Re: [VB4Linux-Dev] hey
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
luke-jr
From: <mas...@so...> - 2000-11-17 13:50:28
|
Hi All! On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:05:55PM -0800, Abhijit Paithankar wrote: > I guess so. > how do we divide the work? [...] > > I think instead of giving 2 options, we could have just a VB2C interpreter. [...] Yacc/Lex? > > there are some tasks on the task-list that can be clubbed together like: > > CHM Reader/Viewer and CHM Compiler Don't know anything about CHM ... :( > Syntax colorer and GUI i.e. GUI and the editor > VB2C interpreter and Syntax checker > Today i've getting started with glade, with gtk+ basics... Yeah! I think it's too difficult to make some kind of GUI with this... > other tasks like runtime debugger need to be thought of coz' of > interpreting, the debugger shall need to reverse-interpret the C code to VB > Mmmm... I'm thinking... Just making a shell, it isn't? A VBshell, that interpretes the vbcommand, directly. The compilations are made by vb2c, but the debug, for me, it so slowly with a reverse-interpreter C->VB ...my english... :(* > there are some doubts too: > > at design-time, we can emulate the Win32 API. should we make use of Wine > here? Wine, recreates all the win32 api? If yes, i think that we can use it... > that shall take care of OCX stuff. > > Also, we can appoint Task-Managers who will be responsible for a particular > (or a group of) task and then they can think about the way to implement > their own module. > > do we need a website admin? > > once we have these things clear, we can start off. > Yes... :)))) I've reinstalled my linuxbox, (crash of course... :)))) ) I'm ready.. :) -- Massimiliano Masi from www.mascanc.org The Old BBs... |