[Vim-latex-devel] Re: new version of imaps.vim

[Luc H. <her...@fr...>]

* On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:38:10PM -0800, Srinath Avadhanula <sr...@fa...> wrote:
> This is bad! We have a problem with vim's limitation of only letting
> functions take upto 20 arguments...

Is it the same with commands ?


> call Tex_IMAP('EPI', "\\begin{picture}(<+width+>, <+height+>)"
>                 \ . "(<+xoff+>,<+yoff+>)\<cr>\\put(<+xoff+>,<+yoff+>)"
>                 \ . "{\\framebox(<++>,<++>){<++>}}\<cr>\\end{picture}<++>",
>                 \ 'tex')
> creates more than 20 arguments!

> So... Whats the hack around it?

template-files ?
Moreover, it is easier for the end user to configure -- if he needs to.

> [encoding]
> Another thing to note: There seem to be a lot of patches in vim 6.0
> towards MB chars... Therefore, maybe we should only test on vim 6.0
> w/o patches henceforth, so we have the safest...

I ran Benji's `experiment' on Gvim-win32 6.1-263 on MsWindows Me.
And I get the same result he did.


-- 
Luc Hermitte
http://hermitte.free.fr/vim/