From: Jose J. R. <jo...@gm...> - 2007-08-10 22:34:08
|
On 8/10/07, Eug=E9ne Suter <ea...@gm...> wrote: > That would be indeed a time saver...however, maybe the installer code sho= uld > be as much "pure" gambas as possible. I support the pure Gambas ideal as far as possible. > But I don't want to trample on your idea either! > Maybe vliloconf can be used initially until the installer can actually > install something, at which point more attention can be dedicated to gett= ing > everything "Gambas'ized" ;) This is pretty much what I was going to reply to M0E's post, but you got ahead of me. Let's use what we have for a first "draft", then work from there. Regards, Joe1962 |