|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2008-06-23 12:25:05
|
Author: bart
Date: 2008-06-23 13:25:12 +0100 (Mon, 23 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 8271
Log:
Result of timerfd() syscall is no longer printed to stdout, which should make this regression test more reproducible.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.c
trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.stdout.exp
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.c 2008-06-23 12:11:49 UTC (rev 8270)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.c 2008-06-23 12:25:12 UTC (rev 8271)
@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@
perror("timerfd_create");
return 1;
}
- fprintf(stdout, "timerfd = %d\n", tfd);
if (timerfd_settime(tfd, 0, &tmr, NULL))
{
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.stdout.exp
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.stdout.exp 2008-06-23 12:11:49 UTC (rev 8270)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/linux-timerfd-syscall.stdout.exp 2008-06-23 12:25:12 UTC (rev 8271)
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
---------------------------------------
relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-timerfd = 3
wating timer ...
got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
@@ -19,7 +18,7 @@
wating timer ...
got timer ticks (20) after 2.0 s
O_NONBLOCK test ...
-timerfd = 3
+timerfd = 5
wating timer (flush the single tick) ...
got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
success
@@ -30,7 +29,6 @@
---------------------------------------
relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-timerfd = 3
wating timer ...
got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
@@ -44,7 +42,7 @@
wating timer ...
got timer ticks (20) after 2.0 s
O_NONBLOCK test ...
-timerfd = 3
+timerfd = 5
wating timer (flush the single tick) ...
got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
success
|