You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(58) |
Apr
(261) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(214) |
Jul
(201) |
Aug
(219) |
Sep
(198) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(241) |
Dec
(94) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(149) |
Mar
(150) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(173) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(236) |
Sep
(157) |
Oct
(150) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(90) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(139) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(274) |
Apr
(138) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(152) |
Jul
(261) |
Aug
(409) |
Sep
(239) |
Oct
(241) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(137) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(191) |
Feb
(142) |
Mar
(169) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(141) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(192) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(142) |
Dec
(95) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(95) |
Nov
(106) |
Dec
(87) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(149) |
Mar
(175) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(106) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(97) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(115) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(103) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(105) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(110) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(99) |
May
(91) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(114) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(131) |
Dec
(62) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(52) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(42) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(18) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(26) |
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
(5) |
7
(3) |
8
|
|
9
(3) |
10
(1) |
11
(2) |
12
(3) |
13
(9) |
14
(2) |
15
|
|
16
|
17
(4) |
18
(5) |
19
(1) |
20
|
21
(4) |
22
(1) |
|
23
(1) |
24
(1) |
25
(3) |
26
(2) |
27
|
28
(2) |
29
|
|
30
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Bryan W. <br...@vi...> - 2007-09-28 19:55:20
|
Hi folks,
I've tried several different binary distributions of valgrind under
CentOS 5, and now I've grabbed the latest valgrind source code and
compiled it myself. In all cases, I see the following behavior:
If I start up valgrind like:
valgrind --db-attach=yes myprog
and then type "y" to invoke gdb when prompted, gdb begins to
run but hangs before it ever gets to the (gdb) prompt. No
input is accepted (even CTRL-C and CTRL-Z). Looking at the
processes running at this stage, I see something like:
pid1 \_ valgrind --db-attach=yes myprog
pid2 \_ valgrind --db-attach=yes myprog
pid3 \_ /usr/bin/gdb -nw /proc/5882/fd/1014 5882
If I send pid2 a signal with "kill pid2", I then get a gdb
prompt.
The valgrind version is 3.2.3 and this is gdb version
gdb-6.5-16.el5, from CentOS 5. Invoking gdb by itself (outside
of valgrind) works fine.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bryan
|
|
From: <Jed...@ia...> - 2007-09-28 17:05:36
|
Hello everyone, I'm new to Valgrind, so I apologize in advance if this is a stupid question, or if it has been asked/answered previously (I did search and have found nothing). Here is what I'm seeing: I have a program that utilizes a shared object. When I call a function exported by this shared object, my program runs without error. However, when I run the program through valgrind (e.g. valgrind --tool=memcheck --trace-children <program>), it reports an "Invalid read of size 2", then indicates that the program received signall 11 (SIGSEGV). First of all, I'm a little concerned, as this does not happen when the program is executed outside of the context of valgrind.. However, my real question is this: the line of code that is reported as the location of the invalid read can only cause a segmentation fault if the variable has not been declared (the function accesses a class member). It just happens to be the case that this class is instantiated in the shared object's library initialization code. So, I could find it conceivable that this version of Valgrind may mask the library's startup code, making the seg fault valid. To make matters more "interesting", this problem does not occur with any version of Valgrind after version 2.2.0. (I have not been able to test any version prior to 2.2.0...) So, I'm wondering if this is a "bug" that was resolved in later releases of Valgrind? I've searched through the release notes for the latest versions and have not found anything. Can anyone offer any insight? Thanks for any assistance you can offer! Jed Thomet |