You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(124) |
Apr
(346) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(256) |
Jul
(238) |
Aug
(384) |
Sep
(304) |
Oct
(186) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(144) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 |
Jan
(165) |
Feb
(177) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(220) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(167) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(174) |
Dec
(121) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(168) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(177) |
May
(236) |
Jun
(173) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(102) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(109) |
Nov
(120) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(122) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(125) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(123) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(115) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(96) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(83) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(172) |
Feb
(127) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(56) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(109) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(80) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(90) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(88) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(62) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(180) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(158) |
Apr
(216) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(86) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(8) |
2
|
3
(8) |
4
(9) |
5
(8) |
6
|
7
(9) |
|
8
(1) |
9
(9) |
10
(9) |
11
(9) |
12
(9) |
13
(7) |
14
|
|
15
(8) |
16
(9) |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
(10) |
23
(8) |
24
(8) |
25
(8) |
26
(8) |
27
(1) |
28
(9) |
|
29
(8) |
30
(8) |
31
(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-05 03:43:09
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-05 03:33:28
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-05 03:24:24
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-05 03:14:58
|
|
From: <ma...@bu...> - 2023-01-05 01:34:21
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-394ca9b400-20230104
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20220819 (Red Hat 12.2.1-2)
GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 12.1-2.fc36
Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.37-36.fc36
C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.35.
uname -mrs: Linux 6.0.5-200.fc36.s390x s390x
Vendor version: Fedora Linux 36 (Thirty Six)
Nightly build on lfedora1 ( Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six), s390x )
Started at 2023-01-05 00:00:01 UTC
Ended at 2023-01-05 01:15:13 UTC
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
syslog: valgrind -q ./syslog
system: valgrind ./system
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2023-01-05 00:39:22.879157877 +0000
--- new.short 2023-01-05 01:15:13.306493861 +0000
***************
*** 8,13 ****
! == 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
- gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
- gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
--- 8,11 ----
! == 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
***************
*** 17,18 ****
--- 15,18 ----
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
+ syslog: valgrind -q ./syslog
+ system: valgrind ./system
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
***************
*** 27,32 ****
! == 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
- gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
- gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
--- 27,30 ----
! == 792 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-05 00:39:25.589157877 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-05 01:08:12.686737523 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-05 00:39:25.989157877 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-05 00:49:29.598902218 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-05 00:39:27.219157877 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-05 01:02:46.556784660 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-05 00:00:31.730193181 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-05 00:29:36.709352428 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-05 00:00:31.730193181 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-05 00:09:16.949886157 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeRU.stderrB.exp 2023-01-05 00:00:31.730193181 +0000
+++ mcinvokeRU.stderrB.out 2023-01-05 00:09:57.679886157 +0000
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
+readchar: Got EOF
+no ack mode: unexpected buflen -2
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-05 00:00:31.730193181 +0000
+++ mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.out 2023-01-05 00:09:57.259886157 +0000
@@ -18,6 +18,4 @@
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
monitor command request to kill this process
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-05 00:00:31.780193181 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-05 00:21:13.089559408 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
|
|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2023-01-04 10:32:42
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-74e2000746-20230103
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-170-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2023-01-04 00:00:01 PST
Ended at 2023-01-04 02:32:25 PST
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 648 tests, 20 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.21s no: 3.6s (17.1x, -----) me: 7.9s (37.6x, -----) ca:36.2s (172.2x, -----) he: 4.2s (20.0x, -----) ca: 9.5s (45.2x, -----) dr: 4.2s (19.9x, -----) ma: 4.4s (20.8x, -----)
bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.21s no: 3.6s (17.0x, 0.8%) me: 7.9s (37.6x, 0.0%) ca:36.2s (172.5x, -0.2%) he: 4.2s (20.0x, -0.2%) ca:10.2s (48.8x, -7.9%) dr: 4.2s (19.8x, 0.5%) ma: 4.4s (20.9x, -0.5%)
-- bigcode2 --
bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.21s no: 9.1s (43.5x, -----) me:22.4s (106.7x, -----) ca:66.5s (316.7x, -----) he:13.0s (61.8x, -----) ca:19.6s (93.3x, -----) dr:10.5s (49.9x, -----) ma:10.6s (50.6x, -----)
bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.21s no:10.9s (52.1x,-19.9%) me:18.6s (88.7x, 16.8%) ca:66.4s (316.4x, 0.1%) he:10.9s (52.0x, 15.8%) ca:16.7s (79.7x, 14.5%) dr:12.5s (59.7x,-19.7%) ma:10.6s (50.6x, 0.0%)
-- bz2 --
bz2 valgrind-new:1.12s no: 3.9s ( 3.5x, -----) me:14.7s (13.1x, -----) ca:40.2s (35.9x, -----) he:20.2s (18.0x, -----) ca:30.9s (27.6x, -----) dr:29.7s (26.5x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 3.8x, -----)
bz2 valgrind-old:1.12s no: 4.1s ( 3.6x, -5.4%) me:14.6s (13.0x, 0.6%) ca:40.3s (36.0x, -0.1%) he:20.2s (18.0x, -0.0%) ca:30.9s (27.6x, -0.2%) dr:29.6s (26.4x, 0.6%) ma: 4.2s ( 3.8x, 0.2%)
-- fbench --
fbench valgrind-new:0.54s no: 4.1s ( 7.5x, -----) me: 8.8s (16.3x, -----) ca:16.7s (30.9x, -----) he: 6.8s (12.5x, -----) ca:10.2s (18.9x, -----) dr: 8.8s (16.4x, -----) ma: 4.1s ( 7.6x, -----)
fbench valgrind-old:0.54s no: 4.1s ( 7.6x, -0.2%) me: 8.8s (16.4x, -0.1%) ca:16.7s (30.9x, -0.1%) he: 6.8s (12.6x, -0.1%) ca:10.2s (18.9x, -0.5%) dr: 8.7s (16.1x, 1.7%) ma: 4.2s ( 7.8x, -1.9%)
-- ffbench --
ffbench valgrind-new:0.53s no: 3.0s ( 5.6x, -----) me: 5.8s (11.0x, -----) ca: 5.9s (11.2x, -----) he:16.7s (31.6x, -----) ca:11.1s (21.0x, -----) dr:10.0s (18.8x, -----) ma: 3.2s ( 6.0x, -----)
ffbench valgrind-old:0.53s no: 3.0s ( 5.6x, 0.3%) me: 5.7s (10.8x, 1.5%) ca: 5.9s (11.2x, 0.0%) he:17.0s (32.0x, -1.5%) ca:11.2s (21.1x, -0.4%) dr:10.0s (18.9x, -0.4%) ma: 3.1s ( 5.9x, 1.9%)
-- heap --
heap valgrind-new:0.55s no: 2.5s ( 4.6x, -----) me:11.5s (21.0x, -----) ca:23.1s (42.1x, -----) he:16.6s (30.2x, -----) ca:13.6s (24.7x, -----) dr:10.5s (19.0x, -----) ma: 6.0s (10.9x, -----)
heap valgrind-old:0.55s no: 2.6s ( 4.7x, -1.6%) me:11.2s (20.3x, 3.2%) ca:23.2s (42.1x, -0.1%) he:16.6s (30.2x, 0.2%) ca:13.4s (24.4x, 1.1%) dr:10.1s (18.4x, 3.3%) ma: 6.0s (10.9x, 0.0%)
-- heap_pdb4 --
heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.57s no: 2.8s ( 4.9x, -----) me:18.1s (31.7x, -----) ca:24.4s (42.7x, -----) he:19.6s (34.4x, -----) ca:15.1s (26.4x, -----) dr:11.9s (20.8x, -----) ma: 6.1s (10.7x, -----)
heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.57s no: 2.8s ( 4.9x, -1.4%) me:18.5s (32.4x, -2.1%) ca:25.3s (44.3x, -3.7%) he:18.8s (33.0x, 3.8%) ca:14.9s (26.2x, 0.7%) dr:11.6s (20.4x, 2.4%) ma: 6.2s (10.9x, -2.0%)
-- many-loss-records --
many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.4x, -----) me: 3.3s (47.0x, -----) ca: 3.4s (48.3x, -----) he: 2.9s (41.3x, -----) ca: 2.4s (34.0x, -----) dr: 2.4s (34.7x, -----) ma: 1.7s (24.7x, -----)
many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.6x, -1.5%) me: 3.2s (46.3x, 1.5%) ca: 3.4s (48.3x, 0.0%) he: 2.7s (38.4x, 6.9%) ca: 2.4s (34.9x, -2.5%) dr: 2.4s (34.7x, 0.0%) ma: 1.7s (23.7x, 4.0%)
-- many-xpts --
many-xpts valgrind-new:0.11s no: 0.9s ( 8.2x, -----) me: 3.5s (31.6x, -----) ca: 8.3s (75.2x, -----) he: 4.4s (40.4x, -----) ca: 3.5s (32.0x, -----) dr: 3.5s (32.0x, -----) ma: 3.5s (32.2x, -----)
many-xpts valgrind-old:0.11s no: 0.9s ( 8.0x, 2.2%) me: 3.5s (31.5x, 0.3%) ca: 8.2s (75.0x, 0.2%) he: 4.5s (40.7x, -0.9%) ca: 3.5s (31.9x, 0.3%) dr: 3.5s (32.3x, -0.9%) ma: 3.5s (32.2x, 0.0%)
-- memrw --
memrw valgrind-new:0.28s no: 1.1s ( 3.9x, -----) me: 2.7s ( 9.5x, -----) ca: 8.6s (30.7x, -----) he:15.4s (55.1x, -----) ca: 4.2s (14.8x, -----) dr: 3.1s (11.1x, -----) ma: 1.4s ( 5.1x, -----)
memrw valgrind-old:0.28s no: 1.1s ( 3.9x, 0.0%) me: 2.6s ( 9.5x, 0.4%) ca: 8.6s (30.7x, 0.0%) he:15.4s (55.1x, 0.0%) ca: 4.2s (15.0x, -1.0%) dr: 3.1s (11.2x, -1.0%) ma: 1.5s ( 5.2x, -2.8%)
-- sarp --
sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.6s (19.7x, -----) me: 3.8s (125.3x, -----) ca: 4.7s (156.3x, -----) he:10.8s (358.3x, -----) ca: 2.3s (76.0x, -----) dr: 1.9s (64.3x, -----) ma: 0.8s (26.3x, -----)
sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.5s (18.0x, 8.5%) me: 3.8s (127.3x, -1.6%) ca: 4.7s (157.7x, -0.9%) he:10.6s (354.3x, 1.1%) ca: 2.3s (78.0x, -2.6%) dr: 2.0s (66.3x, -3.1%) ma: 0.8s (26.7x, -1.3%)
-- tinycc --
tinycc valgrind-new:0.40s no: 4.8s (11.9x, -----) me:22.4s (56.1x, -----) ca:46.8s (117.0x, -----) he:22.3s (55.7x, -----) ca:36.9s (92.3x, -----) dr:21.5s (53.8x, -----) ma: 6.1s (15.2x, -----)
tinycc valgrind-old:0.40s no: 4.7s (11.8x, 0.4%) me:22.6s (56.5x, -0.8%) ca:46.7s (116.6x, 0.3%) he:26.6s (66.5x,-19.3%) ca:36.7s (91.8x, 0.5%) dr:22.5s (56.2x, -4.6%) ma: 6.1s (15.2x, 0.0%)
-- Finished tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
== 12 programs, 168 timings =================
5748.60user 48.76system 1:36:44elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 532184maxresident)k
0inputs+480960outputs (0major+14760090minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.836624583 -0800
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:49:21.244037444 -0800
@@ -4,12 +4,44 @@
thread created
sleeping
signalling
-sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: clone (in /...libc...)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+sleeping
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/std_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- std_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ std_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:22.992402250 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
-Done.
