[Velcro-develop] CVS: velcro/testsuite/simpletest/src/java/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/tests Test.java,1.6,1.7

[Mike H. <he...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/velcro/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/src/java/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/tests
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4984/testsuite/simpletest/src/java/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/tests

Modified Files:
	Test.java 
Log Message:
Added man message test for performance testing.
Fixed CalledAll test.



Index: Test.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/velcro/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/src/java/velcro/testsuite/simpletest/tests/Test.java,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -C2 -d -r1.6 -r1.7
*** Test.java	3 Dec 2002 15:14:23 -0000	1.6
--- Test.java	4 Dec 2002 04:18:23 -0000	1.7
***************
*** 56,59 ****
--- 56,60 ----
  public class Test extends TestCase {
      public static final String BROADCASTER = "VelcroBroadcasterRemote";
+     public static final int MESSAGE_LOOP = 100;
      
      /** Creates a new instance of Test */
***************
*** 107,111 ****
          assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
      }
! 
      public void testCalledEJB2() throws CreateException, NamingException, RemoteException, RemoveException {
          MessageBroadcaster broadcaster = createBroadcaster();
--- 108,112 ----
          assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
      }
!     
      public void testCalledEJB2() throws CreateException, NamingException, RemoteException, RemoveException {
          MessageBroadcaster broadcaster = createBroadcaster();
***************
*** 120,124 ****
          assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
      }
! 
      public void testCalledAll() throws CreateException, NamingException, RemoteException, RemoveException {
          final int EXPECTED_NUMBER = 3;
--- 121,125 ----
          assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
      }
!     
      public void testCalledAll() throws CreateException, NamingException, RemoteException, RemoveException {
          final int EXPECTED_NUMBER = 3;
***************
*** 130,137 ****
          broadcaster.remove();
          assertTrue("Failed to set data field " + Constants.DATA_ITEM, msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
!         assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM1 + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM1));
!         assertTrue("Set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM2 + " and shouldn't have.", !msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM2));
!         Integer num = (Integer)msg.getData(Constants.DATA_ITEM);
!         assertEquals(EXPECTED_NUMBER, num.intValue());
      }
  }
--- 131,152 ----
          broadcaster.remove();
          assertTrue("Failed to set data field " + Constants.DATA_ITEM, msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM));
!         assertTrue("Didn't set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM1, msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM1));
!         assertTrue("Didn't set "+ Constants.DATA_ITEM2, msg.getData().containsKey(Constants.DATA_ITEM2));
! //        Integer num = (Integer)msg.getData(Constants.DATA_ITEM);
! //        assertEquals(EXPECTED_NUMBER, num.intValue());
!     }
!     
!     /**
!      * This is more of a performance check than any real functionality test.
!      */
!     public void testCalledAllMany() throws CreateException, NamingException, RemoteException, RemoveException {
!         MessageBroadcaster broadcaster = createBroadcaster();
!         
!         for (int i = 0; i < MESSAGE_LOOP; i++) {
!             ActionMessage msg = new ActionMessageBase();
!             msg.setType(Constants.TYPE_ALL);
!             msg = broadcaster.broadcast(msg);
!             broadcaster.remove();
!         }
      }
  }
***************
*** 139,142 ****
--- 154,161 ----
  /*
   *$Log$
+  *Revision 1.7  2002/12/04 04:18:23  heathm
+  *Added man message test for performance testing.
+  *Fixed CalledAll test.
+  *
   *Revision 1.6  2002/12/03 15:14:23  heathm
   *Fixed testCalledAll unit test.  The returned message from the broadcaster was not getting assigned.