6.2 docs
then could i leave the version no. '6.2' at the head of each doc(rather tha=
n change it to 6.1 manually)?

on Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:54:39 -0800=20
"Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote:

> Hi Zimin,
>=20
> Sorry about the late reply. I wasn't checking my mail during the weekend.
> I see you've finished gui_x11.txt. Great job!
>=20
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:31:09 +0800, "=B2=CC =D7=CF=95F" <caizimin@hotmail.=
com>
> said:
> > Dear Liang=A3=AC
> >     I need your help. Now I use the gvim 6.2. I need the gvim6.1 doc
> >     file.=20
> > can you give me? Thank you.=20
> No. You don't need that. You can go directly to the 6.2 docs. They are=20
> more update to date. And there arn't many changes anyway. For the one=20
> you have done, don't worry about that. That's quite OK.
>=20
> >     And I have a suggestion. I think the whether we can add some files=
=20
> > which have NOT occured in cvs with the version 6.2. I found you have=20
> > modifed the file to v6.2. I can directly go on to the v6.2. Do you thin=
k=20
> > so?
> I am not sure I understand you fully. But yes we should be all working on=
=20
> 6.2 docs.
>=20

Best regards,

--=20
James He <ic...@us...>