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_rethrow (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_emplace_back_aux<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:426)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:101)
+ by 0x........: main (std_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-04 00:27:58.816626495 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:52.379593855 -0800
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:52.379593855 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:52.379593855 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2023-01-04 00:27:58.846623627 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2023-01-04 00:27:58.836624583 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-04 00:27:58.836624583 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-04 00:27:58.816626495 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
@@ -15,19 +16,21 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:5)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
@@ -37,18 +40,12 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:51:58.019054921 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/timed_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timed_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.826625539 -0800
+++ timed_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:52:52.703829032 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_throw (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::_M_start_thread(std::shared_ptr<std::thread::_Impl_base>) (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::thread<void (&)()>(void (&)()) (thread:...)
+ by 0x........: main (timed_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.666640836 -0800
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 00:35:00.776284098 -0800
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.666640836 -0800
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2023-01-04 00:35:04.395938064 -0800
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:59.016607374 -0800
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:42:27.113618381 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (hg05_race2.c:23)
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (hg05_race2.c:23)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.996609286 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2023-01-04 00:27:58.996609286 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2023-01-04 00:27:59.016607374 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2023-01-04 00:27:59.016607374 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2023-01-04 00:27:59.006608330 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2023-01-04 00:27:59.016607374 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-04 00:27:59.006608330 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:56.535071359 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_trylock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:131)
@@ -74,7 +82,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_timedlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:136)
@@ -89,7 +97,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:140)
@@ -142,7 +150,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:180)
@@ -158,22 +166,13 @@
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside rwl.__pthread_rwlock_readers,
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_rwlock_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
-
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.736634143 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:36:51.735676731 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-04 00:27:58.776630319 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:36:51.735676731 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/sigaltstack.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- sigaltstack.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.796628407 -0800
+++ sigaltstack.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:39:24.891036309 -0800
@@ -4,3 +4,51 @@
raising the signal
caught signal, local var is on 0x........
done
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 4
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.716636056 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:39:38.959691501 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2023-01-04 00:27:58.716636056 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:39:38.959691501 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.736634143 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:40:30.264787360 -0800
@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp-ppc64 2023-01-04 00:27:58.776630319 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:40:30.264787360 -0800
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo3.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:27:58.716636056 -0800
+++ varinfo3.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:40:34.994335278 -0800
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:43)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_def[6],
- declared at varinfo3.c:51, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo3.c:28)
@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:45)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_undef[8],
- declared at varinfo3.c:53, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
=======================================...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: <pj...@wa...> - 2023-01-04 07:02:52
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-74e2000746-20230103 C compiler: FreeBSD clang version 13.0.0 (gi...@gi...:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-13.0.0-0-gd7b669b3a303) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) 12.1 [GDB v12.1 for FreeBSD] C library: FreeBSD libc uname -mrs: FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64 Vendor version: FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p5 Nightly build on freebsd ( FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64 ) Started at 2023-01-04 07:28:14 CET Ended at 2023-01-04 08:02:39 CET Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 775 tests, 2 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stdout) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB) helgrind/tests/tls_threads (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo 445032: valgrind -q ./445032 -- Finished tests in none/tests/x86-freebsd ---------------------------- -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- -- Running tests in exp-bbv/tests/x86 --------------------------------- complex_rep: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=complex_rep.out.bb ./complex_rep fldcw_check: valgrind --interval-size=10000 --bb-out-file=fldcw_check.out.bb ./fldcw_check million: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=million.out.bb --pc-out-file=million.out.pc ./million rep_prefix: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=rep_prefix.out.bb ./rep_prefix -- Finished tests in exp-bbv/tests/x86 --------------------------------- == 775 tests, 2 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stdout) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB) helgrind/tests/tls_threads (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives gmake: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderr.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 07:45:47.295740000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stderr.out 2023-01-04 07:50:55.142428000 +0100 @@ -4,4 +4,8 @@ For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) -Reset valgrind output to log (orderly_finish) +HEAP SUMMARY: + in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks +For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full +For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s +ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 07:45:47.295799000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 07:50:55.249689000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 -monitor command request to kill this process -Remote connection closed +Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint. +"monitor" command not supported by this target. ================================================= ./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stdout.diff ================================================= --- /dev/null 2023-01-04 07:50:55.098927000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stdout.out 2023-01-04 07:50:55.084521000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +mem is zero ================================================= ./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-04 07:45:47.295921000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.out 2023-01-04 07:50:55.206459000 +0100 @@ -4,9 +4,5 @@ Continuing. Breakpoint 1, main () at clean_after_fork.c:9 9 pid = fork(); -Hardware read watchpoint 4: mem Continuing. -Hardware read watchpoint 4: mem -Value = 0 -main () at clean_after_fork.c:34 -34 if (mem == 0) +Program exited normally. ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tls_threads.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tls_threads.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 07:45:47.325455000 +0100 +++ tls_threads.stderr.out 2023-01-04 07:56:15.767315000 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,126 @@ +--5722:0: sched WARNING: pthread stack cache cannot be disabled! +---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------ + +Thread #x was created + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: level1 (tls_threads.c:69) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------ + +Thread #x was created + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: main (tls_threads.c:88) + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: level1 (tls_threads.c:69) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: global_false_positive (tls_threads.c:33) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:49) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: global_false_positive (tls_threads.c:33) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:49) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + starting join in main +---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------ + +Thread #x was created <truncated beyond 100 lines> ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderr.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 07:28:51.589230000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stderr.out 2023-01-04 07:34:07.761083000 +0100 @@ -4,4 +4,8 @@ For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) -Reset valgrind output to log (orderly_finish) +HEAP SUMMARY: + in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks +For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full +For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s +ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 07:28:51.589292000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 07:34:07.866863000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 -monitor command request to kill this process -Remote connection closed +Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint. +"monitor" command not supported by this target. ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stdout.diff ================================================= --- /dev/null 2023-01-04 07:34:07.718594000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stdout.out 2023-01-04 07:34:07.704289000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +mem is zero ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-04 07:28:51.589411000 +0100 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stdoutB.out 2023-01-04 07:34:07.822555000 +0100 @@ -4,9 +4,5 @@ Continuing. Breakpoint 1, main () at clean_after_fork.c:9 9 pid = fork(); -Hardware read watchpoint 4: mem Continuing. -Hardware read watchpoint 4: mem -Value = 0 -main () at clean_after_fork.c:34 -34 if (mem == 0) +Program exited normally. ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tls_threads.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tls_threads.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 07:28:51.627860000 +0100 +++ tls_threads.stderr.out 2023-01-04 07:39:29.006805000 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,95 @@ +--39095:0: sched WARNING: pthread stack cache cannot be disabled! starting join in main +---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------ + +Thread #x was created + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: level1 (tls_threads.c:69) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------ + +Thread #x was created + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: main (tls_threads.c:88) + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: level1 (tls_threads.c:69) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: local_false_positive (tls_threads.c:28) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:48) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during read of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: global_false_positive (tls_threads.c:33) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:49) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + +---------------------------------------------------------------- + +Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x +Locks held: none + at 0x........: global_false_positive (tls_threads.c:33) + by 0x........: level2 (tls_threads.c:49) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...) + ... + +This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x +Locks held: none + ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...) + Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment + finished join in main |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-04 05:51:52
