From: Newt <gen...@gm...> - 2009-10-07 19:51:24
|
Hello All, I often times wonder about screen resolution sizes and why: 1) we don't have more resolution sizes to choose from, and 2) why they aren't in "order" using the the first resolution size. I think it would be a nice feature to have many more resolution sizes to choose from, especially some unusual sizes that are common on widescreen displays. If it's not possible to implement this for the installer then no worries, but I think it would worth while for post-install configuration. I always have to choose the lower 1400x900 resolution and then adjust after-the-fact to my 1680x1050. Taking a quick look at wikipedia for 'display resolution' and 'comparison of netbooks' I think a comprehensive listing of resolution sizes would be: 640×480 800×480 800×600 1024×576 1024×600 1024×768 1152×864 1280×768 1280×800 1280×960 1280×1024 1366×768 1440×900 1600×768 1600×1200 1680×1050 1920×1080 1920×1200 This list certainly isn't exhaustive but perhaps a good start. Obviously, I don't know what kind of effort is required to edit the vxconf(?) resolution selection stage but if it's not too hard then it might be a useful change. Cheers! newt -- Best regards, Newt mailto:gen...@gm... |