Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] (no subject)

[wandys <al...@so...>]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:01:54 -0800
"Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote:

> > Seems i was too hasty..
> 
> Indeed it was. SF have changed their CVS server configuration
> and I had to wait about 2 days to make this release. And by 
> the time I did, I had no patience.
> 
> > 
> > I updated the data/Makefile, along with data/www/Makefile to fix all
> > this and to make it work smoothly on BSD.  Correct me if somewhere
> > i'm wrong.
> 
> Did you check them in?

Yes, i committed the changes yesterday.

> 
> > 
> > Anyway, have to build the tarball again... 0.4.0 doesnt come out so
> > easy..
> Do we need a new 0.4.0 tarball? Is it too much hassel? I think non of
> the bugs are show-stoppers. Can we live with them and wait for a week
> or two for a .1 or .2 release?
> 

Well, no serious problems.  It's just that there's no 'doc/CVS' dir
inside.

I made a new tarball using the new Makefile yesterday[doc/CVS included]:

http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/download/vimcdoc-0.4.0.tar.gz