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-74e2000746-20230103 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-1127.13.1.el7.ppc64le ppc64le Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc112 ( \S, ppc64le ) Started at 2023-01-04 03:00:03 UTC Ended at 2023-01-04 05:51:37 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 672 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo system: valgrind ./system thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- == 672 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.37s no: 6.1s (16.4x, -----) me: 9.0s (24.3x, -----) ca:29.7s (80.3x, -----) he: 7.0s (19.0x, -----) ca:16.6s (45.0x, -----) dr: 8.1s (21.9x, -----) ma: 7.7s (20.9x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.37s no: 6.3s (16.9x, -3.5%) me: 9.7s (26.2x, -7.7%) ca:27.3s (73.8x, 8.1%) he: 7.8s (21.1x,-11.0%) ca:14.6s (39.6x, 12.1%) dr: 6.8s (18.4x, 16.1%) ma: 6.3s (17.1x, 18.0%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.38s no:11.5s (30.2x, -----) me:25.0s (65.7x, -----) ca:53.9s (141.8x, -----) he:16.1s (42.4x, -----) ca:22.4s (58.9x, -----) dr:16.9s (44.6x, -----) ma:14.7s (38.7x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.38s no:13.8s (36.2x,-20.1%) me:21.3s (56.1x, 14.6%) ca:51.4s (135.2x, 4.7%) he:13.2s (34.6x, 18.3%) ca:26.8s (70.6x,-19.8%) dr:15.5s (40.8x, 8.3%) ma:14.8s (39.0x, -0.7%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:1.07s no: 8.7s ( 8.2x, -----) me:27.1s (25.3x, -----) ca:32.5s (30.3x, -----) he:21.6s (20.2x, -----) ca:33.4s (31.2x, -----) dr:26.6s (24.8x, -----) ma: 6.4s ( 6.0x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:1.07s no: 6.8s ( 6.4x, 22.1%) me:19.7s (18.4x, 27.2%) ca:35.7s (33.3x, -9.9%) he:22.9s (21.4x, -6.2%) ca:34.2s (32.0x, -2.5%) dr:26.8s (25.0x, -0.7%) ma: 6.7s ( 6.3x, -5.1%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.29s no: 3.0s (10.2x, -----) me: 7.7s (26.6x, -----) ca:13.5s (46.5x, -----) he: 8.3s (28.7x, -----) ca:11.3s (38.9x, -----) dr: 6.8s (23.6x, -----) ma: 3.1s (10.8x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.29s no: 3.3s (11.5x,-12.1%) me:10.9s (37.6x,-41.4%) ca:12.4s (42.8x, 7.9%) he: 7.8s (27.1x, 5.6%) ca:10.9s (37.5x, 3.6%) dr: 7.6s (26.1x,-10.7%) ma: 4.4s (15.2x,-40.8%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.41s no: 1.4s ( 3.3x, -----) me: 5.5s (13.5x, -----) ca: 4.4s (10.7x, -----) he:11.1s (27.1x, -----) ca:11.9s (29.1x, -----) dr: 8.2s (20.1x, -----) ma: 1.6s ( 3.9x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.41s no: 1.6s ( 3.8x,-14.8%) me: 4.0s ( 9.7x, 28.5%) ca: 2.7s ( 6.5x, 38.9%) he:11.6s (28.2x, -4.1%) ca:11.7s (28.5x, 2.3%) dr: 8.4s (20.4x, -1.3%) ma: 1.4s ( 3.3x, 14.5%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.53s no: 3.0s ( 5.7x, -----) me:12.0s (22.6x, -----) ca:18.1s (34.2x, -----) he:13.0s (24.5x, -----) ca:18.6s (35.0x, -----) dr: 9.8s (18.5x, -----) ma: 5.3s (10.1x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.53s no: 3.5s ( 6.6x,-15.8%) me:12.4s (23.4x, -3.4%) ca:16.8s (31.6x, 7.6%) he:13.5s (25.5x, -4.2%) ca:14.7s (27.8x, 20.5%) dr: 7.2s (13.6x, 26.5%) ma: 3.7s ( 7.0x, 30.5%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.42s no: 3.0s ( 7.2x, -----) me:13.6s (32.5x, -----) ca:15.2s (36.3x, -----) he:12.7s (30.3x, -----) ca:15.2s (36.2x, -----) dr: 8.0s (19.1x, -----) ma: 3.9s ( 9.2x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.42s no: 2.8s ( 6.8x, 5.6%) me:14.0s (33.3x, -2.6%) ca:16.4s (39.0x, -7.6%) he:12.4s (29.5x, 2.4%) ca:15.5s (37.0x, -2.1%) dr: 7.9s (18.8x, 1.4%) ma: 6.1s (14.5x,-57.7%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.9s (17.6x, -----) me: 3.6s (73.0x, -----) ca: 2.7s (54.6x, -----) he: 2.5s (50.8x, -----) ca: 3.0s (60.0x, -----) dr: 2.0s (40.8x, -----) ma: 1.2s (23.4x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.05s no: 0.9s (17.4x, 1.1%) me: 3.2s (65.0x, 11.0%) ca: 2.6s (52.4x, 4.0%) he: 2.7s (53.6x, -5.5%) ca: 3.2s (63.4x, -5.7%) dr: 1.8s (36.6x, 10.3%) ma: 1.2s (23.6x, -0.9%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.05s no: 1.3s (26.2x, -----) me: 4.3s (86.8x, -----) ca: 6.3s (126.2x, -----) he: 3.8s (75.4x, -----) ca: 4.4s (88.8x, -----) dr: 3.0s (60.2x, -----) ma: 2.5s (50.8x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.05s no: 1.0s (19.2x, 26.7%) me: 3.9s (78.4x, 9.7%) ca: 5.5s (109.2x, 13.5%) he: 4.3s (87.0x,-15.4%) ca: 4.5s (89.0x, -0.2%) dr: 3.5s (69.6x,-15.6%) ma: 2.6s (53.0x, -4.3%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.10s no: 1.9s (18.6x, -----) me: 4.8s (47.8x, -----) ca: 9.1s (91.3x, -----) he:11.8s (118.0x, -----) ca: 6.9s (69.3x, -----) dr: 3.3s (32.6x, -----) ma: 2.6s (26.4x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.10s no: 2.4s (23.6x,-26.9%) me: 4.4s (44.4x, 7.1%) ca: 6.9s (68.7x, 24.8%) he:10.3s (102.6x, 13.1%) ca: 6.8s (68.0x, 1.9%) dr: 4.0s (40.3x,-23.6%) ma: 2.7s (26.8x, -1.5%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.9s (17.6x, -----) me: 7.3s (145.8x, -----) ca: 4.7s (93.2x, -----) he:13.1s (262.6x, -----) ca: 4.1s (81.2x, -----) dr: 2.9s (57.4x, -----) ma: 1.1s (22.2x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.05s no: 1.0s (19.6x,-11.4%) me: 6.9s (137.4x, 5.8%) ca: 4.0s (80.8x, 13.3%) he:12.4s (247.4x, 5.8%) ca: 4.5s (89.0x, -9.6%) dr: 2.5s (50.4x, 12.2%) ma: 1.1s (22.0x, 0.9%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.49s no: 5.4s (11.1x, -----) me:26.2s (53.4x, -----) ca:23.6s (48.1x, -----) he:16.8s (34.2x, -----) ca:17.9s (36.4x, -----) dr:15.9s (32.4x, -----) ma: 4.1s ( 8.4x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.49s no: 3.5s ( 7.1x, 35.7%) me:18.4s (37.6x, 29.5%) ca:17.7s (36.1x, 24.9%) he:24.1s (49.3x,-44.1%) ca:26.1s (53.2x,-45.9%) dr:20.4s (41.5x,-28.2%) ma: 5.8s (11.8x,-40.4%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 99m7.120s user 94m9.449s sys 0m23.834s |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-04 04:46:00
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-74e2000746-20230103 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.ppc64 ppc64 Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc110 ( \S, ppc64 ) Started at 2023-01-04 03:00:02 UTC Ended at 2023-01-04 04:45:40 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 704 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- -- Running tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- ll: valgrind --interval-size=1000 --bb-out-file=ll.out.bb ./ll million: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=million.out.bb ./million -- Finished tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- == 704 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.23s no: 1.6s ( 6.7x, -----) me: 2.9s (12.4x, -----) ca:21.7s (94.2x, -----) he: 1.8s ( 7.7x, -----) ca: 5.4s (23.3x, -----) dr: 1.7s ( 7.6x, -----) ma: 2.2s ( 9.4x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.23s no: 1.5s ( 6.7x, 0.6%) me: 2.8s (12.3x, 0.7%) ca:21.5s (93.6x, 0.6%) he: 1.8s ( 7.7x, 0.0%) ca: 5.0s (21.9x, 6.2%) dr: 1.7s ( 7.4x, 1.7%) ma: 2.2s ( 9.5x, -0.9%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.24s no: 1.5s ( 6.2x, -----) me: 3.0s (12.4x, -----) ca:21.3s (88.8x, -----) he: 2.1s ( 8.8x, -----) ca: 5.5s (23.0x, -----) dr: 1.8s ( 7.6x, -----) ma: 2.5s (10.4x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.24s no: 1.5s ( 6.2x, 0.0%) me: 3.0s (12.4x, 0.0%) ca:21.4s (89.3x, -0.6%) he: 2.1s ( 8.9x, -0.5%) ca: 5.5s (23.1x, -0.2%) dr: 1.8s ( 7.5x, 1.1%) ma: 2.5s (10.5x, -0.4%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:0.74s no: 4.5s ( 6.1x, -----) me:12.9s (17.4x, -----) ca:30.0s (40.6x, -----) he:15.1s (20.4x, -----) ca:22.9s (31.0x, -----) dr:19.0s (25.7x, -----) ma: 4.5s ( 6.1x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:0.74s no: 4.5s ( 6.1x, -0.2%) me:12.9s (17.4x, -0.2%) ca:30.0s (40.5x, 0.1%) he:15.1s (20.4x, 0.0%) ca:22.9s (30.9x, 0.1%) dr:19.0s (25.7x, -0.1%) ma: 4.5s ( 6.1x, 0.0%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.9x, -----) me: 6.4s (18.4x, -----) ca: 9.4s (26.9x, -----) he: 5.4s (15.4x, -----) ca: 7.8s (22.4x, -----) dr: 5.3s (15.3x, -----) ma: 2.5s ( 7.2x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.8x, 0.8%) me: 6.4s (18.4x, 0.2%) ca: 9.4s (26.8x, 0.5%) he: 5.4s (15.4x, 0.0%) ca: 7.8s (22.4x, 0.1%) dr: 5.3s (15.3x, 0.0%) ma: 2.5s ( 7.1x, 0.8%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.44s no: 1.1s ( 2.5x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 5.8x, -----) ca: 2.9s ( 6.6x, -----) he: 9.2s (21.0x, -----) ca: 6.8s (15.5x, -----) dr: 5.5s (12.4x, -----) ma: 1.1s ( 2.4x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.44s no: 1.1s ( 2.5x, 1.8%) me: 2.6s ( 5.9x, -0.4%) ca: 2.9s ( 6.6x, 0.0%) he: 9.2s (21.0x, 0.1%) ca: 6.9s (15.6x, -0.4%) dr: 5.5s (12.4x, 0.2%) ma: 1.1s ( 2.4x, 0.0%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.36s no: 2.2s ( 6.1x, -----) me: 8.5s (23.7x, -----) ca:13.8s (38.4x, -----) he:11.0s (30.6x, -----) ca:11.5s (32.0x, -----) dr: 6.7s (18.7x, -----) ma: 4.0s (11.0x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.36s no: 2.2s ( 6.2x, -1.8%) me: 8.5s (23.7x, 0.0%) ca:13.8s (38.2x, 0.3%) he:11.1s (30.7x, -0.4%) ca:11.5s (32.0x, -0.1%) dr: 6.9s (19.1x, -1.9%) ma: 4.0s (11.1x, -0.8%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.38s no: 2.3s ( 6.1x, -----) me:12.4s (32.7x, -----) ca:15.0s (39.5x, -----) he:12.8s (33.6x, -----) ca:12.3s (32.4x, -----) dr: 7.8s (20.5x, -----) ma: 3.9s (10.3x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.38s no: 2.3s ( 6.1x, 0.4%) me:12.4s (32.7x, 0.0%) ca:15.0s (39.5x, 0.1%) he:12.8s (33.6x, -0.1%) ca:12.3s (32.4x, 0.1%) dr: 7.8s (20.4x, 0.5%) ma: 4.0s (10.5x, -1.8%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.04s no: 0.4s (11.0x, -----) me: 2.0s (50.5x, -----) ca: 1.9s (47.2x, -----) he: 1.7s (41.8x, -----) ca: 1.7s (43.2x, -----) dr: 1.4s (34.5x, -----) ma: 0.9s (23.8x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.04s no: 0.4s (11.0x, 0.0%) me: 2.0s (50.5x, 0.0%) ca: 1.9s (47.5x, -0.5%) he: 1.6s (41.2x, 1.2%) ca: 1.7s (43.5x, -0.6%) dr: 1.4s (35.0x, -1.4%) ma: 0.9s (23.2x, 2.1%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.6s (12.4x, -----) me: 3.3s (65.4x, -----) ca: 4.6s (92.4x, -----) he: 4.0s (79.4x, -----) ca: 2.7s (54.0x, -----) dr: 2.1s (42.0x, -----) ma: 2.3s (46.0x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.05s no: 0.7s (13.4x, -8.1%) me: 3.3s (65.8x, -0.6%) ca: 4.6s (92.0x, 0.4%) he: 4.0s (79.0x, 0.5%) ca: 2.7s (53.8x, 0.4%) dr: 2.1s (42.2x, -0.5%) ma: 2.3s (45.4x, 1.3%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.05s no: 1.0s (19.8x, -----) me: 1.9s (38.8x, -----) ca: 5.3s (106.6x, -----) he: 7.7s (154.6x, -----) ca: 3.3s (65.4x, -----) dr: 2.0s (40.6x, -----) ma: 1.1s (22.4x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.05s no: 1.0s (19.6x, 1.0%) me: 2.0s (39.8x, -2.6%) ca: 5.3s (107.0x, -0.4%) he: 7.9s (158.0x, -2.2%) ca: 3.3s (65.6x, -0.3%) dr: 2.0s (40.8x, -0.5%) ma: 1.1s (22.6x, -0.9%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.3x, -----) me: 3.9s (130.7x, -----) ca: 2.8s (94.7x, -----) he: 9.3s (310.7x, -----) ca: 1.7s (55.7x, -----) dr: 1.2s (39.3x, -----) ma: 0.4s (14.7x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.7x, -2.9%) me: 3.9s (130.0x, 0.5%) ca: 2.8s (94.7x, 0.0%) he: 9.4s (312.7x, -0.6%) ca: 1.7s (55.7x, 0.0%) dr: 1.1s (38.0x, 3.4%) ma: 0.5s (15.3x, -4.5%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.25s no: 3.1s (12.5x, -----) me:15.6s (62.4x, -----) ca:18.3s (73.1x, -----) he:18.6s (74.3x, -----) ca:15.4s (61.8x, -----) dr:12.8s (51.2x, -----) ma: 3.4s (13.8x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.25s no: 3.1s (12.6x, -0.6%) me:15.7s (62.6x, -0.3%) ca:18.2s (73.0x, 0.2%) he:18.6s (74.3x, 0.0%) ca:15.4s (61.7x, 0.1%) dr:12.8s (51.3x, -0.2%) ma: 3.4s (13.7x, 0.3%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 55m23.331s user 54m3.887s sys 0m15.026s |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-04 03:43:35
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-04 03:33:19
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-04 03:24:25
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-04 03:15:07
|
|
From: <ma...@bu...> - 2023-01-04 01:34:16
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-74e2000746-20230103
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20220819 (Red Hat 12.2.1-2)
GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 12.1-2.fc36
Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.37-36.fc36
C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.35.
uname -mrs: Linux 6.0.5-200.fc36.s390x s390x
Vendor version: Fedora Linux 36 (Thirty Six)
Nightly build on lfedora1 ( Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six), s390x )
Started at 2023-01-04 00:00:01 UTC
Ended at 2023-01-04 00:53:08 UTC
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
system: valgrind ./system
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2023-01-04 00:21:29.335557482 +0000
--- new.short 2023-01-04 00:53:08.815975238 +0000
***************
*** 8,11 ****
! == 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
--- 8,13 ----
! == 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
+ gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
+ gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
***************
*** 16,19 ****
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
- system: valgrind ./system
- thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
--- 18,19 ----
***************
*** 27,30 ****
! == 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
--- 27,32 ----
! == 792 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
+ gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB)
+ gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:32.045557482 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:43:51.285811382 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:32.505557482 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 00:27:31.795613008 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeRU.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:32.545557482 +0000
+++ mcinvokeRU.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 00:27:59.135613008 +0000
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
+readchar: Got EOF
+no ack mode: unexpected buflen -2
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
sending command v.wait 0 to pid ....
