Re: [VB4Linux-Dev] hey

[Luke-Jr <Mi...@an...>]

Umm... For debugging, I'd think it'd be much easier just to interpret the
VB directly... That way the "Immidiate" window will function correctly...

Abhijit Paithankar wrote:

> I guess so.
> how do we divide the work?
>
> I think instead of giving 2 options, we could have just a VB2C interpreter.
>
> there are some tasks on the task-list that can be clubbed together like:
>
> CHM Reader/Viewer and CHM Compiler
> Syntax colorer and GUI i.e. GUI and the editor
> VB2C interpreter and Syntax checker
>
> other tasks like runtime debugger need to be thought of coz' of
> interpreting, the debugger shall need to reverse-interpret the C code to VB
>
> there are some doubts too:
>
> at design-time, we can emulate the Win32 API. should we make use of Wine
> here?
> that shall take care of OCX stuff.
>
> Also, we can appoint Task-Managers who will be responsible for a particular
> (or a group of) task and then they can think about the way to implement
> their own module.
>
> do we need a website admin?
>
> once we have these things clear, we can start off.
>
> ab
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vb4...@li...
> [mailto:vb4...@li...]On Behalf Of Luke-Jr
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 4:52 AM
> To: vb4...@li...
> Subject: Re: [VB4Linux-Dev] hey
>
> Dunno... I guess we should start working on the project? Do we have all
> the plans ready?
>
> Abhijit Paithankar wrote:
>
> > whatever happened?
> > why is everyone so silent?
> > _______________________________________________
> > VB4Linux-Dev mailing list
> > VB4...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/vb4linux-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> VB4Linux-Dev mailing list
> VB4...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/vb4linux-dev