Thread: [Vim-latex-devel] ``''<<>>
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
From: Fabio S. <fab...@ti...> - 2002-12-20 09:51:56
|
:) Hello What about to implement that fine stuff of <<>> (sorry if I "name" it this way :) ) also for the couple of `` and '' ? I'll found it really useful! Thanx and happy living -- Fabio Spelta email: fab...@ti... jabber: fe...@ja... ecdl project: http://ecdllibre.sf.net |
From: Benji F. <be...@me...> - 2002-12-20 15:13:32
|
Fabio Spelta wrote: > :) > > Hello > > What about to implement that fine stuff of <<>> (sorry if I "name" it > this way :) ) also for the couple of `` and '' ? I'll found it really > useful! > > Thanx and happy living I am not sure what "fine stuff" you mean. We will soon release a version where you may use "<<" and ">>" or "``" and "''" or any other markers you like. You already get "``" and "''" by typing " (and you can customize this if you do not want English-style quotation marks). Are you looking for a way to jump to ``strings like this'' or something? HTH --Benji |
From: Fabio S. <fab...@ti...> - 2002-12-20 15:26:03
|
What I meant was to press " twice, and obtain not just ``'' (with the cursor at the end ot that) but ``''<<>> with the cursor between `` and '', and the chance to jump out with ctrl-J ! Sorry if my previous mail was not clear Thank you! |
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2002-12-22 19:02:38
|
Hey Fabio, Benji implemented the new feature. I have uploaded the latest version which includes this. Srinath On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Fabio Spelta wrote: > What I meant was > > to press " twice, and obtain not just ``'' (with the cursor at the end > ot that) but ``''<<>> with the cursor between `` and '', and the chance > to jump out with ctrl-J ! > > Sorry if my previous mail was not clear > > Thank you! > |
From: Fabio S. <fab...@ti...> - 2002-12-29 22:11:14
|
Srinath Avadhanula wrote: >Hey Fabio, > >Benji implemented the new feature. I have uploaded the latest version >which includes this. > > Cool guys, thank you all! Hope this will be useful to others and not only to mine, of course ! Sorry for being so late in reply, I vas on vacation. Thanx again and a wonderful happy new year to you all! |
From: Benji F. <be...@me...> - 2002-12-21 14:57:01
|
> What I meant was > > to press " twice, and obtain not just ``'' (with the cursor at the end > ot that) but ``''<<>> with the cursor between `` and '', and the chance > to jump out with ctrl-J ! > > Sorry if my previous mail was not clear > > Thank you! That is a possibility. It would require modifying s:TexQuotes() in main.vim, and adding another option. --Benji |
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2002-12-22 02:25:29
|
I like Fabio's suggestion. If no one else is interested, I will add this feature. I dont think I'll add the option straight away. I dont think I'll add the option right now. Srinath On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Benji Fisher wrote: > > What I meant was > > > > to press " twice, and obtain not just ``'' (with the cursor at the end > > ot that) but ``''<<>> with the cursor between `` and '', and the chance > > to jump out with ctrl-J ! > > > > Sorry if my previous mail was not clear > > > > Thank you! > > That is a possibility. It would require modifying s:TexQuotes() > in main.vim, and adding another option. > > --Benji |
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2002-12-22 12:21:22
|
I took a look at main.vim to implement this feature, but unfortunately, couldn't quite understand the Tex_Quotes() function! :( A simple look back for g:Tex_SmartQuoteOpen and inserting '<++>'.g:Tex_SmartQuoteClose.'<++>' on a successful test doesn't seem to work straight away because there seems to be a fair bit of moving around in the file for finding out the quotes... I would think that Benji would be able to do this much more easily because he has implemented this... If I were to implement this, I would have to spend a fair bit of time figuring out whats going on... and then I get tempted to change things around to my liking... Srinath On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Srinath Avadhanula wrote: > > I like Fabio's suggestion. If no one else is interested, I will add this > feature. I dont think I'll add the option straight away. I dont think > I'll add the option right now. > > Srinath > |