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:32.545557482 +0000
+++ mcinvokeRU.stdoutB.out 2023-01-04 00:27:59.055613008 +0000
@@ -18,6 +18,4 @@
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
-gdbserver: continuing in 0 ms ...
-gdbserver: continuing after wait ...
monitor command request to kill this process
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:33.985557482 +0000
+++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:31:34.295631453 +0000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
sleeping one second ...
timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
+ it_value = 0.0 it_interval = 0.1
sleeping 1 second ...
waiting timer ...
got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
+got timer ticks (1) after 0.6 s
sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
sleeping one second ...
timerfd_gettime returned:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:21:34.385557482 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:36:30.535699514 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:00:22.615373016 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:15:56.135429476 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-04 00:00:22.615373016 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-04 00:05:51.665373016 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:00:22.645373016 +0000
+++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:08:57.215373016 +0000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
sleeping one second ...
timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
+ it_value = 0.0 it_interval = 0.1
sleeping 1 second ...
waiting timer ...
got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-04 00:00:22.655373016 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-04 00:11:26.845373016 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
|
|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2023-01-03 10:33:10
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-56971834a7-20230102
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-170-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2023-01-03 00:00:01 PST
Ended at 2023-01-03 02:32:54 PST
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 647 tests, 20 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.20s no: 3.6s (17.9x, -----) me: 7.9s (39.5x, -----) ca:35.4s (176.9x, -----) he: 4.2s (20.9x, -----) ca: 9.5s (47.5x, -----) dr: 4.2s (20.8x, -----) ma: 4.9s (24.6x, -----)
bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.20s no: 3.6s (17.8x, 0.6%) me: 7.9s (39.6x, -0.3%) ca:35.4s (177.0x, -0.1%) he: 4.8s (23.8x,-14.1%) ca: 9.5s (47.4x, 0.3%) dr: 4.1s (20.7x, 0.5%) ma: 4.4s (21.8x, 11.4%)
-- bigcode2 --
bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.21s no: 9.1s (43.5x, -----) me:18.7s (89.0x, -----) ca:66.9s (318.7x, -----) he:10.8s (51.6x, -----) ca:16.7s (79.6x, -----) dr:10.5s (49.9x, -----) ma:10.6s (50.4x, -----)
bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.21s no: 9.2s (43.6x, -0.1%) me:21.4s (102.0x,-14.6%) ca:66.5s (316.7x, 0.6%) he:13.1s (62.3x,-20.7%) ca:16.8s (79.8x, -0.3%) dr:10.3s (49.2x, 1.2%) ma:10.8s (51.2x, -1.6%)
-- bz2 --
bz2 valgrind-new:1.14s no: 4.1s ( 3.6x, -----) me:14.2s (12.4x, -----) ca:40.3s (35.4x, -----) he:20.2s (17.7x, -----) ca:30.9s (27.1x, -----) dr:29.5s (25.9x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -----)
bz2 valgrind-old:1.14s no: 3.9s ( 3.4x, 4.2%) me:14.7s (12.9x, -4.0%) ca:40.3s (35.4x, 0.1%) he:20.1s (17.7x, 0.4%) ca:30.9s (27.1x, 0.0%) dr:29.4s (25.8x, 0.2%) ma: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -0.2%)
-- fbench --
fbench valgrind-new:0.54s no: 4.1s ( 7.5x, -----) me: 8.2s (15.1x, -----) ca:16.7s (30.9x, -----) he: 6.7s (12.5x, -----) ca:10.2s (18.9x, -----) dr: 8.5s (15.7x, -----) ma: 4.1s ( 7.6x, -----)
fbench valgrind-old:0.54s no: 4.1s ( 7.6x, -0.5%) me: 8.8s (16.4x, -8.1%) ca:16.6s (30.8x, 0.1%) he: 6.8s (12.5x, -0.4%) ca:10.2s (18.9x, 0.1%) dr: 8.5s (15.8x, -0.4%) ma: 4.1s ( 7.7x, -0.7%)
-- ffbench --
ffbench valgrind-new:0.53s no: 2.9s ( 5.5x, -----) me: 5.8s (10.9x, -----) ca: 5.9s (11.2x, -----) he:17.1s (32.2x, -----) ca:11.5s (21.7x, -----) dr: 9.9s (18.8x, -----) ma: 3.2s ( 6.1x, -----)
ffbench valgrind-old:0.53s no: 3.0s ( 5.6x, -1.0%) me: 5.7s (10.8x, 1.4%) ca: 6.0s (11.2x, -0.3%) he:16.7s (31.5x, 2.1%) ca:11.2s (21.1x, 2.9%) dr:10.0s (18.8x, -0.2%) ma: 3.2s ( 6.1x, 0.6%)
-- heap --
heap valgrind-new:0.54s no: 2.5s ( 4.7x, -----) me:11.3s (20.9x, -----) ca:23.7s (43.8x, -----) he:16.6s (30.8x, -----) ca:12.9s (23.8x, -----) dr:10.4s (19.3x, -----) ma: 6.0s (11.0x, -----)
heap valgrind-old:0.54s no: 2.5s ( 4.6x, 0.4%) me:11.5s (21.3x, -2.0%) ca:23.7s (43.9x, -0.3%) he:16.7s (30.9x, -0.2%) ca:12.9s (23.8x, -0.1%) dr:10.2s (18.9x, 2.1%) ma: 5.9s (11.0x, 0.5%)
-- heap_pdb4 --
heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.57s no: 2.9s ( 5.1x, -----) me:18.3s (32.0x, -----) ca:24.3s (42.7x, -----) he:18.7s (32.8x, -----) ca:15.0s (26.3x, -----) dr:11.6s (20.4x, -----) ma: 6.1s (10.7x, -----)
heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.57s no: 2.8s ( 5.0x, 2.1%) me:18.4s (32.4x, -1.0%) ca:25.2s (44.2x, -3.5%) he:19.6s (34.4x, -4.7%) ca:15.0s (26.4x, -0.1%) dr:11.6s (20.4x, -0.2%) ma: 6.1s (10.7x, 0.0%)
-- many-loss-records --
many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.07s no: 0.6s ( 9.1x, -----) me: 3.3s (46.6x, -----) ca: 3.7s (52.7x, -----) he: 2.7s (38.6x, -----) ca: 2.4s (34.0x, -----) dr: 2.4s (34.6x, -----) ma: 1.6s (23.6x, -----)
many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.4x, -3.1%) me: 3.4s (49.1x, -5.5%) ca: 3.4s (48.4x, 8.1%) he: 2.9s (41.1x, -6.7%) ca: 2.4s (34.3x, -0.8%) dr: 2.4s (34.4x, 0.4%) ma: 1.8s (25.3x, -7.3%)
-- many-xpts --
many-xpts valgrind-new:0.11s no: 0.9s ( 8.1x, -----) me: 3.7s (33.4x, -----) ca: 8.2s (74.9x, -----) he: 4.5s (40.8x, -----) ca: 3.8s (34.8x, -----) dr: 3.7s (33.8x, -----) ma: 3.7s (33.6x, -----)
many-xpts valgrind-old:0.11s no: 0.9s ( 7.9x, 2.2%) me: 3.6s (32.8x, 1.6%) ca: 9.1s (82.5x,-10.1%) he: 4.5s (41.0x, -0.4%) ca: 3.8s (34.4x, 1.3%) dr: 3.5s (32.3x, 4.6%) ma: 3.5s (32.2x, 4.3%)
-- memrw --
memrw valgrind-new:0.30s no: 1.1s ( 3.7x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 8.8x, -----) ca: 8.6s (28.7x, -----) he:15.5s (51.7x, -----) ca: 4.2s (13.8x, -----) dr: 3.1s (10.5x, -----) ma: 1.4s ( 4.8x, -----)
memrw valgrind-old:0.30s no: 1.1s ( 3.8x, -3.6%) me: 2.7s ( 8.9x, -0.8%) ca: 8.7s (28.9x, -0.6%) he:15.4s (51.5x, 0.4%) ca: 4.2s (13.8x, 0.0%) dr: 3.1s (10.4x, 1.0%) ma: 1.4s ( 4.8x, 0.0%)
-- sarp --
sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.3x, -----) me: 3.9s (129.3x, -----) ca: 4.7s (156.7x, -----) he:10.8s (361.3x, -----) ca: 2.3s (77.3x, -----) dr: 2.0s (65.7x, -----) ma: 0.8s (26.3x, -----)
sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.3x, 0.0%) me: 3.8s (127.0x, 1.8%) ca: 4.7s (156.7x, 0.0%) he:10.8s (360.7x, 0.2%) ca: 2.3s (77.3x, 0.0%) dr: 2.0s (65.3x, 0.5%) ma: 0.8s (26.0x, 1.3%)
-- tinycc --
tinycc valgrind-new:0.42s no: 6.9s (16.4x, -----) me:22.2s (52.9x, -----) ca:46.7s (111.2x, -----) he:21.9s (52.2x, -----) ca:37.0s (88.0x, -----) dr:20.0s (47.6x, -----) ma: 8.8s (21.0x, -----)
tinycc valgrind-old:0.42s no: 4.7s (11.3x, 31.0%) me:25.3s (60.2x,-13.8%) ca:46.8s (111.4x, -0.2%) he:26.8s (63.7x,-22.0%) ca:36.7s (87.4x, 0.6%) dr:25.7s (61.3x,-28.7%) ma: 6.1s (14.6x, 30.6%)
-- Finished tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
== 12 programs, 168 timings =================
5784.08user 50.22system 1:37:20elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 532180maxresident)k
0inputs+480872outputs (0major+14759873minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.575687408 -0800
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:49:15.183354647 -0800
@@ -4,12 +4,44 @@
thread created
sleeping
signalling
-sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: clone (in /...libc...)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+sleeping
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/std_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- std_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ std_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:16.401816786 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
-Done.
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_rethrow (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_emplace_back_aux<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:426)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:101)
+ by 0x........: main (std_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-03 00:27:49.555689315 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:44.969097507 -0800
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-03 00:27:49.555689315 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:44.969097507 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:44.969097507 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2023-01-03 00:27:49.585686455 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-03 00:27:49.555689315 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
@@ -15,19 +16,21 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:5)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
@@ -37,18 +40,12 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-03 00:27:49.565688362 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:51:50.588562590 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/timed_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timed_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.555689315 -0800
+++ timed_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:52:45.143363187 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_throw (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::_M_start_thread(std::shared_ptr<std::thread::_Impl_base>) (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::thread<void (&)()>(void (&)()) (thread:...)
