|
From: Eskil S. <es...@in...> - 2002-06-06 14:52:37
|
> > First of all it means that Power PC doesn't suck even at half the > > Mhz of the Athlon, but we already knew that. > > Well, we knew it, but didn't think it should be faster. What compilers > are yyou using? MS VC++ on Windows, and gcc under Mac OS X? Are you > running the debug or release build on Windows? Any optimization under > Mac OS X? None of them running in debug mode, both with full optimization. > > Radion is faster then Gforce (i have tried on 2 Gforce machine and 3 > > ATI machines and the performance is always better on the ATI > > systems) This is kind of strange since Gforce should be slightly > > faster although Radion has a more consistent performance. Especially > > strange since I wrote the engine after Nvidias performance Guide > > lines. > > Yeah, that's kinda weird too, but I'm a bit out of the loop on graphics > boards now. ATi's R300 sounds promising, though. If it's good enough for > Carmack... :D If ATI can get their drivers in the know, they will eventually take Nvidia. (also remember that Nvidia makes the Media chip set in X-Box, while ATI makes "Flipper", the media chip in Game Cube. And the Game Cube has sold a lot better then X-box si i think ATI will get some financial power to strike out Nvidia, But also look out for 3DLabs, Martrox, Kryo and Sony who may one day show up with great products (3DLabs will most likely have the first OpenGL 2.0 card)) E |