|
From: Eliot M. <mo...@cs...> - 2014-12-06 16:50:07
|
Dear developers -- Just wondering about this patch that I submitted a while back. It received some comments, which I think I addressed reasonably in an updated patch (in hope that it might make it into the recent release -- but no worries, it's not urgent). Here's the description: Bug 339405 - Adds ability to invoke a script in order to determine a log-file name for a child being forked It is an enhancement that is helpful for certain kinds of uses, as opposed to fixing a failure, but since there does not seem to have been any sort of response or follow up, I thought I would post here. Hope I am not being too impatient! Regards -- Eliot Moss |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2014-12-07 17:48:28
|
On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 11:49 -0500, Eliot Moss wrote:
> Dear developers -- Just wondering about this patch that I submitted a while back.
> It received some comments, which I think I addressed reasonably in an updated
> patch (in hope that it might make it into the recent release -- but no worries,
> it's not urgent). Here's the description:
>
> Bug 339405 - Adds ability to invoke a script in order to determine a log-file name for a child being
> forked
>
> It is an enhancement that is helpful for certain kinds of uses, as opposed to
> fixing a failure, but since there does not seem to have been any sort of response
> or follow up, I thought I would post here. Hope I am not being too impatient!
No problem for asking some news.
Julian has added the below in 3_10_BUGSTATUS.txt, so I guess it should
go in the next release 3.11
339405 Adds ability to invoke a script in order to determine a
log-file name for a child being forked
Has plausible patch, should take
Philippe
|
|
From: Eliot M. <mo...@cs...> - 2014-12-07 19:31:57
|
On 12/7/2014 12:48 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 11:49 -0500, Eliot Moss wrote: >> Dear developers -- Just wondering about this patch that I submitted a while back. >> It received some comments, which I think I addressed reasonably in an updated >> patch (in hope that it might make it into the recent release -- but no worries, >> it's not urgent). Here's the description: >> >> Bug 339405 - Adds ability to invoke a script in order to determine a log-file name for a child being >> forked >> >> It is an enhancement that is helpful for certain kinds of uses, as opposed to >> fixing a failure, but since there does not seem to have been any sort of response >> or follow up, I thought I would post here. Hope I am not being too impatient! > No problem for asking some news. > > Julian has added the below in 3_10_BUGSTATUS.txt, so I guess it should > go in the next release 3.11 > > 339405 Adds ability to invoke a script in order to determine a > log-file name for a child being forked > Has plausible patch, should take Thanks, guys! Yours in tool maintenance :-) ... Eliot |