Re: [Vim-latex-devel] which github repository is more official?

[Ted P. <te...@te...>]

Peng -

git is git regardless of the host. Moreover, sf provides much more than
just a repo to the latex suite. How has sf caused you trouble using the
official git repo hosted there?

Or are you just saying it would be easier for you to submit pull requests
rather than patches? Note that git itself is maintained via patches posted
to a mailing list rather than pull requests via github. Or do you just like
that LinkedIn provides a module for showing off your latex suite
contributions?

Why don't you just setup a clone on github that automatically pulls from
the sf git repo?

Or are you saying that there are already so many clones by people not
accustomed to anything but pull requests that the latex suite is getting
fragmented? (despite all the documentation hooks back to sf)

--Ted

--
Sent from the mobile device of Ted Pavlic
Please excuse typos, swypos, or very brief responses
On Jun 30, 2012 2:30 PM, "Peng Yu" <pen...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have the feeling that sf sucks. Many developers has already been
> setting up github repositories. But it is not clear to me which one is
> the most official. I think that it is time to migrate the development
> to github and maintain a central repository there. Is there one that
> is the most official in giihub?
>
> https://github.com/jcf/vim-latex
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peng
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Vim-latex-devel mailing list
> Vim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel
>