Re: [Vim-latex-devel] packages.vim

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hey Diego,

Thanks for the valuable feedback!

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Diego Caraffini wrote:

> \includegraphics[]{}{}
>
> [snip]
>
> \includegraphics[]{}
>
> [snip]
>
> so that you do not end up with increasing length command specifications
> (ex. CommandSpec_noobbb).
>
> I hope this can be useful.
>
I think the problem was not with packages.vim but with
packages/graphicx. You'll notice that in packages/grapchicx we define
g:Tex_package_grapchicx to contain 'nob:includegraphics'. The problem
can be solved if we make it 'brs:includegraphics[<++>]{<++>}'

> \usepackage[options]{graphicx}
>
> EFI will use the \includegraphics command instead of the default  \psfig
> ?
> Or it is alredy possible?

The basic mechanism to accomplish this is there... I will make a patch
to accomplish this behavior today... I'll let you know when its ready.

Thanks,

Srinath