+ by 0x........: main (timed_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.405703615 -0800
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-03 00:34:55.155176091 -0800
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.405703615 -0800
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2023-01-03 00:34:58.664842335 -0800
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.755670249 -0800
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:42:22.222651638 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.735672155 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2023-01-03 00:27:49.735672155 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2023-01-03 00:27:49.755670249 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2023-01-03 00:27:49.755670249 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2023-01-03 00:27:49.745671202 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2023-01-03 00:27:49.745671202 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-03 00:27:49.745671202 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:43:51.224183627 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_trylock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:131)
@@ -74,7 +82,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_timedlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:136)
@@ -89,7 +97,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:140)
@@ -142,7 +150,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:180)
@@ -158,22 +166,13 @@
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside rwl.__pthread_rwlock_readers,
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_rwlock_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
-
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.475696942 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:36:47.464495261 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-03 00:27:49.515693128 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:36:47.464495261 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/sigaltstack.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- sigaltstack.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.535691222 -0800
+++ sigaltstack.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:39:21.189873610 -0800
@@ -4,3 +4,51 @@
raising the signal
caught signal, local var is on 0x........
done
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 4
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.455698848 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:39:34.958563881 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2023-01-03 00:27:49.455698848 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:39:34.958563881 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.475696942 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:40:27.333581606 -0800
@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp-ppc64 2023-01-03 00:27:49.515693128 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:40:27.333581606 -0800
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo3.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:27:49.455698848 -0800
+++ varinfo3.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:40:32.083129783 -0800
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:43)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_def[6],
- declared at varinfo3.c:51, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo3.c:28)
@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:45)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_undef[8],
- declared at varinfo3.c:53, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff-freebsd
============================...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-03 05:50:04
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-56971834a7-20230102 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-1127.13.1.el7.ppc64le ppc64le Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc112 ( \S, ppc64le ) Started at 2023-01-03 03:00:02 UTC Ended at 2023-01-03 05:49:51 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 671 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo system: valgrind ./system thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- == 671 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.39s no: 7.0s (18.1x, -----) me:10.1s (25.9x, -----) ca:31.9s (81.7x, -----) he: 7.2s (18.3x, -----) ca:14.5s (37.2x, -----) dr: 7.3s (18.6x, -----) ma: 7.0s (18.1x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.39s no: 6.2s (15.8x, 12.2%) me: 9.7s (24.8x, 4.5%) ca:29.7s (76.1x, 6.9%) he: 6.5s (16.6x, 9.7%) ca:13.3s (34.2x, 8.1%) dr: 7.7s (19.8x, -6.3%) ma: 7.7s (19.8x, -9.7%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.36s no:12.5s (34.6x, -----) me:23.5s (65.3x, -----) ca:58.2s (161.7x, -----) he:17.1s (47.6x, -----) ca:24.8s (68.8x, -----) dr:15.1s (41.9x, -----) ma:12.4s (34.5x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.36s no:15.3s (42.5x,-22.7%) me:23.1s (64.1x, 1.8%) ca:46.9s (130.2x, 19.5%) he:13.8s (38.4x, 19.3%) ca:25.7s (71.5x, -3.8%) dr:15.4s (42.7x, -1.9%) ma:15.3s (42.5x,-23.1%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:1.17s no: 7.8s ( 6.6x, -----) me:23.7s (20.3x, -----) ca:36.3s (31.0x, -----) he:21.4s (18.3x, -----) ca:33.5s (28.7x, -----) dr:24.9s (21.3x, -----) ma: 6.8s ( 5.8x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:1.17s no: 6.9s ( 5.9x, 11.0%) me:20.1s (17.2x, 15.3%) ca:34.6s (29.6x, 4.7%) he:23.8s (20.3x,-11.0%) ca:33.1s (28.3x, 1.4%) dr:24.9s (21.3x, 0.1%) ma: 6.8s ( 5.8x, 0.0%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.51s no: 4.2s ( 8.3x, -----) me:11.4s (22.4x, -----) ca:10.5s (20.7x, -----) he: 5.9s (11.5x, -----) ca:11.8s (23.1x, -----) dr: 7.9s (15.5x, -----) ma: 3.5s ( 6.9x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.51s no: 4.1s ( 8.0x, 4.0%) me: 9.3s (18.2x, 18.7%) ca:11.0s (21.6x, -4.7%) he: 6.9s (13.5x,-17.4%) ca:11.6s (22.8x, 1.2%) dr: 7.4s (14.5x, 6.6%) ma: 4.3s ( 8.4x,-22.3%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.37s no: 1.5s ( 4.2x, -----) me: 5.0s (13.6x, -----) ca: 4.2s (11.4x, -----) he:10.4s (28.2x, -----) ca:10.9s (29.4x, -----) dr: 7.8s (21.0x, -----) ma: 1.7s ( 4.5x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.37s no: 1.4s ( 3.7x, 11.7%) me: 3.8s (10.3x, 24.4%) ca: 4.0s (10.8x, 4.8%) he:10.8s (29.1x, -3.1%) ca:11.9s (32.1x, -9.3%) dr: 9.6s (25.8x,-22.9%) ma: 1.4s ( 3.8x, 14.5%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.50s no: 4.1s ( 8.2x, -----) me:12.0s (24.1x, -----) ca:20.5s (41.1x, -----) he:14.4s (28.8x, -----) ca:15.6s (31.3x, -----) dr:10.5s (21.1x, -----) ma: 5.1s (10.2x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.50s no: 4.4s ( 8.7x, -6.3%) me:13.6s (27.2x,-13.2%) ca:15.4s (30.8x, 25.0%) he:11.6s (23.2x, 19.2%) ca:14.0s (28.1x, 10.3%) dr: 7.7s (15.4x, 27.0%) ma: 3.9s ( 7.7x, 24.5%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.32s no: 2.9s ( 9.1x, -----) me:13.9s (43.5x, -----) ca:16.1s (50.5x, -----) he:13.1s (40.8x, -----) ca:15.4s (48.2x, -----) dr: 8.1s (25.4x, -----) ma: 4.2s (13.2x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.32s no: 3.1s ( 9.6x, -5.1%) me:14.1s (43.9x, -1.0%) ca:15.8s (49.4x, 2.2%) he:13.6s (42.5x, -4.2%) ca:20.1s (62.9x,-30.4%) dr: 9.3s (29.2x,-14.9%) ma: 5.2s (16.2x,-23.3%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.04s no: 0.8s (20.5x, -----) me: 3.4s (84.5x, -----) ca: 2.3s (58.0x, -----) he: 2.3s (57.8x, -----) ca: 3.0s (73.8x, -----) dr: 1.8s (46.0x, -----) ma: 1.4s (34.5x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.04s no: 0.9s (21.8x, -6.1%) me: 3.5s (88.5x, -4.7%) ca: 2.7s (68.5x,-18.1%) he: 2.4s (60.5x, -4.8%) ca: 3.2s (79.8x, -8.1%) dr: 2.1s (53.5x,-16.3%) ma: 1.2s (29.0x, 15.9%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.08s no: 1.2s (14.7x, -----) me: 4.0s (49.6x, -----) ca: 5.5s (68.9x, -----) he: 3.4s (42.8x, -----) ca: 5.0s (62.1x, -----) dr: 3.3s (41.2x, -----) ma: 2.4s (30.0x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.08s no: 1.3s (16.2x,-10.2%) me: 4.7s (58.4x,-17.6%) ca: 6.8s (85.6x,-24.3%) he: 4.6s (57.9x,-35.4%) ca: 4.8s (59.4x, 4.4%) dr: 3.5s (43.6x, -5.8%) ma: 3.0s (36.9x,-22.9%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.10s no: 2.0s (19.7x, -----) me: 3.9s (39.3x, -----) ca: 8.1s (80.9x, -----) he:11.8s (118.3x, -----) ca: 6.3s (63.0x, -----) dr: 4.4s (43.7x, -----) ma: 2.6s (26.0x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.10s no: 2.3s (23.1x,-17.3%) me: 4.4s (44.2x,-12.5%) ca: 8.2s (81.6x, -0.9%) he:11.8s (118.4x, -0.1%) ca: 5.3s (52.9x, 16.0%) dr: 4.0s (40.4x, 7.6%) ma: 2.7s (26.6x, -2.3%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.8s (15.2x, -----) me: 6.7s (134.2x, -----) ca: 4.5s (91.0x, -----) he:12.1s (241.6x, -----) ca: 3.9s (78.2x, -----) dr: 2.6s (51.4x, -----) ma: 1.0s (20.4x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.05s no: 0.9s (17.4x,-14.5%) me: 7.4s (147.8x,-10.1%) ca: 4.2s (84.4x, 7.3%) he:13.4s (267.2x,-10.6%) ca: 4.4s (88.8x,-13.6%) dr: 2.7s (54.0x, -5.1%) ma: 1.0s (20.0x, 2.0%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.53s no: 5.6s (10.6x, -----) me:20.3s (38.3x, -----) ca:17.3s (32.6x, -----) he:16.3s (30.8x, -----) ca:17.6s (33.1x, -----) dr:15.8s (29.8x, -----) ma: 4.0s ( 7.6x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.53s no: 3.7s ( 7.0x, 34.0%) me:19.8s (37.4x, 2.5%) ca:18.7s (35.2x, -7.9%) he:24.5s (46.2x,-49.7%) ca:23.1s (43.7x,-31.9%) dr:18.2s (34.4x,-15.6%) ma: 6.0s (11.4x,-49.8%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 99m17.164s user 93m57.639s sys 0m24.798s |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-03 04:42:41
