Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Revolution! :)
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
From: Srinath A. <sr...@fa...> - 2003-09-26 01:46:46
|
Hello! Unfortunately, I am really busy nowadays with some studying. I have a big oral examination coming up in the next few weeks and I have promised myself that I will not be doing any coding till after the exam is done. On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 mi...@wp... wrote: > OK. Subject is exaggeration, but not so much. > Sounds unimpressive but it allow for creating real distribution > packages and real *nix behaviour with system wide files and local > modifications. I am dusting off 'man rpm' ;) > :) The changes sound excellent. I will incorporate them into the tree as soon as I get back. > Jokes aside. There are still issues: creating menus is based on list > returned by globpath(). How to sort endresults and remove duplicate > entries? I remember long discussions on vim-list about Sort and Uniq. I do not think we want to remove duplicates. After all, how do we know that $VIM/ftplugin/latex-suite/packages/amsmath.vim is the same as $VIM/ftplugin/latex-suite/packages/amsmath.vim? Hmmm... Maybe have a single menu item for amsmath but source every ftplugin/latex-suite/packages/packages.vim in the runtimepath... just a simple: runtime! ftplugin/latex-suite/amsmath.vim > (after win-test) with Tex_file_rtp() in main.vim? I can proceed with > implementation for templates and macros. I thought we had decided on the CamelCase convention for function names. Could you please follow the convention as well? I am kinda anal about being consistent :) Please! Let me recap: 1. Code according to the following modeline: vim:noet:sw=4:ts=4 2. Follow CamelCase for function names, variable names etc. 3. Function names should be verbs. For example, if Tex_file_rtp() is supposed to find a file in 'rtp', use Tex_FindInRTP() instead of Tex_file_rtp(). 4. Variable names should be nouns as far as possible. Anyway, please try to maintain this convention... Srinath |