From: lang2 <wzh...@po...> - 2002-12-17 10:26:30
|
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:14:19 -0800 (PST) > the current flows. Supprisingly, Chinese physicists > had never corrected this and came up with a better > term. Which kinda explains why we are having this discussion - it is not *that* easy for find a better one. I think 'kaiqi' and 'guanbi' will do for the moment.... saidly maybe. |