|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-07-27 00:58:10
|
Dear developers and arch maintainers, A new VEX register allocator version 3 has been developed: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553 based on design by Julian and is now pending review and testing on all supported architectures. I've successfully tested it on x86/Linux and amd64/Linux: - regression tests are ok - performance is better than with the previous register allocator (v2) - produced code is comparable or only marginally worse (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553#c36) Please review especially changes in architecture specific files and ideally try the patches. Thank you! I. |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-07-31 11:11:08
|
Dear developers and arch maintainers, so far I've received one positive feedback from Christian Borntraeger. Anyone else would review or test the patches on something else than x86/amd64/sparc64/s390x? I. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> Date: 2017-07-27 2:58 GMT+02:00 Subject: VEX register allocator v3 To: valgrind Developers <val...@li...> Dear developers and arch maintainers, A new VEX register allocator version 3 has been developed: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553 based on design by Julian and is now pending review and testing on all supported architectures. I've successfully tested it on x86/Linux and amd64/Linux: - regression tests are ok - performance is better than with the previous register allocator (v2) - produced code is comparable or only marginally worse (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553#c36) Please review especially changes in architecture specific files and ideally try the patches. Thank you! I. |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2017-07-31 11:59:01
|
> so far I've received one positive feedback from Christian Borntraeger. > Anyone else would review or test the patches on something > else than x86/amd64/sparc64/s390x? Nice work. I will try it out on arm32 and arm64 this week. J |
|
From: Rhys K. <rhy...@gm...> - 2017-07-31 11:41:56
|
I plan this week on doing a quick check on macOS, primarily to ensure there are no issues that pop up with clang. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:12 AM Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> wrote: > Dear developers and arch maintainers, > > so far I've received one positive feedback from Christian Borntraeger. > Anyone else would review or test the patches on something > else than x86/amd64/sparc64/s390x? > > I. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> > Date: 2017-07-27 2:58 GMT+02:00 > Subject: VEX register allocator v3 > To: valgrind Developers <val...@li...> > > > Dear developers and arch maintainers, > > A new VEX register allocator version 3 has been developed: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553 > based on design by Julian > > and is now pending review and testing on all supported > architectures. I've successfully tested it on x86/Linux and amd64/Linux: > - regression tests are ok > - performance is better than with the previous register allocator (v2) > - produced code is comparable or only marginally worse > (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381553#c36) > > Please review especially changes in architecture specific files > and ideally try the patches. > > Thank you! > I. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-07-31 11:47:17
|
2017-07-31 13:41 GMT+02:00 Rhys Kidd <rhy...@gm...>: > I plan this week on doing a quick check on macOS, primarily to ensure there > are no issues that pop up with clang. Awesome! Let me know your findings. I. |
|
From: Rhys K. <rhy...@gm...> - 2017-08-06 20:28:38
|
On 31 July 2017 at 07:47, Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> wrote: > 2017-07-31 13:41 GMT+02:00 Rhys Kidd <rhy...@gm...>: > > I plan this week on doing a quick check on macOS, primarily to ensure > there > > are no issues that pop up with clang. > > Awesome! > Let me know your findings. > I. > Compile and regression suite tested on AMD64/Darwin (macOS 10.11, clang-800.0.42.1). No new regressions seen with v13 of the patches. Looks good for the macOS platform. |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-08-06 20:35:20
|
2017-08-06 22:28 GMT+02:00 Rhys Kidd <rhy...@gm...>: > On 31 July 2017 at 07:47, Ivo Raisr <iv...@iv...> wrote: >> >> 2017-07-31 13:41 GMT+02:00 Rhys Kidd <rhy...@gm...>: >> > I plan this week on doing a quick check on macOS, primarily to ensure >> > there >> > are no issues that pop up with clang. >> >> Awesome! >> Let me know your findings. >> I. > > > Compile and regression suite tested on AMD64/Darwin (macOS 10.11, > clang-800.0.42.1). No new regressions seen with v13 of the patches. > > Looks good for the macOS platform. Thank you, Rhys! I. |