|
From: Declan C. <dc...@ze...> - 2006-02-16 14:29:24
|
Hello, Hopefully this will be a quick one. Is there any way of getting valgrind/memcheck to output the process name for each error; in addition or instead of the pid? The pid isn't much use to me since the processes have gone by the time I process the output, so I can't work back from the pid:-( If this isn't currently possible it would be a very useful additional feature. Declan |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-02-16 14:40:47
|
Doesn't -v add enough info for you to figure out the process name? J On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:29, Declan Conlon wrote: > Hello, > > Hopefully this will be a quick one. > > Is there any way of getting valgrind/memcheck to output the process > name for each error; in addition or instead of the pid? The pid isn't > much use to me since the processes have gone by the time I process the > output, so I can't work back from the pid:-( If this isn't currently > possible it would be a very useful additional feature. > > Declan > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users |
|
From: Declan C. <dc...@ze...> - 2006-02-16 15:09:32
|
For me -v conflicts with my --quiet. I'm trying to integrate valgrind into our autotest system so I'm not interested in lots of output, just the errors. Intuitively it sounds like an easy feature to add since valgrind already knows the command line :-) In the meantime I'll have to stick to the guesswork I have at the minute. Thanks for the prompt replies, Declan On 2/16/06, Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote: > > Doesn't -v add enough info for you to figure out the process name? > > J > > On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:29, Declan Conlon wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Hopefully this will be a quick one. > > > > Is there any way of getting valgrind/memcheck to output the process > > name for each error; in addition or instead of the pid? The pid isn't > > much use to me since the processes have gone by the time I process the > > output, so I can't work back from the pid:-( If this isn't currently > > possible it would be a very useful additional feature. > > > > Declan > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > > files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that ma= kes > > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=12164= 2 > > _______________________________________________ > > Valgrind-users mailing list > > Val...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users > > |