Menu
▾
▴
vectorlinux-devel
|
From: John <joh...@gm...> - 2006-12-19 03:36:25
|
I was going to upgrade my VL 5.8 RC 2 to final using slapt-get --dist-upgrade. To see what would happen if I did so, I entered the following version of the slapt-get command (yes, I did have the latest slapt-getrc): VL58STDRC2://home/john root:# slapt-get -s --dist-upgrade That version of the command simulates what would happen. There are four areas of concern below. I will intersperse my comments with the output from slapt-get --dist-upgrade: Reading Package Lists... Done Excluding vl-hot, use --ignore-dep to override Excluding vcpufreq, use --ignore-dep to override Excluding goffice, use --ignore-dep to override Excluding abiword, use --ignore-dep to override Excluding frozen-bubble, use --ignore-dep to override The following packages have unmet dependencies: vl-hot: Depends: gambas-runtime_full >= 1.0.15 | gambas >= 1.0.15 vcpufreq: Depends: gambas >= 1.0.15 goffice: Depends: freetype >= 2.2.1 The issue here is that freetype 2.2.1 is not in the VL 5.8 repository. Unless there was a compelling reason to upgrade from 2.1.9 to 2.2.1, this item is going to cause issues unless I use the --ignore-dep switch to do the dist-upgrade. abiword: Depends: x11-base >= 7.1 This is an even BIGGER issue. We don't have x 7.1 in the repository. I hope this package works correctly under x 6.9.0, which is what is on VL 5.8. While it's nice for us to be able to play with xorg 7.1, until it is officially in the repository, do NOT build ANY packages that link against xorg 7.1. Otherwise, slapt-get will complain. frozen-bubble: Depends: perl-gettext >= 1.0.5-noarch-1vl58 Is perl-gettext in the main repo, or is it in testing? I'll need to check. The following packages have been EXCLUDED: vl-hot vcpufreq goffice abiword frozen-bubble The following NEW packages will be installed: ntfs-3g ntfsprogs sharutils sshfs-fuse vlconfig2 The following packages will be upgraded: cups fuse xpdf libgpg-error parted libgcrypt ndiswrapper a52dec VL5.8 Mesa smpeg htop grsync SDL_Perl gaim xine-ui xine-lib xfce xfprint MPlayer 20 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 34MB of archives. After unpacking 51MB of additional disk space will be used. cups-1.2.4-i586-2vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.2.6-i586-2vl58 fuse-2.5.3-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 2.6.1-i586-3vl58 ntfs-3g-20061212-i586-2vl58 is to be installed ntfsprogs-1.13.1-i586-4vl58 is to be installed sharutils-4.6.3-i486-1 is to be installed sshfs-fuse-1.7-i586-1vl58 is to be installed vlconfig2-5.8-i586-1vl58 is to be installed xpdf-3.01-i486-4 is to be upgraded to version 3.01-i586-4vl58 libgpg-error-1.0-i486-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.3-i586-2vl58 parted-1.6.25.1-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.8.0-i586-4vl58 libgcrypt-1.2.1-i486-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.2.1-i586-4vl58 ndiswrapper-1.23_2.6.17.13-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.29_2.6.17.13-i586-1vl58 a52dec-0.7.4-i486-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 0.7.4-i586-4vl58 VL5.8-initscipts-noarch-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version initscripts-noarch-4vl58 Mesa-6.5.1-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 6.5.1-i586-5vl58 smpeg-0.4.4-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 0.4.5.cvs.2006.11.29-i586-1vl58 htop-0.6.4-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 0.6.5-i586-1vl58 grsync-0.1-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 0.5-i586-4vl58 SDL_Perl-2.1.3-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 2.1.3-i586-6vl58 gaim-2.0.0beta4-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 2.0.0beta5-i586-2vl58 xine-ui-0.99.4-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 0.99.4-i586-5vl58 xine-lib-1.0.2-i586-4vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.1.2-i586-4vl58 xfce-4.3.99.1-i586-2vl58 is to be upgraded to version 4.3.99.2-i586-3vl58 xfprint-4.3.99.1-i586-2vl58 is to be upgraded to version 4.3.99.3svn-i586-2vl58 MPlayer-1.0pre7try2-autoarch-2vl58 is to be upgraded to version 1.0pre8-autoarch-4vl58 Done slapt-get --dist-upgrade will be doable once the issues listed above are addressed. Cheers, John |
|
From: Jose J. R. <jo...@gm...> - 2006-12-20 11:15:10
|
