|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2021-10-09 09:20:42
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.18.0.GIT-3c53eea626-20211008
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-170-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2021-10-09 00:00:01 PDT
Ended at 2021-10-09 02:20:31 PDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 630 tests, 20 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo1 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.20s no: 3.6s (17.8x, -----) me: 7.9s (39.3x, -----) ca:35.0s (175.2x, -----) he: 4.2s (20.8x, -----) ca: 9.4s (47.1x, -----) dr: 4.2s (20.8x, -----) ma: 4.3s (21.5x, -----)
bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.20s no: 3.6s (17.8x, 0.3%) me: 7.9s (39.3x, 0.0%) ca:35.1s (175.5x, -0.2%) he: 4.1s (20.7x, 0.5%) ca: 9.4s (47.1x, 0.0%) dr: 4.1s (20.7x, 0.5%) ma: 4.3s (21.6x, -0.5%)
-- bigcode2 --
bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.20s no: 9.2s (45.8x, -----) me:18.5s (92.4x, -----) ca:61.3s (306.6x, -----) he:10.8s (53.8x, -----) ca:16.7s (83.3x, -----) dr:10.4s (52.0x, -----) ma:10.6s (52.8x, -----)
bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.20s no: 9.2s (45.9x, -0.1%) me:18.6s (92.8x, -0.4%) ca:61.4s (306.8x, -0.1%) he:10.7s (53.6x, 0.4%) ca:16.6s (82.8x, 0.5%) dr:10.4s (51.9x, 0.1%) ma:10.6s (52.9x, -0.2%)
-- bz2 --
bz2 valgrind-new:1.12s no: 4.0s ( 3.5x, -----) me:13.8s (12.3x, -----) ca:39.9s (35.6x, -----) he:19.5s (17.4x, -----) ca:30.3s (27.1x, -----) dr:29.0s (25.9x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -----)
bz2 valgrind-old:1.12s no: 3.9s ( 3.5x, 2.3%) me:13.8s (12.3x, 0.1%) ca:39.9s (35.6x, 0.0%) he:19.5s (17.4x, -0.2%) ca:30.3s (27.1x, 0.1%) dr:28.9s (25.8x, 0.0%) ma: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -0.2%)
-- fbench --
fbench valgrind-new:0.54s no: 4.4s ( 8.2x, -----) me: 8.1s (15.1x, -----) ca:17.2s (31.8x, -----) he: 7.0s (12.9x, -----) ca:10.4s (19.3x, -----) dr: 8.1s (14.9x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 7.8x, -----)
fbench valgrind-old:0.54s no: 4.4s ( 8.1x, 0.5%) me: 8.1s (15.1x, 0.1%) ca:17.2s (31.8x, -0.2%) he: 7.0s (12.9x, -0.1%) ca:10.4s (19.3x, 0.1%) dr: 8.0s (14.9x, 0.2%) ma: 4.2s ( 7.8x, -0.7%)
-- ffbench --
ffbench valgrind-new:0.52s no: 2.9s ( 5.6x, -----) me: 5.7s (10.9x, -----) ca: 6.0s (11.4x, -----) he:14.0s (27.0x, -----) ca:11.1s (21.3x, -----) dr: 9.9s (19.0x, -----) ma: 3.1s ( 6.0x, -----)
ffbench valgrind-old:0.52s no: 2.9s ( 5.6x, 0.0%) me: 5.7s (10.9x, 0.0%) ca: 6.0s (11.4x, 0.0%) he:13.9s (26.8x, 0.6%) ca:10.8s (20.7x, 2.7%) dr: 9.9s (19.0x, 0.1%) ma: 3.1s ( 6.0x, -0.3%)
-- heap --
heap valgrind-new:0.53s no: 2.6s ( 4.9x, -----) me:11.0s (20.8x, -----) ca:22.5s (42.5x, -----) he:16.2s (30.5x, -----) ca:12.9s (24.3x, -----) dr:10.2s (19.2x, -----) ma: 5.9s (11.1x, -----)
heap valgrind-old:0.53s no: 2.6s ( 4.9x, 0.4%) me:11.1s (20.9x, -0.3%) ca:22.5s (42.4x, 0.3%) he:16.1s (30.5x, 0.2%) ca:12.9s (24.3x, -0.2%) dr:10.2s (19.3x, -0.6%) ma: 5.9s (11.2x, -0.2%)
-- heap_pdb4 --
heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.56s no: 2.7s ( 4.8x, -----) me:17.7s (31.6x, -----) ca:24.7s (44.2x, -----) he:18.3s (32.8x, -----) ca:14.8s (26.4x, -----) dr:11.4s (20.4x, -----) ma: 6.1s (10.9x, -----)
heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.56s no: 2.7s ( 4.8x, 1.1%) me:17.6s (31.5x, 0.3%) ca:24.6s (43.9x, 0.5%) he:18.3s (32.8x, 0.0%) ca:14.8s (26.4x, 0.0%) dr:11.4s (20.4x, -0.3%) ma: 6.1s (10.9x, -0.2%)
-- many-loss-records --
many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.06s no: 0.6s (10.5x, -----) me: 3.1s (52.3x, -----) ca: 3.3s (55.7x, -----) he: 2.6s (42.8x, -----) ca: 2.4s (39.5x, -----) dr: 2.4s (39.5x, -----) ma: 1.7s (27.8x, -----)
many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.06s no: 0.6s (10.2x, 3.2%) me: 3.1s (52.5x, -0.3%) ca: 3.4s (55.8x, -0.3%) he: 2.5s (42.3x, 1.2%) ca: 2.4s (39.7x, -0.4%) dr: 2.4s (39.8x, -0.8%) ma: 1.7s (28.3x, -1.8%)
-- many-xpts --
many-xpts valgrind-new:0.12s no: 0.9s ( 7.3x, -----) me: 3.5s (28.8x, -----) ca: 8.1s (67.7x, -----) he: 4.4s (36.7x, -----) ca: 3.5s (29.6x, -----) dr: 3.4s (28.3x, -----) ma: 3.5s (29.2x, -----)
many-xpts valgrind-old:0.12s no: 0.9s ( 7.3x, 0.0%) me: 3.5s (29.0x, -0.6%) ca: 8.2s (68.0x, -0.5%) he: 4.4s (36.9x, -0.7%) ca: 3.5s (29.4x, 0.6%) dr: 3.4s (28.6x, -0.9%) ma: 3.5s (28.9x, 1.1%)
-- memrw --
memrw valgrind-new:0.29s no: 1.1s ( 3.8x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 9.1x, -----) ca: 8.6s (29.8x, -----) he:13.6s (47.0x, -----) ca: 4.2s (14.3x, -----) dr: 3.1s (10.7x, -----) ma: 1.4s ( 4.8x, -----)
memrw valgrind-old:0.29s no: 1.0s ( 3.6x, 5.5%) me: 2.7s ( 9.2x, -1.1%) ca: 8.7s (29.9x, -0.3%) he:13.6s (47.0x, 0.1%) ca: 4.1s (14.0x, 2.4%) dr: 3.1s (10.7x, -0.6%) ma: 1.4s ( 4.8x, 0.7%)
-- sarp --
sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.3x, -----) me: 3.9s (128.3x, -----) ca: 4.6s (152.7x, -----) he:10.7s (358.0x, -----) ca: 2.3s (75.7x, -----) dr: 1.9s (62.3x, -----) ma: 0.8s (25.7x, -----)
sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.3x, 0.0%) me: 3.8s (127.3x, 0.8%) ca: 4.6s (153.0x, -0.2%) he:10.8s (359.7x, -0.5%) ca: 2.3s (76.3x, -0.9%) dr: 1.9s (64.0x, -2.7%) ma: 0.8s (25.7x, 0.0%)
-- tinycc --
tinycc valgrind-new:0.38s no: 4.7s (12.4x, -----) me:22.1s (58.2x, -----) ca:45.9s (120.8x, -----) he:21.3s (56.1x, -----) ca:36.0s (94.9x, -----) dr:19.8s (52.2x, -----) ma: 6.0s (15.8x, -----)
