Re: [Vimcdoc-translate] scope of vimcdoc project

[lang2 <wzh...@po...>]

> 
> >     Who would read ref manual anyway? For those who
> > need to read ref manual, English should not be
> > problem.
> 
> I think a lot of ppl would read the ref manual, yet not in the same way
> they would read the user manual.

Agreed. That's exactly why Vim would have two sets of 
documentation. Well, not really two sets, but you got the
idea. Ref manual are intended to be read after the 
usr_??.txt. They are more thourough thus harder to read and 
translate. :(. Actually because of this, I think it is (in 
a way) more important to translate those. 

Please let use all discuss about this if you wish.

Ken? What were you thinking when you first started this
project?


Of course, there should be priority of various documents.
Things which are rarelly used should be considered at the
last. At this stage, the usr_??.txt are more or less done.
(There aren't many of them.) It sure is a very good idea
to get them translated and get them translated right. 

Rgds,


lang2