You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(58) |
Apr
(261) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(214) |
Jul
(201) |
Aug
(219) |
Sep
(198) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(241) |
Dec
(94) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(149) |
Mar
(150) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(173) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(236) |
Sep
(157) |
Oct
(150) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(90) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(139) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(274) |
Apr
(138) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(152) |
Jul
(261) |
Aug
(409) |
Sep
(239) |
Oct
(241) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(137) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(191) |
Feb
(142) |
Mar
(169) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(141) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(192) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(142) |
Dec
(95) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(95) |
Nov
(106) |
Dec
(87) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(149) |
Mar
(175) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(106) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(97) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(115) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(103) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(105) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(110) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(99) |
May
(91) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(114) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(131) |
Dec
(62) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(52) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(42) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(18) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(26) |
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(21) |
2
(16) |
3
(3) |
4
(8) |
5
(9) |
6
(9) |
|
7
(14) |
8
(16) |
9
(21) |
10
(39) |
11
(29) |
12
(23) |
13
(9) |
|
14
(5) |
15
(8) |
16
(17) |
17
(30) |
18
(8) |
19
(35) |
20
(2) |
|
21
|
22
(2) |
23
(8) |
24
(15) |
25
(6) |
26
(20) |
27
(4) |
|
28
(1) |
29
(4) |
30
(8) |
31
(19) |
|
|
|
|
From: Christian P. <tr...@ge...> - 2005-08-17 07:19:30
|
Hi, just to be sure i'm not mistaken (and this is because of my borked app): I ran into the following unhandled instruction bytes: vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xCD 0x5 0x48 0x89 Regards, Christian Parpart. p.s.: VG 3.0 trunk (2days old) =2D-=20 09:17:25 up 146 days, 22:25, 2 users, load average: 1.58, 2.52, 2.81 |
|
From: prashantha a.s <pra...@ya...> - 2005-08-17 07:02:38
|
Hi, I tried with this, but again i am getting same problem. Please find the atachment. I am giving you entire detalis of memory and also the error that i am getting. Could you please help me regarding this Regards Prahantha.AS --- Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: > In message > <942...@ha...> > "Yeshurun, Meir" <mei...@in...> > wrote: > > > In line 272 of coregrind/stage1.c > > > > info.exe_base = VG_ROUNDDN(info.exe_end - > 0x02000000, 0x10000000); > > > > change the '2' to '4' (i.e., multiply 0x02000000 > by 2) > > > > and then make, make install again > > That will only work if it is a PIE build. He is > using 2.4.0 though > so it may well be as that was the default then. > > If it isn't a PIE build then KICKSTART_BASE will > been to be lowered. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes (to...@co...) > http://www.compton.nu/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software > Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * > Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects > & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Yeshurun, M. <mei...@in...> - 2005-08-17 05:39:37
|
Sorry, this message was delayed for some reason -----Original Message----- From: val...@li... [mailto:val...@li...] On Behalf Of Yeshurun, Meir Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:17 AM To: Rob Holland Cc: val...@li... Subject: RE: [Valgrind-users] Problem with needs_malloc_replacement Hi, Please run with --trace-redir=3Dyes and show us the output Regards, Meir -----Original Message----- From: val...@li... [mailto:val...@li...] On Behalf Of Rob Holland Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:28 PM To: valgrind-users Subject: [Valgrind-users] Problem with needs_malloc_replacement Hi, I've uploaded a valgrind tool which I created out of bits of various existing tools. The code can be found here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tigger/fc_main.c It's basically a 300 line no-op at the moment as it doesn't print anything. It's intended to keep track of what's on the heap. However, needs_malloc_replacement isn't having the effect which I expected. Namely, my replacements aren't being run. I can add a VG_(exit)(1); into the malloc routine and nothing changes. I'm a bit lost as to why it's not being used. Anyone have any idea? Thanks, Rob ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Val...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Val...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users |
|
From: Yeshurun, M. <mei...@in...> - 2005-08-17 05:17:20
|
Hi, Please run with --trace-redir=3Dyes and show us the output Regards, Meir -----Original Message----- From: val...@li... [mailto:val...@li...] On Behalf Of Rob Holland Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:28 PM To: valgrind-users Subject: [Valgrind-users] Problem with needs_malloc_replacement Hi, I've uploaded a valgrind tool which I created out of bits of various existing tools. The code can be found here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tigger/fc_main.c It's basically a 300 line no-op at the moment as it doesn't print anything. It's intended to keep track of what's on the heap. However, needs_malloc_replacement isn't having the effect which I expected. Namely, my replacements aren't being run. I can add a VG_(exit)(1); into the malloc routine and nothing changes. I'm a bit lost as to why it's not being used. Anyone have any idea? Thanks, Rob ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Val...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users |
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-08-17 02:53:28
|
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Neil Youngman wrote: > The problem seems to be that valgrind-3.0.0/VEX/Makefile has CC=gcc, > although it was set to gcc-3.4.4 in the configuration. Changing it in > this Makefile allows valgrind to build. > > This seems to be a deficiency in the configuration script. Yes. Vex has a hand-written Makefile, it does not use the automake/autoconf stuff that the rest of Valgrind does. The two options I can see are: - import CC from the configure script in the way that causes the minimum disturbance (I don't know how to do that, though) - fully automake/autoconf-ify Vex. The latter is made trickier by Vex being an SVN external module. Tom, do you know what would be a good way to fix this problem? N |