|
From: Sefer T. <se...@ho...> - 2003-08-17 16:21:07
|
Hi!
I have recently tried an old program of mine using valgrind (latest cvs
version) and encountered an error stating it's missing an implementation
syscall no. 7 on my Mandrake 9.1 (glibc 2.3.2) box.
I looked through the header files and it seems to be coming from a missing
implementation of "waitpid" (called via __libc_waitpid).
I'd appreciate it if anyone could offer a patch to fix that and integrate it
into the head branch.
Thanks,
Sefer.
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
|
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2003-08-17 18:25:41
Attachments:
valgrind-waitpid-patch
|
In message <BAY...@ho...>
"Sefer Tov" <se...@ho...> wrote:
> I have recently tried an old program of mine using valgrind (latest cvs
> version) and encountered an error stating it's missing an implementation
> syscall no. 7 on my Mandrake 9.1 (glibc 2.3.2) box.
> I looked through the header files and it seems to be coming from a missing
> implementation of "waitpid" (called via __libc_waitpid).
That's odd - if I compile a program using waitpid I find that it
actually calls the wait4 system call. I guess you must have compiled
it against an old version of glibc or something.
> I'd appreciate it if anyone could offer a patch to fix that and integrate
> it into the head branch.
The attached patch should handle it...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/
|
|
From: Benjamin L. <ben...@us...> - 2003-08-18 10:02:13
Attachments:
syscall7.diff
|
Do you mean something like the file attached? (I could be completely wrong, by the way -- I just ripped off __NR_wait4). ;-) On Monday, 2003-08-18 at 02:21:01 AM, Sefer Tov scribbled: > Hi! > > I have recently tried an old program of mine using valgrind (latest cvs > version) and encountered an error stating it's missing an implementation > syscall no. 7 on my Mandrake 9.1 (glibc 2.3.2) box. > I looked through the header files and it seems to be coming from a missing > implementation of "waitpid" (called via __libc_waitpid). > > I'd appreciate it if anyone could offer a patch to fix that and integrate > it into the head branch. > > Thanks, > Sefer. -- Benjamin Lee Melbourne, Australia "Always real." http://www.realthought.net/ __________________________________________________________________________ Only those who leisurely approach that which the masses are busy about can be busy about that which the masses take leisurely. -- Lao Tsu |