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-56971834a7-20230102 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.ppc64 ppc64 Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc110 ( \S, ppc64 ) Started at 2023-01-03 03:00:02 UTC Ended at 2023-01-03 04:42:26 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 703 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- -- Running tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- ll: valgrind --interval-size=1000 --bb-out-file=ll.out.bb ./ll million: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=million.out.bb ./million -- Finished tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- == 703 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.23s no: 1.6s ( 6.7x, -----) me: 2.9s (12.7x, -----) ca:21.7s (94.4x, -----) he: 1.8s ( 7.8x, -----) ca: 5.5s (24.1x, -----) dr: 1.8s ( 8.0x, -----) ma: 2.2s ( 9.5x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.23s no: 1.6s ( 7.0x, -3.9%) me: 3.0s (12.8x, -0.7%) ca:21.6s (94.0x, 0.5%) he: 1.8s ( 7.7x, 2.2%) ca: 5.4s (23.3x, 3.2%) dr: 1.7s ( 7.6x, 4.9%) ma: 2.2s ( 9.5x, 0.0%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.23s no: 1.5s ( 6.5x, -----) me: 3.0s (12.9x, -----) ca:21.3s (92.5x, -----) he: 2.1s ( 9.0x, -----) ca: 5.5s (23.9x, -----) dr: 1.8s ( 7.9x, -----) ma: 2.5s (10.8x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.23s no: 1.5s ( 6.5x, 0.7%) me: 3.0s (13.0x, -0.3%) ca:21.3s (92.7x, -0.3%) he: 2.1s ( 9.2x, -1.9%) ca: 5.5s (24.0x, -0.7%) dr: 1.8s ( 7.9x, 0.5%) ma: 2.5s (10.9x, -0.8%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:0.75s no: 4.5s ( 6.0x, -----) me:13.0s (17.3x, -----) ca:30.0s (40.0x, -----) he:15.1s (20.2x, -----) ca:22.9s (30.5x, -----) dr:19.0s (25.4x, -----) ma: 4.5s ( 6.1x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:0.75s no: 4.5s ( 6.0x, 0.0%) me:12.9s (17.2x, 0.4%) ca:30.1s (40.1x, -0.3%) he:15.1s (20.2x, 0.0%) ca:22.9s (30.5x, -0.0%) dr:19.0s (25.4x, 0.1%) ma: 4.5s ( 6.1x, 0.0%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.9x, -----) me: 6.4s (18.4x, -----) ca: 9.4s (26.8x, -----) he: 5.4s (15.5x, -----) ca: 7.9s (22.5x, -----) dr: 5.4s (15.3x, -----) ma: 2.5s ( 7.2x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.9x, 0.0%) me: 6.5s (18.4x, -0.3%) ca: 9.5s (27.0x, -1.0%) he: 5.4s (15.4x, 0.4%) ca: 7.9s (22.5x, 0.3%) dr: 5.3s (15.3x, 0.4%) ma: 2.5s ( 7.2x, 0.4%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.44s no: 1.1s ( 2.5x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 5.8x, -----) ca: 2.9s ( 6.6x, -----) he: 9.3s (21.0x, -----) ca: 6.8s (15.6x, -----) dr: 5.4s (12.3x, -----) ma: 1.1s ( 2.5x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.44s no: 1.1s ( 2.5x, 0.9%) me: 2.6s ( 5.8x, -0.4%) ca: 2.9s ( 6.6x, 0.3%) he: 9.2s (21.0x, 0.4%) ca: 6.9s (15.6x, -0.1%) dr: 5.4s (12.3x, -0.2%) ma: 1.1s ( 2.4x, 1.8%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.37s no: 2.2s ( 5.9x, -----) me: 8.6s (23.2x, -----) ca:13.8s (37.4x, -----) he:11.1s (30.1x, -----) ca:11.5s (31.1x, -----) dr: 6.7s (18.2x, -----) ma: 4.0s (10.8x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.37s no: 2.2s ( 6.0x, -0.9%) me: 8.5s (23.1x, 0.5%) ca:13.8s (37.2x, 0.6%) he:11.1s (30.1x, 0.0%) ca:11.5s (31.0x, 0.2%) dr: 6.8s (18.3x, -0.6%) ma: 4.0s (10.8x, 0.3%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.38s no: 2.3s ( 6.1x, -----) me:12.4s (32.6x, -----) ca:15.0s (39.5x, -----) he:12.8s (33.7x, -----) ca:12.3s (32.4x, -----) dr: 7.7s (20.1x, -----) ma: 4.0s (10.6x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.38s no: 2.4s ( 6.2x, -1.7%) me:12.5s (32.9x, -0.7%) ca:15.0s (39.5x, 0.1%) he:12.9s (33.8x, -0.3%) ca:12.4s (32.5x, -0.4%) dr: 7.6s (20.0x, 0.5%) ma: 4.0s (10.5x, 0.7%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.4s (14.3x, -----) me: 2.1s (68.7x, -----) ca: 1.9s (63.3x, -----) he: 1.7s (55.3x, -----) ca: 1.7s (57.7x, -----) dr: 1.4s (45.7x, -----) ma: 0.9s (31.0x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.4s (14.3x, 0.0%) me: 2.0s (68.3x, 0.5%) ca: 1.9s (63.0x, 0.5%) he: 1.6s (55.0x, 0.6%) ca: 1.7s (57.7x, 0.0%) dr: 1.4s (46.3x, -1.5%) ma: 0.9s (30.7x, 1.1%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.07s no: 0.6s ( 9.1x, -----) me: 3.3s (46.6x, -----) ca: 4.6s (65.9x, -----) he: 4.0s (57.0x, -----) ca: 2.7s (38.6x, -----) dr: 2.1s (30.1x, -----) ma: 2.3s (32.6x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.07s no: 0.6s ( 9.1x, 0.0%) me: 3.3s (46.7x, -0.3%) ca: 4.6s (65.7x, 0.2%) he: 4.0s (57.1x, -0.3%) ca: 2.7s (38.4x, 0.4%) dr: 2.1s (30.4x, -0.9%) ma: 2.3s (32.3x, 0.9%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.06s no: 1.0s (16.3x, -----) me: 2.0s (33.3x, -----) ca: 5.4s (89.3x, -----) he: 8.0s (132.7x, -----) ca: 3.2s (53.8x, -----) dr: 2.0s (33.3x, -----) ma: 1.1s (19.2x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.06s no: 1.0s (16.2x, 1.0%) me: 1.9s (32.5x, 2.5%) ca: 5.4s (89.5x, -0.2%) he: 7.7s (128.7x, 3.0%) ca: 3.3s (54.5x, -1.2%) dr: 2.0s (33.8x, -1.5%) ma: 1.1s (18.8x, 1.7%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.3x, -----) me: 3.9s (129.7x, -----) ca: 2.9s (95.3x, -----) he: 9.4s (314.0x, -----) ca: 1.6s (55.0x, -----) dr: 1.2s (39.3x, -----) ma: 0.4s (14.7x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.7x, -2.9%) me: 3.9s (131.3x, -1.3%) ca: 2.9s (95.7x, -0.3%) he: 9.4s (312.0x, 0.6%) ca: 1.7s (55.3x, -0.6%) dr: 1.2s (38.7x, 1.7%) ma: 0.4s (14.3x, 2.3%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.27s no: 3.1s (11.6x, -----) me:15.6s (57.8x, -----) ca:18.3s (67.9x, -----) he:18.6s (68.9x, -----) ca:15.4s (57.2x, -----) dr:12.8s (47.4x, -----) ma: 3.4s (12.7x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.27s no: 3.1s (11.6x, 0.0%) me:15.7s (58.0x, -0.3%) ca:18.2s (67.5x, 0.6%) he:18.6s (68.7x, 0.3%) ca:15.4s (57.1x, 0.1%) dr:12.8s (47.6x, -0.4%) ma: 3.4s (12.7x, -0.3%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 56m59.277s user 54m24.039s sys 0m15.776s |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-03 03:42:45
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-03 03:33:24
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-03 03:24:26
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2023-01-03 03:14:44
|
|
From: <ma...@bu...> - 2023-01-03 01:34:14
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-56971834a7-20230102
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20220819 (Red Hat 12.2.1-2)
GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 12.1-2.fc36
Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.37-36.fc36
C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.35.
uname -mrs: Linux 6.0.5-200.fc36.s390x s390x
Vendor version: Fedora Linux 36 (Thirty Six)
Nightly build on lfedora1 ( Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six), s390x )
Started at 2023-01-03 00:00:01 UTC
Ended at 2023-01-03 01:04:57 UTC
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 791 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
system: valgrind ./system
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 791 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 791 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
syslog: valgrind -q ./syslog
system: valgrind ./system
thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits
threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork
threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno
timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp
tls: valgrind ./tls
unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog
vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf
vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind
-- Finished tests in none/tests ----------------------------------------
== 791 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [Makefile:1420: regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2023-01-03 00:32:23.316038284 +0000
--- new.short 2023-01-03 01:04:57.246157741 +0000
***************
*** 8,11 ****
! == 791 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
--- 8,12 ----
! == 791 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
+ memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
***************
*** 15,17 ****
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
- syslog: valgrind -q ./syslog
system: valgrind ./system
--- 16,17 ----
***************
*** 27,30 ****
! == 791 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
--- 27,31 ----
! == 791 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
+ memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:32:24.616038284 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-03 01:00:06.266157741 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-03 00:32:24.886038284 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-03 00:41:27.076088244 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:32:26.286038284 +0000
+++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:46:10.296111934 +0000
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
O_NONBLOCK test ...
waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
+got timer ticks (1) after 0.3 s
success
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
O_NONBLOCK test ...
waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
+got timer ticks (1) after 0.2 s
success
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:32:26.396038284 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:53:01.946147741 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:00:28.835755828 +0000
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:22:07.845969112 +0000
@@ -6,10 +6,43 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ???
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-03 00:00:28.905755828 +0000
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-03 00:06:38.845793036 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
@@ -11,6 +15,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2648 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/vbit-test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- vbit-test.stderr.exp 2023-01-03 00:00:29.015755828 +0000
+++ vbit-test.stderr.out 2023-01-03 00:13:47.855870133 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ ...
+
|
|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2023-01-01 10:33:33
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-8224cf37a9-20221231
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-170-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2023-01-01 00:00:01 PST
Ended at 2023-01-01 02:33:19 PST
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 647 tests, 20 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.21s no: 3.6s (17.0x, -----) me: 7.9s (37.5x, -----) ca:35.4s (168.5x, -----) he: 4.2s (19.9x, -----) ca: 9.5s (45.2x, -----) dr: 4.2s (19.8x, -----) ma: 4.4s (20.9x, -----)
bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.21s no: 3.6s (17.1x, -0.8%) me: 7.9s (37.8x, -0.8%) ca:35.4s (168.3x, 0.1%) he: 4.2s (20.0x, -0.2%) ca: 9.5s (45.2x, 0.1%) dr: 4.8s (22.7x,-14.4%) ma: 4.3s (20.7x, 0.9%)
-- bigcode2 --
bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.21s no:10.9s (51.9x, -----) me:18.6s (88.7x, -----) ca:69.0s (328.5x, -----) he:10.8s (51.7x, -----) ca:19.6s (93.5x, -----) dr:10.4s (49.3x, -----) ma:12.8s (60.9x, -----)
bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.21s no: 9.2s (43.6x, 15.9%) me:22.4s (106.9x,-20.5%) ca:68.9s (328.1x, 0.1%) he:10.8s (51.5x, 0.4%) ca:19.6s (93.2x, 0.4%) dr:11.6s (55.4x,-12.3%) ma:10.6s (50.4x, 17.3%)
-- bz2 --
bz2 valgrind-new:1.12s no: 3.9s ( 3.5x, -----) me:14.7s (13.1x, -----) ca:40.2s (35.9x, -----) he:20.2s (18.0x, -----) ca:30.9s (27.6x, -----) dr:29.9s (26.7x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -----)
bz2 valgrind-old:1.12s no: 3.9s ( 3.5x, 0.3%) me:14.3s (12.7x, 2.6%) ca:40.9s (36.5x, -1.7%) he:20.9s (18.7x, -3.8%) ca:30.9s (27.6x, 0.1%) dr:30.2s (26.9x, -1.1%) ma: 4.2s ( 3.8x, -0.5%)
-- fbench --
fbench valgrind-new:0.54s no: 4.1s ( 7.6x, -----) me: 8.3s (15.4x, -----) ca:16.7s (30.9x, -----) he: 6.9s (12.8x, -----) ca:10.2s (18.9x, -----) dr: 8.5s (15.7x, -----) ma: 4.2s ( 7.7x, -----)
fbench valgrind-old:0.54s no: 4.0s ( 7.5x, 1.0%) me: 8.1s (15.0x, 2.5%) ca:16.7s (30.9x, -0.1%) he: 6.8s (12.5x, 2.3%) ca:10.2s (18.9x, -0.1%) dr: 8.5s (15.7x, -0.2%) ma: 4.2s ( 7.7x, 0.0%)
-- ffbench --
ffbench valgrind-new:0.53s no: 2.9s ( 5.5x, -----) me: 5.8s (11.0x, -----) ca: 5.9s (11.1x, -----) he:16.7s (31.5x, -----) ca:11.2s (21.1x, -----) dr:10.0s (18.9x, -----) ma: 3.2s ( 6.0x, -----)
