Hi All!
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:05:55PM -0800, Abhijit Paithankar wrote:
> I guess so.
> how do we divide the work?
[...]
>
> I think instead of giving 2 options, we could have just a VB2C interpreter.
[...]
Yacc/Lex?
>
> there are some tasks on the task-list that can be clubbed together like:
>
> CHM Reader/Viewer and CHM Compiler
Don't know anything about CHM ... :(
> Syntax colorer and GUI i.e. GUI and the editor
> VB2C interpreter and Syntax checker
>
Today i've getting started with glade, with gtk+ basics...
Yeah! I think it's too difficult to make some kind of GUI with this...
> other tasks like runtime debugger need to be thought of coz' of
> interpreting, the debugger shall need to reverse-interpret the C code to VB
>
Mmmm... I'm thinking...
Just making a shell, it isn't?
A VBshell, that interpretes the vbcommand, directly.
The compilations are made by vb2c, but the debug, for me, it so slowly with a reverse-interpreter C->VB
...my english... :(*
> there are some doubts too:
>
> at design-time, we can emulate the Win32 API. should we make use of Wine
> here?
Wine, recreates all the win32 api? If yes, i think that we can use it...
> that shall take care of OCX stuff.
>
> Also, we can appoint Task-Managers who will be responsible for a particular
> (or a group of) task and then they can think about the way to implement
> their own module.
>
> do we need a website admin?
>
> once we have these things clear, we can start off.
>
Yes... :))))
I've reinstalled my linuxbox, (crash of course... :)))) )
I'm ready.. :)
--
Massimiliano Masi from www.mascanc.org
The Old BBs...
|
