|
From: <ma...@bu...> - 2021-10-08 00:34:20
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.18.0.GIT-a456fcef6d-20211007
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20210728 (Red Hat 11.2.1-1)
GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 10.2-3.fc34
Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.35.2-5.fc34
C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) release release version 2.33.
uname -mrs: Linux 5.13.16-200.fc34.s390x s390x
Vendor version: Fedora 34 (Thirty Four)
Nightly build on lfedora1 ( Fedora release 34 (Thirty Four), s390x )
Started at 2021-10-08 00:00:01 UTC
Ended at 2021-10-08 00:25:38 UTC
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 772 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
dhat/tests/copy (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 772 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
dhat/tests/copy (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1411: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 772 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
dhat/tests/copy (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 772 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
dhat/tests/copy (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1411: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2021-10-08 00:13:17.463570730 +0000
--- new.short 2021-10-08 00:25:38.403723757 +0000
***************
*** 14,17 ****
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
- drd/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
--- 14,17 ----
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
+ drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
***************
*** 33,36 ****
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
- drd/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
--- 33,36 ----
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
+ drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/dhat/tests/copy.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- copy.stderr.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.323570730 +0000
+++ copy.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:52.673723757 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Total: 1,000,... bytes in 1,0.. blocks
+Total: 900,181 bytes in 912 blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2021-10-08 00:13:18.473570730 +0000
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:19.453723757 +0000
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2021-10-08 00:13:18.473570730 +0000
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:19.453723757 +0000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2021-10-08 00:13:18.473570730 +0000
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:19.453723757 +0000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /home/mjw/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -1,59 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -1,51 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -1,54 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2021-10-08 00:13:18.483570730 +0000
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2021-10-08 00:23:22.343723757 +0000
@@ -1,59 +1,51 @@
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
+ by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:12)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:28)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeWS.stderrB.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.563570730 +0000
+++ mcinvokeWS.stderrB.out 2021-10-08 00:16:01.193600730 +0000
@@ -1,14 +1,4 @@
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
-sending command v.kill to pid ....
-readchar: Got EOF
-error reading packet
+syscall failed: No such process
+invoke_gdbserver_in_valgrind: check for pid 896336 existence failed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeWS.stdoutB.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.563570730 +0000
+++ mcinvokeWS.stdoutB.out 2021-10-08 00:16:01.173600730 +0000
@@ -2,22 +2,3 @@
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-monitor command request to kill this process
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- nlcontrolc.stdoutB.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.573570730 +0000
+++ nlcontrolc.stdoutB.out 2021-10-08 00:16:16.053610729 +0000
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
reset to sleeping parameters
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
-0x........ in syscall ...
-* 1 Thread .... (tid 1 VgTs_WaitSys) 0x........ in syscall ...
- > > > >4
+sleeper_or_burner (v=0x........) at sleepers.c:82
+82 if (sleepms > 0 && s->sleep) {
+* 1 Thread .... (tid 1 VgTs_Runnable) sleeper_or_burner (v=0x........)
+ > > > >3
Kill the program being debugged? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:47.423723757 +0000
@@ -6,54 +6,62 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ #
+ | ::#::
+ | ::::#: :
+ | ::: ::#: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 165.5
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 12
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.29)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:74)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:121)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp-freebsd 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:47.423723757 +0000
@@ -43,11 +43,12 @@
5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/local/lib/gcc10/libstdc++.so.6.0.28)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-|
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.29)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:74)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:121)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
+|
->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff-x86-freebsd-gcc
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp-x86-freebsd-gcc 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:47.423723757 +0000
@@ -6,28 +6,28 @@
KB
-30.26^ ####
- | #
- | :::#
- | ::: # :::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | :::::: : # : ::
- | : : : # : : ::
- | ::::: : : # : : : ::::::::::::::::::::::
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
- | : : : : # : : : :
+82.76^ #
+ | ::#::
+ | ::::#: :
+ | ::: ::#: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 60.52
+ 0 165.5
Number of snapshots: 12
Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
@@ -36,31 +36,32 @@
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 18,952 18,952 18,944 8 0
- 2 22,960 22,960 22,944 16 0
- 3 26,968 26,968 26,944 24 0
- 4 28,976 28,976 28,944 32 0
- 5 30,984 30,984 30,944 40 0
- 6 30,984 30,984 30,944 40 0
-99.87% (30,944B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->61.14% (18,944B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/local/lib/gcc9/libstdc++.so.6.0.28)
-| ->61.14% (18,944B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->61.14% (18,944B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->61.14% (18,944B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-|
-->12.91% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.29)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:74)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:121)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
-->12.91% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
|
-->06.45% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
|
-->06.45% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 7 34,992 26,976 26,944 32 0
- 8 39,000 22,968 22,944 24 0
- 9 41,008 20,960 20,944 16 0
- 10 43,016 18,952 18,944 8 0
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:48.423723757 +0000
@@ -6,54 +6,62 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ #
+ | ::#::
+ | ::::#: :
+ | ::: ::#: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 165.5
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 12
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.29)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:74)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:121)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp-freebsd 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:48.423723757 +0000
@@ -43,11 +43,12 @@
5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/local/lib/gcc10/libstdc++.so.6.0.28)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /libexec/ld-elf.so.1)
-|
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.29)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:74)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:121)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
+|
->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
|
->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp-mips32 2021-10-08 00:13:18.753570730 +0000
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2021-10-08 00:23:48.423723757 +0000
@@ -1,63 +1,67 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Command: ./overloaded-new
-Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element
+Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element --ignore-fn=_GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc --ignore-fn=call_init.part.0
ms_print arguments: massif.out
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ #
+ | ::#::
+ | ::::#: :
+ | ::: ::#: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ | : : ::#: :::
+ ...
[truncated message content] |