ffbench valgrind-old:0.53s no: 2.9s ( 5.5x, -0.3%) me: 5.9s (11.2x, -2.1%) ca: 5.9s (11.1x, 0.3%) he:16.7s (31.4x, 0.2%) ca:11.2s (21.1x, 0.0%) dr:10.0s (18.8x, 0.2%) ma: 3.2s ( 6.1x, -1.6%)
-- heap --
heap valgrind-new:0.55s no: 2.6s ( 4.7x, -----) me:11.6s (21.0x, -----) ca:23.0s (41.9x, -----) he:17.3s (31.4x, -----) ca:12.9s (23.4x, -----) dr:10.2s (18.5x, -----) ma: 6.0s (10.9x, -----)
heap valgrind-old:0.55s no: 2.6s ( 4.7x, -0.4%) me:11.6s (21.0x, -0.2%) ca:23.1s (42.0x, -0.2%) he:17.0s (30.9x, 1.5%) ca:12.9s (23.5x, -0.3%) dr:10.2s (18.6x, -0.4%) ma: 6.0s (10.8x, 0.7%)
-- heap_pdb4 --
heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.58s no: 2.9s ( 4.9x, -----) me:18.1s (31.3x, -----) ca:24.4s (42.0x, -----) he:19.4s (33.5x, -----) ca:15.0s (25.8x, -----) dr:11.9s (20.5x, -----) ma: 6.1s (10.5x, -----)
heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.58s no: 2.8s ( 4.8x, 3.5%) me:18.4s (31.8x, -1.7%) ca:24.3s (41.9x, 0.2%) he:18.9s (32.6x, 2.6%) ca:14.9s (25.8x, 0.2%) dr:11.7s (20.2x, 1.5%) ma: 6.2s (10.6x, -1.0%)
-- many-loss-records --
many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.07s no: 0.6s ( 9.1x, -----) me: 3.2s (46.1x, -----) ca: 3.4s (48.1x, -----) he: 2.7s (39.0x, -----) ca: 2.4s (34.6x, -----) dr: 2.6s (36.9x, -----) ma: 1.7s (24.1x, -----)
many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.3x, -1.6%) me: 3.2s (46.4x, -0.6%) ca: 3.7s (52.4x, -8.9%) he: 2.7s (38.6x, 1.1%) ca: 2.4s (34.4x, 0.4%) dr: 2.4s (34.6x, 6.2%) ma: 1.7s (23.7x, 1.8%)
-- many-xpts --
many-xpts valgrind-new:0.10s no: 0.9s ( 8.9x, -----) me: 3.5s (34.8x, -----) ca: 8.3s (83.0x, -----) he: 4.5s (45.1x, -----) ca: 3.6s (36.0x, -----) dr: 3.7s (36.6x, -----) ma: 3.5s (35.1x, -----)
many-xpts valgrind-old:0.10s no: 0.9s ( 8.8x, 1.1%) me: 3.7s (36.6x, -5.2%) ca: 8.2s (82.5x, 0.6%) he: 4.5s (44.7x, 0.9%) ca: 3.5s (35.2x, 2.2%) dr: 3.6s (35.7x, 2.5%) ma: 3.7s (36.8x, -4.8%)
-- memrw --
memrw valgrind-new:0.30s no: 1.1s ( 3.7x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 8.8x, -----) ca: 8.6s (28.6x, -----) he:15.4s (51.5x, -----) ca: 4.2s (13.9x, -----) dr: 3.2s (10.7x, -----) ma: 1.4s ( 4.7x, -----)
memrw valgrind-old:0.30s no: 1.1s ( 3.7x, 1.8%) me: 2.7s ( 8.9x, -1.1%) ca: 8.6s (28.8x, -0.6%) he:15.5s (51.7x, -0.4%) ca: 4.1s (13.8x, 0.7%) dr: 3.1s (10.4x, 2.8%) ma: 1.4s ( 4.8x, -1.4%)
-- sarp --
sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.6s (19.7x, -----) me: 3.8s (127.0x, -----) ca: 4.7s (156.3x, -----) he:10.6s (354.0x, -----) ca: 2.3s (77.7x, -----) dr: 1.9s (64.0x, -----) ma: 0.8s (26.3x, -----)
sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.7x, 5.1%) me: 3.8s (127.7x, -0.5%) ca: 4.7s (156.0x, 0.2%) he:10.8s (358.7x, -1.3%) ca: 2.3s (75.7x, 2.6%) dr: 2.0s (66.7x, -4.2%) ma: 0.8s (26.7x, -1.3%)
-- tinycc --
tinycc valgrind-new:0.38s no: 4.7s (12.5x, -----) me:28.6s (75.1x, -----) ca:46.8s (123.0x, -----) he:24.0s (63.2x, -----) ca:36.8s (96.8x, -----) dr:25.5s (67.1x, -----) ma: 6.1s (16.0x, -----)
tinycc valgrind-old:0.38s no: 4.7s (12.4x, 0.6%) me:25.6s (67.4x, 10.3%) ca:50.4s (132.6x, -7.8%) he:26.4s (69.3x, -9.8%) ca:42.6s (112.2x,-15.9%) dr:22.6s (59.5x, 11.3%) ma: 8.8s (23.2x,-45.1%)
-- Finished tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
== 12 programs, 168 timings =================
5812.08user 47.85system 1:37:46elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 532180maxresident)k
0inputs+481024outputs (0major+14758251minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.570823818 -0800
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:49:21.099114365 -0800
@@ -6,10 +6,42 @@
signalling
sleeping
nullHandler running
-unlocking
+Thread 2:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: contender_start (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: start_thread
+ by 0x........: clone (in /...libc...)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
contender unlocked mutex
+unlocking
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
joining thread
+Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_mutex_signal.c:?)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/std_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- std_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.570823818 -0800
+++ std_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:23.447426546 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
-Done.
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_rethrow (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_emplace_back_aux<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:426)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:101)
+ by 0x........: main (std_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:52.044694892 -0800
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:52.044694892 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:52.044694892 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2023-01-01 00:28:08.580822861 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2023-01-01 00:28:08.570823818 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-01-01 00:28:08.570823818 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
@@ -15,19 +16,21 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:5)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
@@ -37,18 +40,12 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-01-01 00:28:08.570823818 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:51:57.504173393 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/timed_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timed_mutex.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.560824774 -0800
+++ timed_mutex.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:52:49.209234397 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_throw (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::_M_start_thread(std::shared_ptr<std::thread::_Impl_base>) (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::thread::thread<void (&)()>(void (&)()) (thread:...)
+ by 0x........: main (timed_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.410839119 -0800
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-01-01 00:35:09.810535544 -0800
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.410839119 -0800
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2023-01-01 00:35:13.320199869 -0800
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.760805647 -0800
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:42:34.328020162 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (hg05_race2.c:23)
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (hg05_race2.c:23)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.740807560 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2023-01-01 00:28:08.740807560 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2023-01-01 00:28:08.760805647 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2023-01-01 00:28:08.750806604 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2023-01-01 00:28:08.750806604 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2023-01-01 00:28:08.750806604 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-01 00:28:08.750806604 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:44:01.159715155 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_trylock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:131)
@@ -74,7 +82,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_timedlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:136)
@@ -89,7 +97,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:140)
@@ -142,7 +150,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:180)
@@ -158,22 +166,13 @@
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside rwl.__pthread_rwlock_readers,
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_rwlock_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
-
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.470833381 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:37:00.549944067 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-01-01 00:28:08.510829556 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:37:00.549944067 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/sigaltstack.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- sigaltstack.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.530827643 -0800
+++ sigaltstack.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:39:34.195248851 -0800
@@ -4,3 +4,51 @@
raising the signal
caught signal, local var is on 0x........
done
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 4
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.450835293 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:39:47.653961605 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2023-01-01 00:28:08.460834337 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:39:47.653961605 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.470833381 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:40:39.509001971 -0800
@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp-ppc64 2023-01-01 00:28:08.510829556 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:40:39.509001971 -0800
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo3.stderr.exp 2023-01-01 00:28:08.460834337 -0800
+++ varinfo3.stderr.out 2023-01-01 00:40:44.248548660 -0800
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:43)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_def[6],
- declared at varinfo3.c:51, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo3.c:28)
@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:45)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_undef[8],
- declared at varinfo3.c:53, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-01 05:54:42
