|
From: Florian K. <br...@ac...> - 2012-12-19 04:41:00
|
Something isn't quite right with that revision. I just rebuild my working copy from scratch with no local mods and plenty of tests are failing. E.g: -- Finished tests in none/tests ---------------------------------------- == 141 tests, 28 stderr failures, 72 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == Backing out VEX r2590 and valgrind r13179 brings things back to normal. I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 on this box: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz stepping : 7 microcode : 0x18 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 6144 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 4390.21 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: I don't know how to fix this tho. Florian |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2012-12-19 08:43:02
|
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, Florian Krohm wrote: > Something isn't quite right with that revision. > I just rebuild my working copy from scratch with no local mods and > plenty of tests are failing. Yes .. Rich Coe also mentioned this. The regtests work fine for me on this machine, but in this case I'd guess the problem depends on both architecture specifics and glibc version. I looked again at r2590 and saw a silly mistake, which is fixed in r2597. Can you try again and see if that works? Thanks (both) for spotting this. J |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2012-12-19 14:22:36
|
Hi Julian R2597 works much better! No hangs. Thanks, Rich On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:42:50 +0100 Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, Florian Krohm wrote: > > Something isn't quite right with that revision. > > I just rebuild my working copy from scratch with no local mods and > > plenty of tests are failing. > > Yes .. Rich Coe also mentioned this. The regtests work fine for me > on this machine, but in this case I'd guess the problem depends on both > architecture specifics and glibc version. > > I looked again at r2590 and saw a silly mistake, which is fixed in > r2597. Can you try again and see if that works? > > Thanks (both) for spotting this. > > J -- Rich Coe rc...@wi... |
|
From: Florian K. <br...@ac...> - 2012-12-19 15:11:54
|
On 12/19/2012 03:42 AM, Julian Seward wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, Florian Krohm wrote: >> Something isn't quite right with that revision. >> I just rebuild my working copy from scratch with no local mods and >> plenty of tests are failing. > > > I looked again at r2590 and saw a silly mistake, which is fixed in > r2597. Can you try again and see if that works? Works fine again now. regtest results are as they were before. Thanks! Florian |