tinycc valgrind-old:0.38s no: 4.7s (12.4x, -0.2%) me:22.1s (58.3x, -0.2%) ca:46.0s (121.1x, -0.2%) he:21.4s (56.3x, -0.2%) ca:36.1s (94.9x, -0.0%) dr:19.8s (52.1x, 0.1%) ma: 6.0s (15.9x, -0.5%)
-- Finished tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
== 12 programs, 168 timings =================
5394.67user 39.13system 1:30:38elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 532152maxresident)k
0inputs+481352outputs (0major+14741992minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/std_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- std_mutex.stderr.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ std_mutex.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:03.075600471 -0700
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
-Done.
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_rethrow (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_emplace_back_aux<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:426)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:101)
+ by 0x........: main (std_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:29.773025522 -0700
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:29.773025522 -0700
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:29.773025522 -0700
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2021-10-09 00:25:12.386264940 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -1,59 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -1,51 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: ???
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -1,54 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2021-10-09 00:25:12.376265905 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:46:35.042517737 -0700
@@ -1,59 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.266276520 -0700
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2021-10-09 00:31:17.651020642 -0700
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.266276520 -0700
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2021-10-09 00:31:21.080689788 -0700
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:37:34.484667229 -0700
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_init: 'count' argument is zero
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:44)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_barrier_init failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:44)
initialise a barrier twice
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_init: barrier is already initialised
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:49)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:50)
initialise a barrier which has threads waiting on it
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_init: barrier is already initialised
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:64)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:65)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_init: threads are waiting at barrier
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:64)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:65)
destroy a barrier that has waiting threads
@@ -45,14 +45,14 @@
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_destroy: threads are waiting at barrier
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:82)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:83)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_barrier_destroy failed
with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:82)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:83)
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
@@ -60,5 +60,5 @@
Thread #x: pthread_barrier_destroy: barrier was never initialised
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:98)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:100)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff-destroy-hang
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp-destroy-hang 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:37:34.484667229 -0700
@@ -47,20 +47,12 @@
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:83)
----Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:77)
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x: pthread_barrier_wait: barrier is uninitialised
- at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sleep1 (bar_bad.c:23)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+Thread #x's call to pthread_barrier_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:83)
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp-freebsd 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:37:34.484667229 -0700
@@ -56,3 +56,9 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: pthread_barrier_destroy: barrier was never initialised
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:100)
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:38:05.011722187 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2021-10-09 00:25:12.516252395 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2021-10-09 00:25:12.516252395 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2021-10-09 00:25:12.526251430 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2021-10-09 00:39:24.524051328 -0700
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
-----------------...
[truncated message content] |