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-8224cf37a9-20221231 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-1127.13.1.el7.ppc64le ppc64le Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc112 ( \S, ppc64le ) Started at 2023-01-01 03:00:02 UTC Ended at 2023-01-01 05:54:23 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 671 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo system: valgrind ./system thread-exits: valgrind ./thread-exits threaded-fork: valgrind ./threaded-fork threadederrno: valgrind -q ./threadederrno timestamp: valgrind --time-stamp=yes ./timestamp tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- == 671 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.38s no: 5.8s (15.2x, -----) me: 9.0s (23.7x, -----) ca:28.6s (75.3x, -----) he: 7.5s (19.8x, -----) ca:15.1s (39.7x, -----) dr: 7.1s (18.6x, -----) ma: 6.6s (17.3x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.38s no: 7.3s (19.2x,-26.5%) me:11.7s (30.8x,-29.8%) ca:35.3s (92.9x,-23.4%) he: 8.2s (21.6x, -8.9%) ca:16.3s (42.9x, -8.1%) dr: 7.8s (20.6x,-10.9%) ma: 7.3s (19.2x,-10.9%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.39s no:13.8s (35.3x, -----) me:27.9s (71.4x, -----) ca:56.4s (144.6x, -----) he:14.9s (38.1x, -----) ca:23.8s (61.0x, -----) dr:14.6s (37.5x, -----) ma:16.4s (42.0x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.39s no:13.6s (34.9x, 0.9%) me:26.2s (67.1x, 6.1%) ca:51.3s (131.6x, 9.0%) he:16.4s (42.1x,-10.5%) ca:18.0s (46.2x, 24.4%) dr:12.6s (32.3x, 13.9%) ma:12.5s (32.0x, 23.9%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:0.67s no: 6.7s (10.1x, -----) me:19.6s (29.2x, -----) ca:33.7s (50.3x, -----) he:22.7s (33.9x, -----) ca:34.3s (51.2x, -----) dr:26.3s (39.3x, -----) ma: 6.7s (10.0x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:0.67s no: 6.7s (10.0x, 0.6%) me:20.6s (30.8x, -5.3%) ca:38.7s (57.7x,-14.8%) he:30.5s (45.5x,-34.1%) ca:39.8s (59.4x,-16.1%) dr:33.2s (49.5x,-26.1%) ma: 9.4s (14.0x,-40.2%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.50s no: 4.0s ( 8.1x, -----) me: 9.4s (18.8x, -----) ca:10.1s (20.2x, -----) he: 7.1s (14.2x, -----) ca:13.9s (27.8x, -----) dr: 8.3s (16.7x, -----) ma: 3.9s ( 7.7x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.50s no: 4.0s ( 8.0x, 1.5%) me: 9.6s (19.2x, -2.3%) ca:13.1s (26.1x,-29.4%) he: 7.5s (15.1x, -6.4%) ca:12.4s (24.8x, 10.6%) dr: 6.5s (12.9x, 22.4%) ma: 3.7s ( 7.4x, 4.4%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.35s no: 1.4s ( 4.1x, -----) me: 4.0s (11.3x, -----) ca: 3.3s ( 9.4x, -----) he:12.4s (35.5x, -----) ca:13.1s (37.5x, -----) dr: 8.4s (24.0x, -----) ma: 1.5s ( 4.2x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.35s no: 1.4s ( 4.0x, 4.1%) me: 4.9s (14.1x,-24.2%) ca: 3.0s ( 8.7x, 7.9%) he:11.3s (32.2x, 9.4%) ca:12.3s (35.1x, 6.5%) dr: 7.9s (22.7x, 5.5%) ma: 1.5s ( 4.4x, -4.1%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.51s no: 3.1s ( 6.0x, -----) me: 9.8s (19.3x, -----) ca:13.9s (27.2x, -----) he:11.1s (21.8x, -----) ca:13.3s (26.0x, -----) dr: 7.1s (13.9x, -----) ma: 4.1s ( 8.1x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.51s no: 2.7s ( 5.3x, 12.0%) me: 9.2s (18.0x, 6.9%) ca:14.7s (28.9x, -6.1%) he:11.7s (22.8x, -5.0%) ca:14.0s (27.4x, -5.4%) dr: 7.1s (14.0x, -0.6%) ma: 3.7s ( 7.2x, 10.5%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.30s no: 2.8s ( 9.4x, -----) me:13.4s (44.6x, -----) ca:15.4s (51.2x, -----) he:12.6s (42.1x, -----) ca:16.6s (55.3x, -----) dr:10.4s (34.6x, -----) ma: 5.8s (19.2x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.30s no: 4.4s (14.7x,-56.2%) me:16.9s (56.5x,-26.6%) ca:22.3s (74.2x,-44.9%) he:16.1s (53.6x,-27.4%) ca:22.4s (74.6x,-34.9%) dr: 9.2s (30.5x, 11.9%) ma: 6.7s (22.5x,-17.2%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.8s (16.0x, -----) me: 2.5s (50.4x, -----) ca: 2.9s (57.8x, -----) he: 2.5s (49.2x, -----) ca: 2.9s (57.0x, -----) dr: 2.1s (42.8x, -----) ma: 1.2s (25.0x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.05s no: 0.8s (15.4x, 3.8%) me: 3.0s (60.8x,-20.6%) ca: 2.8s (56.8x, 1.7%) he: 2.6s (52.8x, -7.3%) ca: 2.7s (54.6x, 4.2%) dr: 2.5s (50.2x,-17.3%) ma: 1.4s (29.0x,-16.0%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.09s no: 1.4s (15.4x, -----) me: 4.9s (54.8x, -----) ca: 6.0s (66.7x, -----) he: 5.2s (57.6x, -----) ca: 4.3s (47.4x, -----) dr: 3.7s (41.2x, -----) ma: 3.5s (38.3x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.09s no: 1.4s (15.2x, 1.4%) me: 3.5s (38.4x, 29.8%) ca: 6.6s (73.6x,-10.3%) he: 4.1s (45.9x, 20.3%) ca: 3.9s (42.8x, 9.8%) dr: 3.9s (43.7x, -5.9%) ma: 3.3s (36.6x, 4.6%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.11s no: 2.0s (18.6x, -----) me: 4.5s (40.8x, -----) ca: 7.7s (70.4x, -----) he:10.1s (91.8x, -----) ca: 7.9s (71.8x, -----) dr: 3.7s (33.4x, -----) ma: 2.3s (20.5x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.11s no: 2.2s (20.5x, -9.8%) me: 3.8s (34.2x, 16.3%) ca: 8.5s (77.5x,-10.1%) he: 9.0s (81.5x, 11.2%) ca: 7.2s (65.5x, 8.7%) dr: 4.2s (38.4x,-15.0%) ma: 2.4s (21.7x, -5.8%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.05s no: 0.8s (16.8x, -----) me: 5.6s (112.4x, -----) ca: 3.4s (67.8x, -----) he: 9.2s (184.6x, -----) ca: 2.7s (54.2x, -----) dr: 2.1s (41.8x, -----) ma: 0.9s (17.6x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.05s no: 0.6s (12.6x, 25.0%) me: 4.8s (96.8x, 13.9%) ca: 3.0s (60.4x, 10.9%) he: 9.5s (190.4x, -3.1%) ca: 2.6s (52.4x, 3.3%) dr: 2.0s (40.4x, 3.3%) ma: 0.7s (14.2x, 19.3%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.33s no: 3.5s (10.6x, -----) me:18.1s (54.7x, -----) ca:16.4s (49.8x, -----) he:19.0s (57.5x, -----) ca:25.1s (75.9x, -----) dr:23.6s (71.5x, -----) ma: 5.8s (17.6x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.33s no: 5.9s (17.9x,-68.6%) me:26.7s (81.0x,-48.0%) ca:25.6s (77.6x,-56.0%) he:20.7s (62.8x, -9.4%) ca:22.4s (67.8x, 10.7%) dr:22.3s (67.5x, 5.5%) ma: 6.3s (19.0x, -7.7%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 101m53.754s user 95m36.875s sys 0m20.288s |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2023-01-01 04:57:51
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-8224cf37a9-20221231 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.ppc64 ppc64 Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) Nightly build on gcc110 ( \S, ppc64 ) Started at 2023-01-01 03:00:03 UTC Ended at 2023-01-01 04:57:40 UTC Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 703 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo tls: valgrind ./tls unit_debuglog: valgrind -q ./unit_debuglog vgprintf: valgrind ./vgprintf vgprintf_nvalgrind: valgrind ./vgprintf_nvalgrind -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- -- Running tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- ll: valgrind --interval-size=1000 --bb-out-file=ll.out.bb ./ll million: valgrind --interval-size=100000 --bb-out-file=million.out.bb ./million -- Finished tests in exp-bbv/tests/ppc32-linux ------------------------- == 703 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr) drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr) ...checking makefile consistency ...checking header files and include directives make: *** [regtest] Error 1 --tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old -- Running tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- -- bigcode1 -- bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.23s no: 1.6s ( 6.8x, -----) me: 2.8s (12.3x, -----) ca:21.7s (94.4x, -----) he: 1.8s ( 7.7x, -----) ca: 5.4s (23.5x, -----) dr: 1.8s ( 7.9x, -----) ma: 2.4s (10.2x, -----) bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.23s no: 2.0s ( 8.6x,-26.3%) me: 3.5s (15.3x,-24.4%) ca:22.7s (98.6x, -4.4%) he: 1.9s ( 8.1x, -4.5%) ca: 5.5s (23.9x, -1.5%) dr: 1.8s ( 7.9x, 0.0%) ma: 2.2s ( 9.6x, 6.0%) -- bigcode2 -- bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.23s no: 1.5s ( 6.4x, -----) me: 3.0s (13.2x, -----) ca:21.8s (94.6x, -----) he: 2.0s ( 8.9x, -----) ca: 5.5s (23.9x, -----) dr: 1.8s ( 7.8x, -----) ma: 2.2s ( 9.4x, -----) bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.23s no: 1.5s ( 6.5x, -1.4%) me: 3.0s (13.0x, 2.0%) ca:21.3s (92.4x, 2.3%) he: 2.1s ( 9.2x, -3.4%) ca: 5.5s (24.0x, -0.4%) dr: 1.8s ( 7.8x, 0.0%) ma: 2.5s (10.9x,-16.2%) -- bz2 -- bz2 valgrind-new:0.75s no: 4.5s ( 6.0x, -----) me:12.9s (17.2x, -----) ca:30.0s (40.0x, -----) he:15.1s (20.2x, -----) ca:22.9s (30.5x, -----) dr:19.0s (25.3x, -----) ma: 4.5s ( 6.0x, -----) bz2 valgrind-old:0.75s no: 4.5s ( 6.0x, 0.2%) me:12.9s (17.2x, 0.0%) ca:30.1s (40.1x, -0.1%) he:15.2s (20.2x, -0.3%) ca:22.9s (30.6x, -0.2%) dr:19.0s (25.3x, -0.1%) ma: 4.5s ( 6.1x, -0.4%) -- fbench -- fbench valgrind-new:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.9x, -----) me: 6.4s (18.3x, -----) ca: 9.4s (26.9x, -----) he: 5.4s (15.5x, -----) ca: 7.9s (22.5x, -----) dr: 5.3s (15.3x, -----) ma: 2.5s ( 7.1x, -----) fbench valgrind-old:0.35s no: 2.4s ( 6.8x, 0.8%) me: 6.5s (18.5x, -0.6%) ca: 9.4s (27.0x, -0.3%) he: 5.4s (15.4x, 0.4%) ca: 7.9s (22.5x, -0.1%) dr: 5.3s (15.2x, 0.7%) ma: 2.5s ( 7.2x, -0.4%) -- ffbench -- ffbench valgrind-new:0.43s no: 1.1s ( 2.6x, -----) me: 2.6s ( 6.0x, -----) ca: 2.9s ( 6.7x, -----) he: 9.2s (21.5x, -----) ca: 6.8s (15.9x, -----) dr: 5.5s (12.7x, -----) ma: 1.1s ( 2.5x, -----) ffbench valgrind-old:0.43s no: 1.1s ( 2.6x, -0.9%) me: 2.6s ( 6.0x, 0.8%) ca: 2.9s ( 6.8x, -1.0%) he: 9.2s (21.5x, -0.1%) ca: 6.8s (15.9x, -0.1%) dr: 5.4s (12.7x, 0.4%) ma: 1.1s ( 2.5x, -1.9%) -- heap -- heap valgrind-new:0.36s no: 2.2s ( 6.2x, -----) me: 8.6s (23.8x, -----) ca:13.8s (38.4x, -----) he:11.1s (30.7x, -----) ca:11.5s (31.9x, -----) dr: 6.9s (19.1x, -----) ma: 4.0s (11.0x, -----) heap valgrind-old:0.36s no: 2.2s ( 6.1x, 1.8%) me: 8.5s (23.7x, 0.4%) ca:13.8s (38.3x, 0.3%) he:11.1s (30.8x, -0.4%) ca:11.5s (31.9x, -0.1%) dr: 6.8s (19.0x, 0.6%) ma: 4.0s (11.0x, 0.3%) -- heap_pdb4 -- heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.40s no: 2.3s ( 5.8x, -----) me:12.4s (31.1x, -----) ca:15.0s (37.6x, -----) he:12.8s (32.0x, -----) ca:12.3s (30.8x, -----) dr: 7.7s (19.2x, -----) ma: 4.0s ( 9.9x, -----) heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.40s no: 2.3s ( 5.7x, 2.1%) me:12.7s (31.7x, -1.8%) ca:14.9s (37.3x, 0.6%) he:12.8s (31.9x, 0.2%) ca:12.3s (30.9x, -0.2%) dr: 7.6s (19.1x, 0.7%) ma: 4.1s (10.1x, -2.8%) -- many-loss-records -- many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.4s (14.7x, -----) me: 2.0s (68.3x, -----) ca: 1.9s (63.0x, -----) he: 1.7s (55.7x, -----) ca: 1.7s (57.7x, -----) dr: 1.4s (46.0x, -----) ma: 0.9s (31.0x, -----) many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.4s (13.3x, 9.1%) me: 2.0s (68.3x, 0.0%) ca: 1.9s (63.3x, -0.5%) he: 1.7s (55.3x, 0.6%) ca: 1.7s (58.0x, -0.6%) dr: 1.4s (47.0x, -2.2%) ma: 0.9s (30.7x, 1.1%) -- many-xpts -- many-xpts valgrind-new:0.06s no: 0.6s (10.5x, -----) me: 3.3s (54.8x, -----) ca: 4.6s (77.0x, -----) he: 3.9s (65.7x, -----) ca: 2.7s (44.7x, -----) dr: 2.1s (34.8x, -----) ma: 2.3s (38.2x, -----) many-xpts valgrind-old:0.06s no: 0.6s (10.3x, 1.6%) me: 3.3s (55.0x, -0.3%) ca: 4.6s (77.0x, 0.0%) he: 3.9s (65.7x, 0.0%) ca: 2.7s (44.8x, -0.4%) dr: 2.1s (35.3x, -1.4%) ma: 2.3s (37.7x, 1.3%) -- memrw -- memrw valgrind-new:0.06s no: 1.0s (16.5x, -----) me: 1.9s (32.3x, -----) ca: 5.3s (89.2x, -----) he: 7.7s (128.7x, -----) ca: 3.3s (54.5x, -----) dr: 2.0s (34.0x, -----) ma: 1.1s (18.5x, -----) memrw valgrind-old:0.06s no: 1.0s (16.2x, 2.0%) me: 2.0s (32.7x, -1.0%) ca: 5.3s (89.2x, 0.0%) he: 8.0s (132.8x, -3.2%) ca: 3.2s (53.5x, 1.8%) dr: 2.1s (34.3x, -1.0%) ma: 1.1s (19.0x, -2.7%) -- sarp -- sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.3x, -----) me: 3.9s (129.7x, -----) ca: 2.8s (94.0x, -----) he: 9.4s (313.3x, -----) ca: 1.7s (55.3x, -----) dr: 1.2s (38.7x, -----) ma: 0.4s (14.0x, -----) sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.3s (11.0x, 2.9%) me: 3.9s (131.3x, -1.3%) ca: 2.8s (94.3x, -0.4%) he: 9.4s (313.7x, -0.1%) ca: 1.6s (55.0x, 0.6%) dr: 1.2s (39.0x, -0.9%) ma: 0.5s (15.3x, -9.5%) -- tinycc -- tinycc valgrind-new:0.24s no: 3.1s (13.0x, -----) me:15.6s (65.1x, -----) ca:18.3s (76.1x, -----) he:18.6s (77.3x, -----) ca:15.4s (64.2x, -----) dr:12.8s (53.3x, -----) ma: 3.4s (14.2x, -----) tinycc valgrind-old:0.24s no: 3.1s (13.0x, 0.0%) me:15.6s (65.1x, 0.1%) ca:18.3s (76.2x, -0.1%) he:18.5s (77.2x, 0.1%) ca:15.5s (64.5x, -0.3%) dr:12.9s (53.6x, -0.5%) ma: 3.4s (14.2x, 0.3%) -- Finished tests in perf ---------------------------------------------- == 12 programs, 168 timings ================= real 73m9.407s user 54m32.238s sys 0m15.704s |