|
From: Mark W. <ma...@kl...> - 2018-02-12 15:27:39
|
Hi, The experimental sgcheck tool is in a pretty bad state. On some systems it doesn't even run a simple /bin/true program because it doesn't support guarded loads/stores. It is also the only tool which really uses some of the debuginfo var/type/location data. Given the tool has been experimental, nobody is working on fixing it, it has been broken since some years now and it prevents some cleanups/updates to the debuginfo reader I am proposing to remove it. If the tool is really important to you, then please let me know if you can help with maintaining it. Thanks, Mark |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2018-02-12 19:46:21
|
2018-02-12 16:27 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...>: > Hi, > > The experimental sgcheck tool is in a pretty bad state. On some systems > it doesn't even run a simple /bin/true program because it doesn't > support guarded loads/stores. It is also the only tool which really > uses some of the debuginfo var/type/location data. Given the tool has > been experimental, nobody is working on fixing it, it has been broken > since some years now and it prevents some cleanups/updates to the > debuginfo reader I am proposing to remove it. > > If the tool is really important to you, then please let me know if you > can help with maintaining it. Thank you, Mark, for bringing this topic. I am in agreement. I. |
|
From: Paul F. <pa...@fr...> - 2018-02-12 20:06:17
|
> On 12 Feb 2018, at 20:46, Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> wrote: > > 2018-02-12 16:27 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...>: >> Hi, >> >> The experimental sgcheck tool is in a pretty bad state. On some systems >> it doesn't even run a simple /bin/true program because it doesn't >> support guarded loads/stores. It is also the only tool which really >> uses some of the debuginfo var/type/location data. Given the tool has >> been experimental, nobody is working on fixing it, it has been broken >> since some years now and it prevents some cleanups/updates to the >> debuginfo reader I am proposing to remove it. >> >> If the tool is really important to you, then please let me know if you >> can help with maintaining it. > > Thank you, Mark, for bringing this topic. > I am in agreement. Hi I’ve never much used sgcheck, as it does seem to generate a lot of noise. I wouldn’t miss it either. A+ Paul |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2018-02-12 20:09:12
|
I would also be in favour of removing it. Doing so would remove several thousand LOC from the tree, perhaps over 10K. Anything that sgcheck can do, ASan can do faster and with a lower noise level. So I don't think it would be missed. J |