From: Leslie J. <cew...@16...> - 2002-11-27 12:02:32
|
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:16:57 +0000 "lang2 " <wzh...@po...> wrote: > > > > I've already noticed this. They have been included in Ken's > > original work and they're normally at the beginning of some lines. > > I think they are not the diff stuff but sort of particular things > > used for coloring. It may be somewhat weird but if you removed them > > the words between that'>' and '<' wouldn't be color-syntaxed any > > more. > > Oops. Indeed they are in Ken's translation. However, > they are not in the Vim documentation. I've taken a close look at the original English texts finding that there're also '>'s in the context. (often following the colon at the end of the line) Seems they are necessary for coloring. -- Leslie Jackson |