|
From: Dave N. <dc...@us...> - 2006-10-23 20:51:14
|
I am reporting a problem to Red Hat that their RHEL5 release is missing the ppc64-linux diretory in /usr/lib/valgrind. For the x86 family under what circumstances would I expect the corresponding <arch>64-linux directory in /usr/lib/valgrind, and what is it's name? |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2006-10-23 21:02:22
|
In message <453...@us...>
Dave Nomura <dc...@us...> wrote:
> I am reporting a problem to Red Hat that their RHEL5 release is missing
> the ppc64-linux diretory in /usr/lib/valgrind.
>
> For the x86 family under what circumstances would I expect the
> corresponding <arch>64-linux directory in /usr/lib/valgrind, and what is
> it's name?
It's amd64 and you should get it whenever you build on an x86-64
machine unless you specifically ask configure not to do so.
Likewise for ppc64 when building on a 64 bit PPC machine.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-10-24 12:53:50
|
On Monday 23 October 2006 21:49, Dave Nomura wrote: > I am reporting a problem to Red Hat that their RHEL5 release is missing > the ppc64-linux diretory in /usr/lib/valgrind. ppc64-linux is only supported by V >= 3.2.0. If they are shipping 3.1.X then you would only expect to see ppc32-linux/. > For the x86 family under what circumstances would I expect the > corresponding <arch>64-linux directory in /usr/lib/valgrind, and what is > it's name? The name is amd64-linux. You would expect to get it if V was built on a 64-bit capable x86 CPU -- it is the configure script that decides what variants to build. J |
|
From: Dave N. <dc...@us...> - 2006-10-24 15:52:55
|
RHEL5 will include Valgrind 3.2.1 Julian Seward wrote: > On Monday 23 October 2006 21:49, Dave Nomura wrote: > >> I am reporting a problem to Red Hat that their RHEL5 release is missing >> the ppc64-linux diretory in /usr/lib/valgrind. >> > > ppc64-linux is only supported by V >= 3.2.0. If they are shipping 3.1.X > then you would only expect to see ppc32-linux/. > > > |