On 12/18/06, John <joh...@gm...> wrote: > I was going to upgrade my VL 5.8 RC 2 to final using slapt-get --dist-upgrade. > To see what would happen if I did so, I entered the following version of the > slapt-get command (yes, I did have the latest slapt-getrc): > > VL58STDRC2://home/john > root:# slapt-get -s --dist-upgrade > > That version of the command simulates what would happen. There are four areas > of concern below. I will intersperse my comments with the output from > slapt-get --dist-upgrade: > > Reading Package Lists... Done > Excluding vl-hot, use --ignore-dep to override > Excluding vcpufreq, use --ignore-dep to override > Excluding goffice, use --ignore-dep to override > Excluding abiword, use --ignore-dep to override > Excluding frozen-bubble, use --ignore-dep to override > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > vl-hot: Depends: gambas-runtime_full >= 1.0.15 | gambas >= 1.0.15 > vcpufreq: Depends: gambas >= 1.0.15 I've been working on fixing the gambas deps issues. Gambas packages had a dep for openldap, which has now changed to openldap-client. I just uploaded fixed gambas packages to the repo and will be putting them in the proper places soon. Gambas is on extra/, but gambas-runtime should be on packages/, as it's the normal way for non gambas developers to run the apps. Regarding gambas-runtime though, there is an issue with the package name. Up to now I had been calling it gambas-runtime_full, in reference to the integrated nature of the package, against the separate components - packaging recommended by the developers. For some reason, the latest runtime package went on the iso with the wrong name. Now, should I just switch the package name on the repo to gambas-runtime from now on? Or keep the _full and add gambas-runtime to slack-conflicts? > The following NEW packages will be installed: > ntfs-3g ntfsprogs sharutils sshfs-fuse vlconfig2 Why is ntfs-3g "NEW"? IIRC, it was in RC2. Should show as upgrade. Regards, Joe1962 |
|
From: Jose J. R. <jo...@gm...> - 2006-12-20 21:03:50
|
On 12/20/06, Jose J. Rodriguez <jo...@gm...> wrote: > On 12/18/06, John <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > I was going to upgrade my VL 5.8 RC 2 to final using slapt-get --dist-upgrade. > > To see what would happen if I did so, I entered the following version of the > > slapt-get command (yes, I did have the latest slapt-getrc): > > > > VL58STDRC2://home/john > > root:# slapt-get -s --dist-upgrade > > > > That version of the command simulates what would happen. There are four areas > > of concern below. I will intersperse my comments with the output from > > slapt-get --dist-upgrade: > > > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Excluding vl-hot, use --ignore-dep to override > > Excluding vcpufreq, use --ignore-dep to override > > Excluding goffice, use --ignore-dep to override > > Excluding abiword, use --ignore-dep to override > > Excluding frozen-bubble, use --ignore-dep to override > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > vl-hot: Depends: gambas-runtime_full >= 1.0.15 | gambas >= 1.0.15 > > vcpufreq: Depends: gambas >= 1.0.15 > > I've been working on fixing the gambas deps issues. Gambas packages > had a dep for openldap, which has now changed to openldap-client. I > just uploaded fixed gambas packages to the repo and will be putting > them in the proper places soon. Gambas is on extra/, but > gambas-runtime should be on packages/, as it's the normal way for non > gambas developers to run the apps. Regarding gambas-runtime though, > there is an issue with the package name. Up to now I had been calling > it gambas-runtime_full, in reference to the integrated nature of the > package, against the separate components - packaging recommended by > the developers. For some reason, the latest runtime package went on > the iso with the wrong name. Now, should I just switch the package > name on the repo to gambas-runtime from now on? Or keep the _full and > add gambas-runtime to slack-conflicts? > Decided to keep gambas-runtime, less problematic as it is that way on the iso. Figured there won't be non-unified Gambas packages for VL any time soon. Uploaded repackages with fixed deps (I hope) of the following: vl-hot vcpufreq gambas I'm still unsure how to handle the gambas-runtime / gambas issue. That is, when gambas is installed, it will overwrite the gambas-runtime files, but both packages will still show up as installed. Also, if gambas is then uninstalled, gambas-runtime would then be broken, right? So gambas apps won't run. I remember asking before, but still, any ideas? > > > The following NEW packages will be installed: > > ntfs-3g ntfsprogs sharutils sshfs-fuse vlconfig2 > > Why is ntfs-3g "NEW"? IIRC, it was in RC2. Should show as upgrade. > > Regards, > Joe1962 > |
|
From: uel a. <ue...@gm...> - 2006-12-21 01:23:24
|
> > Decided to keep gambas-runtime, less problematic as it is that way on > the iso. Figured there won't be non-unified Gambas packages for VL any > time soon. Uploaded repackages with fixed deps (I hope) of the > following: > > vl-hot > vcpufreq > gambas > > I'm still unsure how to handle the gambas-runtime / gambas issue. That > is, when gambas is installed, it will overwrite the gambas-runtime > files, but both packages will still show up as installed. Also, if > gambas is then uninstalled, gambas-runtime would then be broken, > right? So gambas apps won't run. I remember asking before, but still, > any ideas? removepkg is supposed to check for this and not remove a file that exists in a package that is not being removed. but as always the only way you can be certain is to give it a try. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X