Re: [Vfs-devel] class.DBI

[Tony K. <tk...@ca...>]

> > Why not look at integrating all of the database code from db_wrapper.inc
> > into class.DBI structure? We can just add all needed code to the DBD
files.
> > All of the databases we want to support already have DBD files. We could
> > possibly drop some_database_wrapper.inc and db_wrapper.inc files all
> > together. Just move that code to the necessary class.DBD::some_database
> > files.
>
> Well, I know it would really leave db_wrapper.inc to do much execept
actually
> make the database connection. However, there may be some things like
dealing
> with sequences and dates. My main reason for leaving it separate though is
> that if there are any changes make to class.DBI we can just plug in the
new
> class.DBI without having to apply all our changes again. I would prefer to
> keep things as compartmentalised as possible.
>

DOH! Damn fine point there! Thank god I'm not the only one on this team :)

Regards,
Tony Kirk