Re: [Vim-latex-devel] SPAM again
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2003-12-04 00:01:02
|
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Preben Randhol wrote: > How many post exactly do you get from people that are not in the list? > I don't buy this argument. It seems to me that the only purpose this > policy servers is to allow a bunch of spam messages to get in. > Actually, a _lot_ of very useful e-mail to the list comes from people not subscribed. For example, recently there were quite a lof of new very useful features added to the folding scheme... I think you might have noticed a few e-mails between Zhang Linbo and myself regarding this. Linbo is not subscribed to the list... But he has written some extremeley helpful e-mails including submitting patches etc. So has Alex Jakushev... again very helpful e-mails which include helpful patches... These are just examples from the last week or so. In general I do find that lots of non-subscribers write useful emails to the list. Even when they do not submit patches, 95% of the people who submit bug reports are not subscribed... I would hate to create a barrier of entry for them since that would mean that the vim-latex developement would suffer. > Can you please reconsider? Make a form on your web-page that people can > fill out if they have problems. Then this result can be mailed to a > moderator before inclusion in the mailinglist. It isn't hard and it > would save the rest of us a lot of very annoying spam. I would _really_ welcome the suggestion if someone agrees to moderate. I unfortunately, have no time or inclination for doing this. I am already swamped with too many things to do to take something as tedious as this upon myself. If you wish, you could moderate :-) (seriously...) Quite frankly though, I would suggest setting up some good anti-spam software on your system... I am seriously thinking of setting up spambayes myself, but again, haven't had time... Sorry about the pain, I feel it every day... :( Srinath |