Re: [Vim-latex-devel] how is texrc processed ?

[Benji F. <be...@me...>]

Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm playing with some options of the local copy of my texrc (the one in
> ftplugin/tex), and some things do not work. For instance, I used to have
> in my .vimrc the following:
> let g:Tex_IgnoredWarnings =
> 	\'Underfull¡'.
> 	\'Overfull¡'.
> 	\'specifier changed to¡'.
> 	\'You have requested¡'.
> 	\'Missing number, treated as zero.¡'.
> 	\'There were undefined references¡'.
> 	\'Citation %.%# undefined¡'.
> 	\'LaTeX Font Warning¡'
> 
> It worked as planned. I discovered I could put it in the texrc as:
> TexLet g:Tex_IgnoredWarnings =
> 	\'Underfull¡'.
> 	\'Overfull¡'.
> 	\'specifier changed to¡'.
> 	\'You have requested¡'.
> 	\'Missing number, treated as zero.¡'.
> 	\'There were undefined references¡'.
> 	\'Citation %.%# undefined¡'.
> 	\'LaTeX Font Warning¡'
> 
> But it does not work (ie I still get "LaTeX Font" warnings). It's as if
> some other texrc was overriding this one.
> 
> What am I doing wrong here ?

      I am not sure what is going on, but I can tell you what :TexLet does. 
(This command is defined in texrc .)  It checks whether the variable is already 
defined.  If it is, :TexLet does nothing; if the variable is not already 
defined, :TexLet acts like :let .  In other words, the first use of :TexLet 
wins, whereas the last use of :let wins.

      What should happen is that the user texrc is read before the default 
texrc, so that the user's :TexLet is effective.  Of course, your vimrc file gets 
read long before either texrc.  You can check that the texrc files are read in 
the right order by using

:scriptnames

      I hope that points you in the right direction.

					--Benji Fisher