|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2005-08-08 02:24:18
|
Nightly build on ginetta ( i686, Red Hat 8.0 ) started at 2005-08-08 03:10:07 BST Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 180 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 180 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Aug 8 03:17:55 2005 --- new.short Mon Aug 8 03:24:12 2005 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 180 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) --- 8,11 ---- ! == 180 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= ! memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) |
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-08-08 15:08:29
|
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Tom Hughes wrote: > ================================================= > == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == > ================================================= > > *** old.short Mon Aug 8 03:17:55 2005 > --- new.short Mon Aug 8 03:24:12 2005 > *************** > *** 8,10 **** > > ! == 180 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= > none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) > --- 8,11 ---- > > ! == 180 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= > ! memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) > none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) Who broke 'scalar'? It happened on three of the test machines... N |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2005-08-08 18:33:56
|
In message <Pin...@ch...>
Nicholas Nethercote <nj...@cs...> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> > ! == 180 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures =================
> > none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
> > --- 8,11 ----
> >
> > ! == 180 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures =================
> > ! memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr)
> > none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
>
> Who broke 'scalar'? It happened on three of the test machines...
That would be me... It should be fixed now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-08-08 18:36:29
|
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Tom Hughes wrote: >> Who broke 'scalar'? It happened on three of the test machines... > > That would be me... It should be fixed now. Thanks! |