Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:18:23AM -0500, Carl Mueller wrote:
>
>>This is a plea for vim-latex to support ams-latex. It is
>>one of the main packages that mathematicians use, and is
>>indicated by
>>\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amsfonts}
>>(along with other possible options such as "amsthm", "amsfonts")
>>vim-latex is certainly a step forward! Thanks to everyone
>>involved.
>
>
> Hmm. Most(?) of special math signs provided by ams-latex are provided
> with Math menu (and probably they stay there). Problem is with
> environments and other things. I will do it in next few days. Is
> amsguide.pdf good as a reference (I don't know ams-latex)?
I think that amsguide.* is a reference for AMS-TeX; we want
AMS-LaTeX. I have not figured out where (if anywhere) the latex docs
are put by Red Hat, but on my CTAN CD I found
/mnt/cdrom/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/amsldoc.tex
which looks like the right documentation. If you have "A Guide to
LaTeX" (Kopka and Daly) then you can also look in Appendix E.
And yes, I think the issue is environments, etc, not changes in
math mode (although there are a few of those, such as \text{}).
--Benji
|
